Jump to content

Adley is in the Show!


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

I am definitely not saying to send him down but honest question: what would it take to get a demotion to Norfolk?

Publicly disclosing whatever it is that Owings has on some Orioles executive. (Did you expect an honest answer?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/5/2022 at 3:11 PM, amdcpus said:

Sorry but I've never been impressed by this guy. 24.5 and stinking it up so far. 38 year old kurt suzuki is even hitting 640 OPS as Angels catcher

 

46 minutes ago, amdcpus said:

This guy is terrible I'm sorry to say. His numbers in the minors were not impressive whatsoever either. Looking more and more like a bust. 24.5 years old and looks like a AAA player at best

You sound sorry and unimpressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've watched some of his at bats but not all of them, and I am in no way a scout, so I have the following questions:  (1) is Adley hitting into bad luck (making good contact but unlucky with where the ball is going)?  (2) Are pitchers making better pitches to Adley than they are to other Orioles' hitters, or is Adley failing to take advantage of hittable pitches coming his way?  

A scout or very knowledgeable fan who has watched his at bats might be able to answer these questions.  I suspect that the right data analytics could also answer these questions.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m noticing that Adley’s hitting a lot of balls off the lower end of the bat.  His stance is kind of interesting.   He doesn’t have his hands all the way back.  I feel like his timing is just a little off but once he gets rolling he’ll be fine.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m noticing that Adley’s hitting a lot of balls off the lower end of the bat.  His stance is kind of interesting.   He doesn’t have his hands all the way back.  I feel like his timing is just a little off but once he gets rolling he’ll be fine.  

Here it is again that new OH term developed for Adley: "he'll be fine"

I'll ask again is "fine" what you would expect from a 1-1?

I still hope/expect that he will be a competent ML catcher, but he is definitely not what  I  wanted at 1-1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Here it is again that new OH term developed for Adley: "he'll be fine"

I'll ask again is "fine" what you would expect from a 1-1?

I still hope/expect that he will be a competent ML catcher, but he is definitely not what  I  wanted at 1-1

 

I can pretty easily draw a line: appreciably better than Matt Wieters.  Matt was a competent, somewhat above average major league catcher.   If Rutschman isn’t more than that, I’ll consider him disappointing.  Am I supposed to judge whether he’ll become that based on 2.5 weeks?    That’s preposterous.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I can pretty easily draw a line: appreciably better than Matt Wieters.  Matt was a competent, somewhat above average major league catcher.   If Rutschman isn’t more than that, I’ll consider him disappointing.  Am I supposed to judge whether he’ll become that based on 2.5 weeks?    That’s preposterous.  

I am waiting for next Thursday at 10 PM. See if he is a bust or not. So far of the top prospects only Rodriguez has been good. Witt has shown flashes but slumping again. Torkelson has not been good .TIme will tell which player becomes any good or a few turn into nothing. Much too soon for all of them. The rest are a few years younger then Adley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I can pretty easily draw a line: appreciably better than Matt Wieters.  Matt was a competent, somewhat above average major league catcher.   If Rutschman isn’t more than that, I’ll consider him disappointing.  Am I supposed to judge whether he’ll become that based on 2.5 weeks?    That’s preposterous.  

Nope I didn't say anything about a time scale

Just wondering what fine is, and I appreciate the better than Matt Wieters definition.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Nope I didn't say anything about a time scale

Just wondering what fine is, and I appreciate the better than Matt Wieters definition.

 

Objectively, I could argue that “good as Matt Wieters” should be good enough.  Only 24 1-1 picks have exceeded Wieters’ 18.3 rWAR, so that’s about the median outcome for a 1-1.   Emotionally, I can’t make that argument.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...