Jump to content

Buck Britton Will Be An Elite ML Manager


NelsonCruuuuuz

Recommended Posts

I like Britton, but the guy did have the best of the best of the O's system at Bowie, and he's got it again in Norfolk. That's not taking anything away from him - he still has to motivate and manage those players. But yeah. I agree it makes some sense to have him manage all those same guys in the big leagues, but that would really be a brutal thing to do to Hyde, who Elias has gone out of his way to praise and mention their collaboration, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Disagree. Just because that’s all they were able to quantify doesn’t mean that’s all the difference. I mean just look at what happened to the Orioles when they went from Trembley to Buck. 

What he was talking about is in game strategy and decisions.  There is virtually no difference.

Off field stuff can’t be measured, which is why I said what I did about culture change and stuff like that.

But again, that’s not what is needed in Baltimore anymore.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Disagree. Just because that’s all they were able to quantify doesn’t mean that’s all the difference. I mean just look at what happened to the Orioles when they went from Trembley to Buck. 

It might be possible to quantify the impact of in-game decisions.  It is not possible to quantify what goes on in the clubhouse and behind the scenes.  

I’m also a firm believer that sometimes managers are a positive influence for a while, but after a while the team begins to tune them out.   Same person, different effect.   

Kevin Goldstein, who was writing for Fangraphs after a stint in the Astros’ front office, was a firm believer that a manager can have a very significant impact.   He’s a numbers guy but understood that some things can’t be quantified.  


 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Disagree. Just because that’s all they were able to quantify doesn’t mean that’s all the difference. I mean just look at what happened to the Orioles when they went from Trembley to Buck. 

1.5 is an average. It's certainly possible for a manager to add more than 1.5 wins to a team compared to the guy he replaced. What I'd like to know is how many wins in 2011 you think are attributable to Buck Showalter and why you think that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Of the first few close games this season, do you think a better manager might have made better decisions that would have gotten us more wins?

No and even if Hyde made a decision that hurt us in game 3 compared to another manager, he will make a different decision in game 67 that the manager wouldn’t make that will win us a game.

We just need actual major league talent.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talent wins games … period.  Managers at best help each player to maximize their potential and understand their role. 
 

Earl was the best at getting this out of each person on the team but when he came back and had little talent, then he made no difference 

I could have managed the 1969-1970 Orioles and the outcome would have been the same 

Well …maybe I would have kicked the Mets butts.. lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Hyde has made a lot of poor in-game decisions, especially regarding the use of the pitching staff. I suspect that some of those have been driven by directions from Elias, or Hyde's interpretation of those directions, to test guys by using them in certain situations, and that others have been Hyde's own bad ideas. But there's no way to know, and even if you agree that Hyde has made more bad decisions than the norm (whatever that norm is) there's certainly no way to quantify their impact. Pretty small, I would think. A couple of games a year maybe? 

It certainly seems like the Orioles under Hyde have made far more than their share of poor decisions on the bases and in the field. But I don't know how to measure the number or cost of those decisions against an "average" number, or who is to blame if the Orioles have been well above average in the number of baserunning and fielding rocks. 

I used to think that the Orioles should have fired Hyde last year or in the off-season and replaced him with a proven winner or a young guy like Britton who they think would help build a winning attitude and make better decisions about the pitching staff. I guess I still think so, but Hyde is far, far down the list of factors separating the Orioles from being a good team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

It might be possible to quantify the impact of in-game decisions.  It is not possible to quantify what goes on in the clubhouse and behind the scenes.  

I’m also a firm believer that sometimes managers are a positive influence for a while, but after a while the team begins to tune them out.   Same person, different effect.   

Kevin Goldstein, who was writing for Fangraphs after a stint in the Astros’ front office, was a firm believer that a manager can have a very significant impact.   He’s a numbers guy but understood that some things can’t be quantified.  


 

Thank you. Such a terrific post. Spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Of the first few close games this season, do you think a better manager might have made better decisions that would have gotten us more wins?

Nah, I highly doubt it. The moves people don't like (bullpen stuff, pinch hitting stuff) all involve pitchers who are highly untested or position players who are fringe MLers at best. I didn't like McKenna PHing for Chirinos, but do I think it's likely Chirinos would have come through against the back end of the Brewers bullpen? No I do not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, interloper said:

Nah, I highly doubt it. The moves people don't like (bullpen stuff, pinch hitting stuff) all involve pitchers who are highly untested or position players who are fringe MLers at best. I didn't like McKenna PHing for Chirinos, but do I think it's likely Chirinos would have come through against the back end of the Brewers bullpen? No I do not. 

Yep.   I feel it was a wrong move too.   But it probably changed our odds of winning that game at that point from 11% to 9% or something like that.    Yet in people's minds, they remember they move they disagreed with and feel like it "cost us the game", or at least cou ld have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tntoriole said:

Talent wins games … period.  Managers at best help each player to maximize their potential and understand their role. 
 

Earl was the best at getting this out of each person on the team but when he came back and had little talent, then he made no difference 

I could have managed the 1969-1970 Orioles and the outcome would have been the same 

Well …maybe I would have kicked the Mets butts.. lol 

Earl was the best because he was an early adopter of stats and analytics.  He was a matchup fanatic.  

Sure, he had great, talented teams but it's not like he was managing by the seat of his pants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

It might be possible to quantify the impact of in-game decisions.  It is not possible to quantify what goes on in the clubhouse and behind the scenes.  

I’m also a firm believer that sometimes managers are a positive influence for a while, but after a while the team begins to tune them out.   Same person, different effect.   

Kevin Goldstein, who was writing for Fangraphs after a stint in the Astros’ front office, was a firm believer that a manager can have a very significant impact.   He’s a numbers guy but understood that some things can’t be quantified.  


 

Completely agree. Bobby Valentine's 2012 with the Red Sox is one extreme example of how much a manager can have an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck Britton may become a very fine minor league manager one day but I've been amused as the Buck Britton bandwagon has gotten fully loaded over the last 2 years.   You can't tell if this guy will be any good until he manages a big league season.   I'm also not sure what benefits he brings compared to a guy like Hyde who has shown tons of patience and had very little to work with.    My assumption is that Brandon Hyde could be a good manager if he had some good talent to work with.   I'd actually like to see him stay as the talent starts coming up through the systme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Buck Britton may become a very fine minor league manager one day but I've been amused as the Buck Britton bandwagon has gotten fully loaded over the last 2 years.   You can't tell if this guy will be any good until he manages a big league season.   I'm also not sure what benefits he brings compared to a guy like Hyde who has shown tons of patience and had very little to work with.    My assumption is that Brandon Hyde could be a good manager if he had some good talent to work with.   I'd actually like to see him stay as the talent starts coming up through the systme.

To be clear, I don’t dislike Hyde or disagree with your assessment, just think Britton will be special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...