Jump to content

Who will pitch the home opener?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Means appears lined up to start Opening Day in Tampa.   But the stomach flu appears to have messed with Hyde's plan to have Lyles pitch the home opener.   I am wondering if Lyles get more rest between starts to line him up for the home opener start or does Hyde go with someone else?

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Means is our only decent starter, so if it isn't him, it doesn't really make much of a difference.

37 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

An Opening Day bullpen day would kind of be on point for what baseball has become in 2022.

Honestly, that might be our best chance of winning if Means isn't going to be starting the game. Sign me up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

We don't even know who is in the rotation yet but my random guess would be Zimmerman.

Zimmerman is pitching today, which is 12 days before the home opener.

Interestingly, Means has been lined up for the home opener.   His last start was Sunday, so going every 5th day would have him lined up to pitch the home opener, not the opener in Tampa.

Has Hyde announced an Opening Day starter for the 8th?   Perhaps he is saving Means to open in front of the home crowd and will go with Lyles in the Tampa opener?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Zimmerman is pitching today, which is 12 days before the home opener.

Interestingly, Means has been lined up for the home opener.   His last start was Sunday, so going every 5th day would have him lined up to pitch the home opener, not the opener in Tampa.

Has Hyde announced an Opening Day starter for the 8th?   Perhaps he is saving Means to open in front of the home crowd and will go with Lyles in the Tampa opener?

Be nice to see a hometown kid get the start in Zim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Zimmerman is pitching today, which is 12 days before the home opener.

Interestingly, Means has been lined up for the home opener.   His last start was Sunday, so going every 5th day would have him lined up to pitch the home opener, not the opener in Tampa.

Has Hyde announced an Opening Day starter for the 8th?   Perhaps he is saving Means to open in front of the home crowd and will go with Lyles in the Tampa opener?

If they are lining guys up to pitch every 5th day, then the home opener starter would be whoever pitches on Friday. However, there is an off day on 4/7 which would then make the home opener the starter in tomorrow's game, which is Akin. But with guys just getting stretched out I'm not sure they are on schedule yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

If they are lining guys up to pitch every 5th day, then the home opener starter would be whoever pitches on Friday. However, there is an off day on 4/7 which would then make the home opener the starter in tomorrow's game, which is Akin. But with guys just getting stretched out I'm not sure they are on schedule yet. 

I think your math is off.   The person that pitches Friday (4/1) could go on normal rest 4/6 vs Detroit and then go in the home opener on 4/11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I think your math is off.   The person that pitches Friday (4/1) could go on normal rest 4/6 vs Detroit and then go in the home opener on 4/11.

I think that's what I said. If they are lined up, it would be the same as the Friday 4/1 starter. However, there is an off day on 4/7 so if they keep the rotation with extra rest it would be Akin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SteveA said:

Zimmerman is pitching today, which is 12 days before the home opener.

Interestingly, Means has been lined up for the home opener.   His last start was Sunday, so going every 5th day would have him lined up to pitch the home opener, not the opener in Tampa.

Has Hyde announced an Opening Day starter for the 8th?   Perhaps he is saving Means to open in front of the home crowd and will go with Lyles in the Tampa opener?

They said on today's MASN telecast that Hyde will be announcing the opening day starter (April 8th) tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...