Jump to content

Orioles 2022 #3 Prospect Jackson Holliday - SS


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, but it wasn’t an injury that should affect his prospect status in July 2024.   

I think that if you have two guys that you view as close and one does well and the other has a fairly serious surgery before playing a game both factors are going to skew your view to some degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I was listening to the MLB Pipeline podcast last week, and someone posed the question “who will be the no. 1 prospect in July 2024?”   Both Jonathan Mayo and Jim Callis predicted it would be Holliday.   It’s interesting that although it seemed like Druw Jones was the favorite pundit choice to be worthy of the 1:1 pick, Holliday seems to have picked up a lot of buzz since the Orioles picked him and he got his feet wet in pro ball.   

I need to go listen.  But I wonder how much of that is related to the O's development system.  Specifically, are Mayo/Callis (and other outside professionals?) seeing and buying into the type of prospect that we target and the development system that gets the most out of the talent?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think that if you have two guys that you view as close and one does well and the other has a fairly serious surgery before playing a game both factors are going to skew your view to some degree.

I guess it’s possible.  This seems to be a surgery (posterior labrum tear on non-throwing shoulder) that hasn’t hampered players too much, but you never know.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I was listening to the MLB Pipeline podcast last week, and someone posed the question “who will be the no. 1 prospect in July 2024?”   Both Jonathan Mayo and Jim Callis predicted it would be Holliday.   It’s interesting that although it seemed like Druw Jones was the favorite pundit choice to be worthy of the 1:1 pick, Holliday seems to have picked up a lot of buzz since the Orioles picked him and he got his feet wet in pro ball.   

From what I recall the big question around Jones was his ability to hit meanwhile there were no questions on Holliday's hitting ability. For me, that always made him the logical choice between the two. I'm guessing now that people have seen his approach at the plate against better competition they feel more confident in him. Plus, Jones hasn't played so he hasn't had a chance to increase his stock it's just stayed where it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

I need to go listen.  But I wonder how much of that is related to the O's development system.  Specifically, are Mayo/Callis (and other outside professionals?) seeing and buying into the type of prospect that we target and the development system that gets the most out of the talent?  

The podcast is here:  https://www.stitcher.com/show/mlb-pipeline/episode/putting-a-bow-on-the-afl-208556272  The relevant portion begins at about the 73:45 mark, right towards the end of the podcast.  Mayo and Callis actually each named their top 5.   Jones was no. 2 on both lists; Termarr Johnson was no. 5 for Mayo and no. 3 for Callis.  Callis also commented that he thinks Holliday is going to be so good that he may already be in the majors by July 2024.  That would be a nice turn of events!

By the way, this same podcast features a lengthy interview with Heston Kjerstad, starting at the 35:00 mark. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, btdart20 said:

@Tony-OH Was there any thought of having Holliday ahead of Grayson?

Holliday could have a higher ceiling, but considering Rodriguez is so close, I never seriously considered putting him ahead. That's not to say that Holliday may not end up the best of all three, just that Henderson and Holliday are so close it would hard take him over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Holliday could have a higher ceiling, but considering Rodriguez is so close, I never seriously considered putting him ahead. That's not to say that Holliday may not end up the best of all three, just that Henderson and Holliday are so close it would hard take him over them.

Wow, that's highest praise. Hard to believe it, but bring it on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
9 hours ago, EddeeEddee said:

FWIW on the embedded video I did hear the announcer opine it was another wind-aided HR, and it was a lofty trajectory.

Regardless, 1-1 looking like 1-1!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...