Jump to content

Nats recent draft failure


Recommended Posts

Nationals president of baseball operations Mike Rizzo has already prioritized some offseason changes in how the Nats scout and develop their players, due to a lack of recent help in the minor league pipeline.  The draft is the most glaring example of this issue, as MASNsports.com’s Mark Zuckerman notes that Anthony Rendon (picked sixth overall in 2011) is the last Washington draft pick taken in any round to generate more than 1.0 WAR for the team.

Shocking that the great Nats had no one since Rendon drafted in 2011 make for than 1.0 WAR for the Nats.  The article mentioned some of the Nats trades.  That makes the O's of the early 2000's sound competent.  Obviously right before that, Strasburg, Harper and Rendon were huge successes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Nationals president of baseball operations Mike Rizzo has already prioritized some offseason changes in how the Nats scout and develop their players, due to a lack of recent help in the minor league pipeline.  The draft is the most glaring example of this issue, as MASNsports.com’s Mark Zuckerman notes that Anthony Rendon (picked sixth overall in 2011) is the last Washington draft pick taken in any round to generate more than 1.0 WAR for the team.

Shocking that the great Nats had no one since Rendon drafted in 2011 make for than 1.0 WAR for the Nats.  The article mentioned some of the Nats trades.  That makes the O's of the early 2000's sound competent.  Obviously right before that, Strasburg, Harper and Rendon were huge successes. 

Someone who has literally never watched a baseball game in their life but who had access to Google could have drafted Strasburg and Harper.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Grady said:

Should this be over on the Senators message board? I could give a rats ass about any Washington sports team

Well, it probably belongs in the MLB section, where there are lots of threads about other teams.  But since it’s not on the main board, who cares?

i see two guys the Nats drafted after 2011 who’ve been worth more than 1 WAR, but after being traded:

Giolito (11.1 rWAR) - traded for Eaton

Pivetta (3.8 rWAR) - traded for Papelbon

I believe we’ve picked ten guys after 2011 worth more than 1 rWAR - Hader, Gausman, Mancini, Means, Yastrzemski, Walker, Hart, Hays, Mullins, Mountcastle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, El_Duderino said:

Who cares. They also signed Soto who is on an early HoF track.

Apparently the Nats FO does...

Quote

Nationals president of baseball operations Mike Rizzo has already prioritized some offseason changes in how the Nats scout and develop their players, due to a lack of recent help in the minor league pipeline

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, El_Duderino said:

Who cares. They also signed Soto who is on an early HoF track.

Soto (17.5 rWAR through age 22) is a superstar, and Robles (4.5 rWAR) has had his moments, though he’s seemed lost the last couple of years.   Those are the only foreign amateurs signed by the Nats in the cited time window (after 2011) who’ve been worth more than 1 rWAR.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, El_Duderino said:

I pin their problems less on draft misses and more on their unwillingness to spend like the dodgers. Their lineup should have a core of Turner, Soto, Harper, Rendon. 

“Unwillingness?”  The Dodgers’ annual revenues are $200 mm+ higher than the Nationals’.    The Nats have spent a much higher proportion of their revenue on payroll than most teams over the last decade.   They don’t have the capacity to spend as much as the Dodgers.   Harper and Rendon would have cost more than $65 mm/yr to keep, plus luxury tax.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

“Unwillingness?”  The Dodgers’ annual revenues are $200 mm+ higher than the Nationals’.    The Nats have spent a much higher proportion of their revenue on payroll than most teams over the last decade.   They don’t have the capacity to spend as much as the Dodgers.   Harper and Rendon would have cost more than $65 mm/yr to keep, plus luxury tax.   

They outspent the Dodgers in ‘19.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2021 at 6:24 PM, El_Duderino said:

I pin their problems less on draft misses and more on their unwillingness to spend like the dodgers. Their lineup should have a core of Turner, Soto, Harper, Rendon. 

I don't think Harper was ever going to sign long term with the Nats, and they knew it. He had a serious dispute with them over the contract he signed after being drafted in 2010. There was bad blood there and he was always going to bolt DC the first chance he got. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ShoelesJoe said:

I don't think Harper was ever going to sign long term with the Nats, and they knew it. He had a serious dispute with them over the contract he signed after being drafted in 2010. There was bad blood there and he was always going to bolt DC the first chance he got. 

“I sat there with my wife and said, ‘Babe, we’re going back. We’re going back to D.C.,’” Harper said. “If they offer me anything close—I want real money though. I don’t want deferred money. I wanted them to understand that. If they would’ve deferred a little bit of it, I would’ve been fine with that.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
    • On the spot?  Maybe.   Even at full health, people would have accepted not winning the division because of the pace the Yankees are on.   We have a comfortable lead for the WC so if the Orioles can continue winning at a reasonable pace with Burnes/GRod/Kremer/Irvin/Povich/Suarez.   As far as the playoffs go, there’s only a few starters that inspire confidence in a playoff series that will be available.   Elias isn’t trading Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo.  He just isn’t.   He can get relievers without giving up top prospects.  The question is, can he get someone like Crochet without giving up those top 3?   Crochet, despite innings concerns, gives you a playoff starter plus someone who’ll be here after Burnes is gone. However, Crochet is an A.J. Preller type of move, not an Elias type of move.   If Povich looks the part of a ML starter AND no more starters go down, I could see Elias standing pat on the starters and fortifying the back end of the bullpen.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after the fourth round. San Diego Padres Compensation for Josh Hader. The Astros forfeited their second-round pick for signing Hader. San Diego Padres Compensation for Blake Snell. The Giants forfeited their third-round pick for signing Snell. Toronto Blue Jays Compensation for Matt Chapman. The Giants forfeited their second-round pick for signing Chapman.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after Competitive Balance Round B.   Los Angeles Angels Compensation for Shohei Ohtani. The Dodgers forfeited their second- and fifth-round picks for signing Ohtani.
    • picks If a team that loses a qualifying free agent is a revenue-sharing recipient and the free agent signs for at least $50 million, the team will be awarded a pick between the first round and Competitive Balance Round A.   Minnesota Twins Compensation for Sonny Gray. The Cardinals forfeited their second-round pick for signing Gray.
    • The answer appears to be, yes, you can receive more than one compensation picks. Angels -- Shohei Ohtani: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Blue Jays -- Matt Chapman: Pick after Round 4 Cubs -- Cody Bellinger: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Padres -- Blake Snell: Pick after Round 4 Padres -- Josh Hader: Pick after Round 4
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...