Jump to content

Josh Rogers Another Great Start


NelsonCruuuuuz

Recommended Posts

While it's easy to jump on the OP for screwing up the name in the thread, let's look at Roger's stuff compared to Alex Wells and Zac Lowther. Note, less is better when it comes to vertical movement (drop) on fastball. More is better on other pitches.

Fastball       vel     spin   Ext    Whiff%    drop (V)   break (H)  XWOBA
Rogers         90.5  2060  6.1     16.2          18                11.4         .346    
Wells            88.9  2149  5.8     16.9          16.6              7.8         .381
Lowther       90.7  2175  7.0     15.2          17.9             12.1         .499

Change       
Rogers         80.6  1415    6.1    15.0          34.6            12.5         .202 
Wells            83.6  1557    5.6    20.0         30.2            14.2         .459
Lowther       83.3  1888   6.9    27.6         27.5             13.6         .374

Slider   
Rogers         81.0   2133    6.1    25.0         40.3             2.1          .302
Wells            81.4  2317     5.6   26.2         38.0             1.6          .310
Lowther       80.9  2628    6.7   48.0        36.2            14.1         .273

Curve
Wells           73.0  2503     5.4    13.2        63.3              9.9         .484
Lowther      75.2  2553    6.8     31.8          63.6                13.0          .320

Rogers only threw one curve so I didn't include that. Worth noting is the speed difference between his change and fastball vs Wells and Lowther's harder changes. Rogers change drops way more and is about 1o MPH difference from his fastball making it a much better pitch than either Wells or Lowther's change. 

Lowther has the best slider, but Rogers get's more drop. Lowther's fastball looks better in movement, velocity and release, but his location has gotten him hammered. 

Either way, it's only been three starts for Rogers, but he was given away for free.

Personally, I'd take Lowther's stuff over Wells and Rogers and yes, I do think the other shoe will drop against Rogers unless he suddenly has come up with plus plus command of his fastball and change. 

Oh, Rogers is 26, Lowther 25, Wells 24. Based off statcast movement and velocity, I'd take Rogers over Wells but Lowther over them both despite the bad XWOBAs.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

When Ed Rodgers was let go, I posted a few times I thought it was bizarre. He was coming off a major injury and never had enough of a routine to evaluate. When Nationals signed him (with a very good GM with a scouting background) grabbed him, I noticed. He pitched 7 2/3 innings tonight of 1 run ball and now has an ERA of 2 and has had 4 good starts. Meanwhile we have 4A fodder & guys that won’t make the 40 man through the off-season. Why wasn’t he given more time?

Moderator edit (Josh Rogers)

He’s terrible. If he’s NOT terrible for someone else I don’t care. Lots of guys have a dead cat bounce.

Parker Bridwell went to the Angels on a waiver claim and went 10-3… and hasn’t been back since.

Im not worried about losing Josh Rogers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Philip said:

He’s terrible. If he’s NOT terrible for someone else I don’t care. Lots of guys have a dead cat bounce.

Parker Bridwell went to the Angels on a waiver claim and went 10-3… and hasn’t been back since.

Im not worried about losing Josh Rogers

Some people here will remember my history with Bridwell.   I don’t think he was likely to amount to anything much, but in fairness to him, he suffered a serious injury the year after his 10-3 season, so we’ll never know if he could have sustained his success if he’d been healthy.   He had bone spurs removed and a stem cell injection but he was never the same.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Some people here will remember my history with Bridwell.   I don’t think he was likely to amount to anything much, but in fairness to him, he suffered a serious injury the year after his 10-3 season, so we’ll never know if he could have sustained his success if he’d been healthy.   He had bone spurs removed and a stem cell injection but he was never the same.   

Well, frankly, I was completely furious that we let him go. And I said frequently that even if he was terrible after going 10-3, at least he went 10-3, And we let him go at a time when we didn’t even have five reliable starters. I spent that whole season being furious with Buck and Dan, and I’m glad they’re gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Some people here will remember my history with Bridwell.   I don’t think he was likely to amount to anything much, but in fairness to him, he suffered a serious injury the year after his 10-3 season, so we’ll never know if he could have sustained his success if he’d been healthy.   He had bone spurs removed and a stem cell injection but he was never the same.   

That’s a pretty good take.

Again, my dad in CA watches every Angels game, sometimes even the replay! He’s the harshest critic I know and he said Bridwell never looked the same after the injury. Only anecdotal, but the injury was very real and it likely ended his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Rogers only threw one curve so I didn't include that. Worth noting is the speed difference between his change and fastball vs Wells and Lowther's harder changes. Rogers change drops way more and is about 10 MPH difference from his fastball making it a much better pitch than either Wells or Lowther. 

