Jump to content

Connolly looks at why Elias signed Lyles


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

https://theathletic.com/3222585/2022/04/01/why-the-orioles-were-aggressive-in-pursuing-jordan-lyles-and-why-lyles-was-interested/?source=user_shared_article
 

Heading into this offseason, Elias knew what he wanted in one-year pitching targets.

“We were putting more of a premium on the health and the potential for innings and support for the rest of our young pitching staff,” Elias said. “Whereas I think another team in a different part of their (competitive) cycle might put a little more emphasis on guys that presented some impact last year, in 2021, but just weren’t on the field very much — taking like a medical gamble. We were more interested in getting a guy that was in very good health and, if things go well, would be able to help our young rotation carry the bulk that we struggled with last year.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The premise seems to be that you have to choose between pitchers who are healthy and pitchers that are good.  But I’ve heard that it is possible for a pitcher to be both.   

Being both is hard to find in free agents that will sign one year contracts.  Usually have to go multiple years to get that kind of starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know they want Lyles for innings.  That has always been obvious.  If he can give the team even 160 innings in 2022, that would be fine.   After all, that is all you are paying for.

You aren’t paying for production because you know it won’t be that great. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

So those guys do not come to play here.

Of course they would.  You just have to pay theM and show them why they should be here.

Of course, when you leave your best players in the minors and aren’t willing to pay FAs, no one sees a reason to come.  Do the opposite and you get players here.  It’s not that difficult of a concept.  
 

Players want to see that you give a sh!t.  There is nothing about how the Orioles are running the ML team that says they care right now.  
 

Give them a reason and they will come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ohfan67 said:

This is one of the most "duh" interview topics ever. Maybe next Connolly can get Elias to say that bats are made of wood. 

Yeah, I mean if you've been paying attention to Elias at all the last year or two, he's been extremely concerned about innings across the whole organization. Lyles does one thing pretty good and that's stay healthy and soak up innings without killing you. Obviously that's why they signed him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

https://theathletic.com/3222585/2022/04/01/why-the-orioles-were-aggressive-in-pursuing-jordan-lyles-and-why-lyles-was-interested/?source=user_shared_article
 

Heading into this offseason, Elias knew what he wanted in one-year pitching targets.

“We were putting more of a premium on the health and the potential for innings and support for the rest of our young pitching staff,” Elias said. “Whereas I think another team in a different part of their (competitive) cycle might put a little more emphasis on guys that presented some impact last year, in 2021, but just weren’t on the field very much — taking like a medical gamble. We were more interested in getting a guy that was in very good health and, if things go well, would be able to help our young rotation carry the bulk that we struggled with last year.”

The good news is he can throw a lot of innings.  The bad news is those innings won't be pretty.  🤣

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Of course they would.  You just have to pay theM and show them why they should be here.

Of course, when you leave your best players in the minors and aren’t willing to pay FAs, no one sees a reason to come.  Do the opposite and you get players here.  It’s not that difficult of a concept.  
 

Players want to see that you give a sh!t.  There is nothing about how the Orioles are running the ML team that says they care right now.  
 

Give them a reason and they will come.

They might now that the wall is moved back and once the O's are looking more like the Jays. But even in the good times the Orioles haven't been able to sign SPs. When Cobb is the biggest SP deal in franchise history, something is wrong. And that's when the team was good. In the 90s playoff years did they sign any big SPs? Nope. The perception has to change first. It's not about the money because someone will always be able to match or exceed the Orioles. 

Big name SPs do not come to play for the Orioles, no matter how much money is thrown at their feet. It's just not something that has ever happened. Elias is the first GM trying to finally address the perception of the ballpark. It's worth a shot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...