Jump to content

Can anyone hit the #$%&! dang ball.....?


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I wonder if this is players adjusting to the "swing decisions" approach at the major league level? The lack of power from this team is striking, even from the actual power hitters. This team has hit 4 home runs in 10 games. Now maybe they're all off to slow starts, but at some point you have to question is this part of the process? 

It’s a good question, but at the end of the day, ten games is not the point to do this.  Two months?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are first in the AL in strikeouts too.

I'm curious, does someone have a way to see if those are mostly swinging vs looking?  I'd be curious to know what that fraction is.  And if we compare it to previous seasons, that might really tell us if this is a systemic change from the big focus on 'swing decisions.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s a good question, but at the end of the day, ten games is not the point to do this.  Two months?

Very true. It's way too early to draw any conclusions on anything right now, but it's certainly not a good start to the two-headed hitting coaches career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Aglets said:

We are first in the AL in strikeouts too.

I'm curious, does someone have a way to see if those are mostly swinging vs looking?  I'd be curious to know what that fraction is.  And if we compare it to previous seasons, that might really tell us if this is a systemic change from the big focus on 'swing decisions.'

This sounds like an effect from the new swing decision philosophy. If the pitch in not a ball the batter can drive don't swing.   So deeper counts. More walks and more strikeouts.  

Kind of the opposite from the 10 pitch at bat the other day by Chirinos where he fouled off pitches he could not drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aglets said:

We are first in the AL in strikeouts too.

I'm curious, does someone have a way to see if those are mostly swinging vs looking?  I'd be curious to know what that fraction is.  And if we compare it to previous seasons, that might really tell us if this is a systemic change from the big focus on 'swing decisions.'

17.3% looking, compared to 21.8% last year.   In a sample of only 10 games (and 110 strikeouts), that’s not enough of a difference to be statistically meaningful yet.  

To get this info, go to the BB-ref page for Orioles 2022, click on Detailed Stats, then on Team Pitches Batting, and see the column L/SO%.   Then do the same for 2021.   Here’s the 2022 Detailed Stats page: https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/2021-batting.shtml

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Very true. It's way too early to draw any conclusions on anything right now, but it's certainly not a good start to the two-headed hitting coaches career.

I’m sure they’re feeling nervous about the lack of early success.   I know I would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, interloper said:

Mullins, Mancini, Hays, Mountcastle, Santander, Chirinos are all ML talent. They're just not hitting. 

The problem is there are three to four spots in the lineup everyday taken by replacement level or below replacement bats.  Chirinos is a major league backup catcher.  At this point in his career, there is not much left in the bat. 

So that's five guys who can hit when things are going right and four guys who are close to being automatic outs, especially against good pitching.  It limits the upside of the entire lineup tremendously. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

The problem is there are three to four spots in the lineup everyday taken by replacement level or below replacement bats.  Chirinos is a major league backup catcher.  At this point in his career, there is not much left in the bat. 

So that's five guys who can hit when things are going right and four guys who are close to being automatic outs, especially against good pitching.  It limits the upside of the entire lineup tremendously. 

No argument there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, this isn't an excuse at all, but I don't know how anybody hits anything in today's game just looking at the pitchers through these first few series. It's like, even if you're 3-2, the guy is gonna have 97 on the corner or a slider off the edge with, like, a 6 foot break. So good luck deciding which it is in less than a second. Just seems like such a tall order to ever square anybody up, and when they have it's been right at somebody. 

And the pitching won't really get all that easier. It's just today's game. Even the O's have pitchers like this now if you look at the bullpen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It’s too early to tell on the walks, I agree. 
 

But on the flip side, I don’t think you could point to any 10 game stretch over the past 4 years where they lead the league in walks. So that’s a positive. 
 

Ain’t that right @wildcard?

I'll walk away from that question.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • They are a bunch of simp libtards now, you'd fit in well
    • Trade for trout while his is stock is low. Bit of a gamble, but he's a leader that needs a change of scenery. He is our RF/ DH middle of the order RH bat to replace santander  If we can keep him healthy, he might be the veteran presence we need. We have the salary space for his contract 
    • I'm rooting against the Yankees this weekend. Hasn't gotten close to that point for me. The 2016 WC game was the worst because of the Britton situation. The 2014 Royals series was awful. I don't know that this loss was even as bad as last year's vs the Rangers where it felt like we could go all the way. This was just a wild card team vs a wild card team that could go either way, and some bounces didn't go our way and young players couldn't handle the pressure. It's best-of-3, it happens.
    • I'm older than most here. The pain of being a sports fan in Baltimore in 1969 make this year's playoff sweep seem trivial. All three of our local pro teams had great regular seasons. The Colts were a sure thing to beat the upstart Jets in Super Bowl III. No way the mighty Orioles would lose to the Mets in the World Series. And I thought for sure the Bullets might beat the Knicks in the NBA semifinals. Talk about long lasting pain ...
    • Come on man, that's a crock. I've been as frustrated as anyone watching Adley's approach at the plate and his uppercut swing. But to say he's the kind of guy that makes excuses is way out of line. I have no doubt Adley will work on getting his body, swing and mind right in the off-season. 
    • I was given three free tix to see them in Durham in '23. They oversold the tix, ie. the seats were not assigned, first come / first serve,  the line to get in was ridiculously long, and we had to stand in the miserable heat and humidity of a NC summer.  Worst baseball in person experience of my life. Just goofy from the little I got to see in the three person deep standing room only crowd. We left after three innings or whatever they call it in their version of the game. Way too loud, too. Just too much BS going on. It was like the baseball version of drinking WAY too much gin and fruit punch and the wild colors give you the bed spins. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...