So, also interesting to note that a few years back there were a few pitchers (very few) who experimented with just slightly dropping the differential from their FBs to the five mph range, the “hard” change, as it were. Greinke, was the most notable, but their were others. And now that’s all he does, which is fine at this stage of his career. 

As the old saying goes, though, pitching is about changing speeds (and probably eye level along with command), but it ain’t easy. Ask any of the “pitchers” the Orioles have run out there this year besides Means, and I’m sure they can attest.

I’ve always liked around 10 mph off the FB as a good range. 

Edited by Il BuonO
Space
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to derail too much, but now that we are several years removed from the Yaz situation, even with his strong season in 2019 and really good 2020, I prefer our OF to Yaz. This year, Hays and Yaz have a similar OPS, but Hays is obviously much younger. And while Santander has had a down year, the age factor plays in there as well. Mancini even has a (slight) age advantage over him. He would have been better than guys we sent out there the last couple years, but the team would have still been terrible. And for the future, he's not really a great fit. We made a huge deal about his loss, but in the grand scheme of things, it really didn't have much of an impact on the franchise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

While it's easy to jump on the OP for screwing up the name in the thread, let's look at Roger's stuff compared to Alex Wells and Zac Lowther. Note, less is better when it comes to vertical movement (drop) on fastball. More is better on other pitches.

Fastball       vel     spin   Ext    Whiff%    drop (V)   break (H)  XWOBA
Rogers         90.5  2060  6.1     16.2          18                11.4         .346    
Wells            88.9  2149  5.8     16.9          16.6              7.8         .381
Lowther       90.7  2175  7.0     15.2          17.9             12.1         .499

Change       
Rogers         80.6  1415    6.1    15.0          34.6            12.5         .202 
Wells            83.6  1557    5.6    20.0         30.2            14.2         .459
Lowther       83.3  1888   6.9    27.6         27.5             13.6         .374

Slider   
Rogers         81.0   2133    6.1    25.0         40.3             2.1          .302
Wells            81.4  2317     5.6   26.2         38.0             1.6          .310
Lowther       80.9  2628    6.7   48.0        36.2            14.1         .273

Curve
Wells           73.0  2503     5.4    13.2        63.3              9.9         .484
Lowther      75.2  2553    6.8     31.8          63.6                13.0          .320

Rogers only threw one curve so I didn't include that. Worth noting is the speed difference between his change and fastball vs Wells and Lowther's harder changes. Rogers change drops way more and is about 1o MPH difference from his fastball making it a much better pitch than either Wells or Lowther's change. 

Lowther has the best slider, but Rogers get's more drop. Lowther's fastball looks better in movement, velocity and release, but his location has gotten him hammered. 

Either way, it's only been three starts for Rogers, but he was given away for free.

Personally, I'd take Lowther's stuff over Wells and Rogers and yes, I do think the other shoe will drop against Rogers unless he suddenly has come up with plus plus command of his fastball and change. 

Oh, Rogers is 26, Lowther 25, Wells 24. Based off statcast movement and velocity, I'd take Rogers over Wells but Lowther over them both despite the bad XWOBAs.

I think the changeup speed is the difference. It increases Rogers effectiveness when contrasted with his fastball. Lowther and Wells need to come up with a slower changeup, IMO. Thats my laymen's take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jabba72 said:

I think the changeup speed is the difference. It increases Rogers effectiveness when contrasted with his fastball. Lowther and Wells need to come up with a slower changeup, IMO. Thats my laymen's take.

I've been saying for years that Well's and Lowther's changeups are too hard. Not everyone is going to have a John Means' changeup but you would think they would have been able to improve the pitch somehow by now. Makes me think just can't find a grip they can use effectively to get the 10 MPH difference and be able to command the pitch. 

I have the same issue with Drew Rom right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamalshw said:

Not to derail too much, but now that we are several years removed from the Yaz situation, even with his strong season in 2019 and really good 2020, I prefer our OF to Yaz. This year, Hays and Yaz have a similar OPS, but Hays is obviously much younger. And while Santander has had a down year, the age factor plays in there as well. Mancini even has a (slight) age advantage over him. He would have been better than guys we sent out there the last couple years, but the team would have still been terrible. And for the future, he's not really a great fit. We made a huge deal about his loss, but in the grand scheme of things, it really didn't have much of an impact on the franchise. 

I agree with this. Yaz will be 31 next year. His age is getting dangerously close to the end of his everyday career. He does have hall of fame bloodlines though, so you never know how long his career will last. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...