Jump to content

Baltimore Sun: Orioles lost more than they won because of LF wall


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, deward said:

I don't believe for a minute that this team, as currently constructed, wouldn't be winning a ton of games with the old configuration. I'm also still waiting for the promised influx of free-agent pitchers climbing over the gates to come pitch in front of the new wall.

I kind of feel this way too. The Wall, IMO, inspires confidence in our pitchers which is invaluable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tntoriole said:

Quirky .. that far corner near Mr Splash will see lots of exciting balls rattling around in there with strange angles and bounces.  You wonder if triples to left have gone up? 

Has there been a big uptick in triples to LF in the last two years? I haven't noticed it. This team hits more triples than some past O's teams because they're young and fast, but I can't recall very many, if any, instances of what you're describing. Perhaps I've missed some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't know that I'd be against them having so much confidence that they metamorphosize into some kind of invincible and superhuman .

I've watched enough games against the Yankees and Red Sox in Camden Yards over the years to know our SP's rarely if ever looked confident. Having the Wall I think helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, deward said:

Has there been a big uptick in triples to LF in the last two years? I haven't noticed it. This team hits more triples than some past O's teams because they're young and fast, but I can't recall very many, if any, instances of what you're describing. Perhaps I've missed some.

So triples by the Orioles at OPACY since 2017: 4, 5, 16, 3, 8, 9, 13.

Opponents at OPACY: 8, 15, 11, 5, 10, 6, 10

If there's an obvious trend there I'm not seeing it. Most triples go to CF/RC/RF. The wall probably increases triples by two a season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, deward said:

Has there been a big uptick in triples to LF in the last two years? I haven't noticed it. This team hits more triples than some past O's teams because they're young and fast, but I can't recall very many, if any, instances of what you're describing. Perhaps I've missed some.

Some people liked the years of barely over the LF fence  homers .. not my favorite part of the game .. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tntoriole said:

Some people liked the years of barely over the LF fence  homers .. not my favorite part of the game .. 

That's an aesthetic preference, which is fine. I've just been irked by most of the narratives around the impact of the wall on the fortunes of the team, which I think are overblown myth-making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, deward said:

That's an aesthetic preference, which is fine. I've just been irked by most of the narratives around the impact of the wall on the fortunes of the team, which I think are overblown myth-making.

It works both ways .. yes the team is markedly better but you also can’t know how this same group would do pre and post wall.. because the getting better was only after the wall was already in place. 
If the wall was returned to its previous place for next year, then that would be a more accurate measure of how it affects the hitting and pitching stats of this squad of players.

But wall is in place ..and they are winning for whatever reasons . I am fine with it. 

Edited by tntoriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...