Jump to content

Correa (Update, signs with Twins)


Yardball85

Recommended Posts

Greinke is coming off a pretty mediocre year.  ErA wasn’t great, his K rate was way down and homers were way up.  He did have an excellent BB rate but his FIP was 4.71.

And that’s with his BABiP being 30 points lower than his career.

His swingstr% was the worst in a decade.

He isn’t trending in the right direction and would be coming to a harder division and worse defense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Lol.  Nah, I understand it perfectly.  You just aren’t getting what I’m saying.

well 1 WAR players aren't easy to come by and aren't cheap so..... by definition they're a decent major league player. You're not going to get them all from your farm system. And by definition a 1-2 win player on a 10-15m contract would be market value 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Not sure I agree with that in our park and division.  
 

Doesn’t matter, he ain’t coming here.  If he leaves Houston, it’s to go to another contender.

They all have to pitch in the same park and division.  Grienke pitched more innings by a lot than any on our staff last year.  And had a much better ERA/ERA+ than anyone besides Means.

Now I'm not advocating signing him.  And ultimately, I think you're right.  He's not coming here.

But I think it's pretty clear why "anyone would want to sign Grienke."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Greinke is coming off a pretty mediocre year.  ErA wasn’t great, his K rate was way down and homers were way up.  He did have an excellent BB rate but his FIP was 4.71.

And that’s with his BABiP being 30 points lower than his career.

His swingstr% was the worst in a decade.

He isn’t trending in the right direction and would be coming to a harder division and worse defense.

 

And Greinke's 38 years old now too. Maybe he will be alright this year, but there's the very real possibility he's a repeat of the Kevin Millwood season with the Orioles in 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, seak05 said:

well 1 WAR players aren't easy to come by and aren't cheap so..... by definition they're a decent major league player. You're not going to get them all from your farm system. And by definition a 1-2 win player on a 10-15m contract would be market value 

Yes I’m aware but anyone actually paying that for a 1 war player is making a monster mistake.

Almost 400 players were worth 1 WAR or more last year and I’m sure there were a slew of relievers who didn’t make that bench mark and those players aren’t always calculated well in the WAR formula.  So no, I don’t think it’s overly hard to find it.

Paying  that kind of money for 1 WAR is just bad.  2 WAR starts to be a little more justifiable but it depends on a lot of factors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pickles said:

They all have to pitch in the same park and division.  Grienke pitched more innings by a lot than any on our staff last year.  And had a much better ERA/ERA+ than anyone besides Means.

Now I'm not advocating signing him.  And ultimately, I think you're right.  He's not coming here.

But I think it's pretty clear why "anyone would want to sign Grienke."

People get excited about a big name, especially a future HOFer.

But yea, coming off the year he did and with his stuff getting worse, I don’t understand why anyone would want to sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greinke 2021 stats:

11-6,  4.16 ERA,   29 starts, 171 IP  164 H  1.170 WHIP. 

He does not have a blazing fastball.  He is a finesse pitcher.   So his strikeouts are low at 120.   Pitchers out pitch their FIP all the time.

He is well worth a 1/15m contract with an 15m club option.

You do you have that is better  and available that the O's could sign?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jrobb21613 said:

Do you guys think that a Correa signing would be enough to attract solid Veteran pitching a guy like Grienke who before might not want to come here to help leap lead a young pitching staff? 

I think if Correa signed we might trade Coby Mayo for Frankie Montas tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Greinke 2021 stats:

11-6,  4.16 ERA,   29 starts, 171 IP  164 H  1.170 WHIP. 

He does not have a blazing fastball.  He is a finesse pitcher.   So his strikeouts are low at 120.   Pitchers out pitch their FIP all the time.

He is well worth a 1/15m contract with an 15m club option.

You do you have that is better  and available that the O's could sign?

There is so much info you are leaving out in this post.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

That sounds very specific, got some info or did I miss a news story?

No.   

Just speculating on puzzle pieces, and the KIND of move that might be there if Elias wanted to try for 6th in the AL with Mullins, Correa, Adley and Grayson in 2022, as opposed to giving Orioles Correa the Padres Machado 70-92 Year 1 type experience.

Sign Collin McHugh and Trevor Rosenthal after that too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...