Jump to content

Rutschman vs Witt


Filmstudy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I think the C position is overrated.  Yes, getting premium offense out of that position is harder than anywhere else, that I agree with.  But the defensive side of things means something to me and I think C defense is way overrated.

 

Doesn't that fact alone make a good hitting catcher more valuable than a similar hitting SS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Doesn't that fact alone make a good hitting catcher more valuable than a similar hitting SS?

Defense matters.  Longevity at position matters.  If the question is, who do you want the next 4-5 years, I probably take Adley but I’m looking at it longer than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I think the C position is overrated.  Yes, getting premium offense out of that position is harder than anywhere else, that I agree with.  But the defensive side of things means something to me and I think C defense is way overrated.

 

By whom? Just general conventional wisdom? Both Fangraphs and Bbref agree C has bigger positional adjustment (Fangraphs is slightly higher). Not sure whether that comes from offense or defense. I've been watching a lot of little league this summer and I have definitely come to appreciate the catcher position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think both of these guys will be good players and don’t need to debate the pick. I am happy to see Adley’s work behind the plate and hope that he quickly becomes the .300 ish hitter that I was expecting. The key hits are nice but seeing the #1 prospect in baseball hitting .218 kinda stinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

By whom? Just general conventional wisdom? Both Fangraphs and Bbref agree C has bigger positional adjustment (Fangraphs is slightly higher). Not sure whether that comes from offense or defense. I've been watching a lot of little league this summer and I have definitely come to appreciate the catcher position. 

I said..I THINK.  Did you just choose to not read that?

And I’m glad you are letting 8-12 year olds formulate your opinion on the importance of a baseball position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I said..I THINK.  Did you just choose to not read that?

And I’m glad you are letting 8-12 year olds formulate your opinion on the importance of a baseball position.  

How does "I think" clarify what/who you meant by overrated? Ah well, if you're going all caps on me, just have a nice day.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I said..I THINK.  Did you just choose to not read that?

And I’m glad you are letting 8-12 year olds formulate your opinion on the importance of a baseball position.  

You think.   So you think Baseball Reference and Fangraphs are wrong and you're right.   Fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

You think.   So you think Baseball Reference and Fangraphs are wrong and you're right.   Fair enough.

Never said that.  I just think the way C defense (not offense) is evaluated is wrong.  And I think if I’m looking over a 10 year period, I prefer the guy who is far younger and isn’t playing the grueling position of C.  
 

It’s that simple.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Never said that.  I just think the way C defense (not offense) is evaluated is wrong.  And I think if I’m looking over a 10 year period, I prefer the guy who is far younger and isn’t playing the grueling position of C.  
 

It’s that simple.  

And it's wrong to look over a 10 year period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Never said that.  I just think the way C defense (not offense) is evaluated is wrong.  And I think if I’m looking over a 10 year period, I prefer the guy who is far younger and isn’t playing the grueling position of C.  
 

It’s that simple.  

You didn't say that?   Baseball Reference and Fangraphs put more value on the catching position.   Aren't you saying that you disagree with that?   If you disagree with that then you are saying that you think they are wrong.    You're doing that thing again.   Both sides of the mouth.   Saying on thing out the right side and another thing out of the left side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

You didn't say that.   Baseball Reference and Fangraphs put more value on the catching position.   Aren't you saying that you disagree with that?   If you disagree with that then you are saying that you think they are wrong.    You're doing that thing again.   Both sides of the mouth.   Saying on thing out the right side and another thing out of the left side.

I’m saying that I think the defense is overrated.  When they are giving their positional values(the +7.5, +2.5 scale), my understanding is that is for offense.  I’m not disagreeing with the offense.

But the value I put on the defense is high and negates that offensive advantage.  Not to mention the age difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

I’m saying that I think the defense is overrated.  When they are giving their positional values(the +7.5, +2.5 scale), my understanding is that is for offense.  I’m not disagreeing with the offense.

But the value I put on the defense is high and negates that offensive advantage.  Not to mention the age difference.

Ok.  No problem.  So you think they are wrong as far as the defensive value they attach to the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Now overall I notice 29 K's in 17 innings. That ratio of 1.7 is top of the line for a starter!
    • Urias looks pretty cooked too though, and he's not providing the kind of defensive flexibility that Mateo is, and he doesn't have very good splits for platooning.  At least for 2023 and 2024 Mateo has had good platoon splits.
    • SSS but Holliday was playing incredible defense after like the first game or two when he seemed to have some jitters.  He had +3 OAA in a very short span.  Mateo has looked a little awkward at 2nd to be honest, and he's not the best at making the double play turn.
    • Hoping for a speedy recovery. That all happened fast. Not my initial impression reading the write up.
    • McCann looks cooked but he's in his last year and our options at backup C aren't great unless we're willing to trade for one.  But I'm not giving up a lot for a backup C.   I'd like to find a replacement for Urias.  He didn't look great last year and he's being thrust into a role that he's not really cut out for right now.  I don't think he's getting the 2022 magic back.  Maybe Westburg can go to 3rd full time and one of our 5 AAA 2nd basemen can work in with Mateo at 2nd.
    • I quoted myself, because I wanted to share something with you all.  I have memory issues.  Nothing full blown or anything, but I don't recall things nearly as well as I once did.  I mention this because it occurred to me that I posted a very similar thing about McCann last year, and he performed notably better in the 2nd half.  At least I believe so.   It's not that I feel I'm exactly wrong about McCann, but rather that he showed himself to be better just last season and could do so again.  I hope so. Memory issues are nothing to be ashamed of, though I'd be pretending if it didn't bother me.  I've been dealing with this for maybe five years or so, though it gets worse every year.  At 59, that's younger than most that have such issues.   I'm sure in a forum as populated as this one, there could be others going through what I am.  It is what it is... it's life, and I hope you're all doing your best with it. 
    • Estrada and Tejada both continued their recent surges today.  Estrada was 2 for 4 with a double, while Tejada was 3 for 3  with a homer.  Tejada has his OPS up to .737, not bad for a league where .654 is average.  Estrada is at .628 and climbing.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...