Jump to content

2021 Orioles #14 Prospect - Maikol Hernandez - SS


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, glenn__davis said:

Definitely didn't expect this one, but sounds like Hernandez has all sorts of tools.

I’m going to go back to what I said before…I think these guys are so off of an Os fans radar because we just aren’t using to seeing them.  Its also different for Tony because he’s not used to these types of guys being considered either.

I thought Tony would go a different direction but this is the option I took because of the upside.  
 

You are at the point where there are a lot of good options but no one that has the upside of these guys.  I like the aggression of the ranking and it’s something that’s common with a lot of other teams.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the one hand, I love the fact that our international program has produced the no. 12 and 14 players in the system.   That's huge progress.

On the other hand, I don't really see Hernandez being ranked this high based on body type or whatever.  He didn't really produce all that well.   I can see him in the top 30, but not this high.   The fact that he's here kind of discourages me about what Tony thinks of the more experienced players.

I did like that little clip of Hernandez hitting in the cage that O's player development put up a few days ago.

Orioles Player Development on Twitter: "Maikol Hernandez cage work ? https://t.co/t9JYM4jVlS" / Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

On the one hand, I love the fact that our international program has produced the no. 12 and 14 players in the system.   That's huge progress.

On the other hand, I don't really see Hernandez being ranked this high based on body type or whatever.  He didn't really produce all that well.   I can see him in the top 30, but not this high.   The fact that he's here kind of discourages me about what Tony thinks of the more experienced players.

I did like that little clip of Hernandez hitting in the cage that O's player development put up a few days ago.

Orioles Player Development on Twitter: "Maikol Hernandez cage work ? https://t.co/t9JYM4jVlS" / Twitter

There is a little bit to this. I'm not sure I would say "discouraged," but as guys get closer it's easier to evaluate and assess what they will be at the major league level. It's pretty obvious at this point that I have doubts have Bradish and Baumann will stick as starters since they have pitched at higher levels than Rom and Pinto. 

I value potential starters more than guys I feel will end up being relievers. If I feel a guy has a chance to be an everyday guy, I'd rather have him in my system than a guy who is probably a 40 to 45 level player. Now these guys like Basallo and Hernandez may flame out and not even become 40-45 level players, but in my mind, there's a lot more 40 to 45 level players available which makes them less valuable than a guy who could be a regular or better.

Do I feel super great about putting guys on this list this high when I've never seen them play a game? No, but sometimes you have to look at the entire package and give some trust into the scouts who thought they were worth the money they got and the scouts who have seen this since.

Again, I'm not saying anyone else is wrong if they have these guys lower, but I will say if I thought there were every day guys at high levels they would be ahead of them.

Saying that, I still have a very generic look at some of the 2021 draft picks and don't feel great about evaluations until after they get a full season under their belts. 

But that's what makes this process interesting to me.

 

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m going to go back to what I said before…I think these guys are so off of an Os fans radar because we just aren’t using to seeing them.  Its also different for Tony because he’s not used to these types of guys being considered either.

I wouldn't say Hernandez is off my radar at all, far from it, I was just surprised to see him this high.  But then I always like to see guys have some success at A-ball before starting to get really excited about them.  I get why Tony has him here, I just didn't expect it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

There is a little bit to this. I'm not sure I would say "discouraged," but as guys get closer it's easier to evaluate and access what they will be at the major league level. It's pretty obvious at this point that I have doubts have Bradish and Baumann will stick as starters since they have pitched at high levels than Rom and Pinto. 

I value potential starters more than guys I feel will end up being relievers. If I feel a guy has a chance to be an everyday guy, I'd rather him in my system then a guy who is probably a 40 to 45 level player. Now these guys like Basallo and Hernandez may flame out and not even become 40-45 level players, but in my mind, there's a lot more 40 to 45 level players available which makes them less valuable than a guy who could be a regular or better.

Do I feel super great about putting guys on this list this high when I've never seen them play a game? No, but sometimes you have to look at the entire package and give some trust into the scouts who thought they were worth the money they got and the scouts who have seen this since.

Again, I'm not saying anyone else is wrong if they have these guys lower, but I will say if I thought there were every day guys at high levels they would be ahead of them.

Saying that, I still have a very generic look at some of the 2021 draft picks and don't feel great about evaluations until after they get a full season under their belts. 

But that's what makes this process interesting to me.

 

 

That's gotta be the hardest thing about evaluating teenage players - weighing the ceiling vs most likely outcome.    

As far as starters vs relievers, yes starters are more valuable, but the difference gets smaller every year.  When you find a guy who can be a dominant reliever, I think that's sometimes more valuable than a 4th or 5th starter.  But I get that finding starters is much harder than finding relievers - and that has to fit in the equation.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

That's gotta be the hardest thing about evaluating teenage players - weighing the ceiling vs most likely outcome.    

As far as starters vs relievers, yes starters are more valuable, but the difference gets smaller every year.  When you find a guy who can be a dominant reliever, I think that's sometimes more valuable than a 4th or 5th starter.  But I get that finding starters is much harder than finding relievers - and that has to fit in the equation.   

 

I agree with this statement. If I think a guy can be converted into a lights out dominant closer, that would have more value to me than a 5th starter type.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The biggest thing I noticed was how much different he looks compared to when we first signed him. He’s definitely put in the work in the weight room. Hopefully, he starts in the FCL this year. 

I expect he will.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The biggest thing I noticed was how much different he looks compared to when we first signed him. He’s definitely put in the work in the weight room. Hopefully, he starts in the FCL this year. 

The guys that were invite to the instructional league from the DSL will be in the FCL next season at the very least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...