Jump to content

Yusniel Diaz - failed prospect?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

.519 OPS for the year, .606 in AA and  .489 in AAA.   Since June 30, he’s at .308 OPS.

He was out of action from May 10 to June 14, then again from July 12 to August 2.   The latest injury was turf toe, and it’s possible that’s still bothering him.  

I’m to the point of wondering if he’s worth a 40-man roster spot.   I think he’ll be a MiL 6-year free agent if we don’t protect him.  

Thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically with SG here.   This guy has to be considered on the chopping block soon as we have other OF coming up behind him that we need to play.........Stowers I guess being the primary example.   Ideally you give him at least 2022 to try and resurrect something.......but I think that is probably make or break for him.  He had a fantastic year in AA at the age of 21.........but that was three years ago now.  Shame that he was never really able to replicate that in our system.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Injuries have just decimated his career.  Be nice if he can get healthy in the offseason and come into ST in great shape and start to get himself back into the player many thought he could be.

But hard to believe that happens at this point.

I’ve seen him look really impressive in some spring training at bats.   He’s a pretty imposing presence.   But yeah, always getting hurt.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying Patrick Corbin is a guy we should target, but if we do target some team's salary dump/reclamation project and something is required in the trade where the other team would obviously be eating money, Diaz is a logical trade chip/flyer for such a deal. He could be a classic change of scenery guy.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I'm not saying Patrick Corbin is a guy we should target, but if we do target some team's salary dump/reclamation project and something is required in the trade where the other team would obviously be eating money, Diaz is a logical trade chip/flyer for such a deal. He could be a classic change of scenery guy.

Hasn't he already had a change of scenery? How did that work out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panick said:

Hasn't he already had a change of scenery? How did that work out?

I didn't say he'd be a stud for another team. I'm saying that if you need to trade someone, don't want to give up real value, but they want to have a lottery ticket, then it might be the right type of fit.

That's why I mentioned someone like Corbin. He's owed something like $70 million over the next 3 years and he has the worst ERA of any qualifying pitcher in MLB this year. If the Nats trade him, they'd have to eat the vast majority of that salary. Some return would be required in the deal. It couldn't be a Westburg/Stowers type. I wouldn't even want to give someone like Watson. I'd use Diaz in that type of deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's never really showed anything with the O's but I think Elias believes he's a player if he can stay healthy.  I think you keep him on the 40 man and hope he has a healthy year next year before making a final decision on him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diaz looks like a player who is very bored with being in the minor leagues. He doesn't play like he's having any fun and is the epitome of a guy who looks likes he's going through the motions. 

At the same time, he still has no plan at the plate and and has never learned to have one. He still swings at the bad sliders away in situations where he should know that pitch is coming. 

He might be a guy that needs a change of scenery again, but honestly, I think he's just a guy who was overrated all along and who is injury riddled.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that this guy was the crown jewel of the sell off is great example of why we are where we are right now. I gotta say though, I am shocked that he's been this bad. When I saw him at Bowie/ST he always looked like a big leaguer. Good arm, strong guy with some pop. Injuries really can just completely ruin a prospect especially if they pile up. I fear the same with Santander and Hays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LTO's said:

The fact that this guy was the crown jewel of the sell off is great example of why we are where we are right now. I gotta say though, I am shocked that he's been this bad. When I saw him at Bowie/ST he always looked like a big leaguer. Good arm, strong guy with some pop. Injuries really can just completely ruin a prospect especially if they pile up. I fear the same with Santander and Hays. 

You mean the inability of Elias and company to develop him?  ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has to be something going on with lingering injuries. Hard to completely give up on a potential five tool type of talent. What's the downside to keeping him on for another year? That said he's had plenty of opportunities. It was almost like he flipped a switch when joining our system and decided to stop producing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...