Jump to content

Orioles interested in Syndergaard?


Snutchy

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He is 30.  Using his age against is pretty far fetched.   Without the “ifs” he was 2.2 fwar last year.   Your boy, Chris Bassitt was 2.7 fwar and turns 34 before next season which makes your argument against Syndergaard look pretty silly.

Chris Bassitt is hardly my boy.  Thats just dumb to say.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I am so if that makes him my boy, I'm signing up! 

I'd go 4-years and worry about the 4th year when we get there if it was needed.

No problem. I’m not against Bassitt.  Just against someone using age to argue against the 30-year old Syndergaard while simultaneously endorsing the soon to be 34-year old Bassitt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

No problem. I’m not against Bassitt.  Just against someone using age to argue against the 30-year old Syndergaard while simultaneously endorsing the soon to be 34-year old Bassitt.

I'm not part of that discussion/argument, but just wanted to put my two cents into signing Bassitt again. lol

I'm also not against Syndergaard for the right price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

No problem. I’m not against Bassitt.  Just against someone using age to argue against the 30-year old Syndergaard while simultaneously endorsing the soon to be 34-year old Bassitt.

I didn’t use age against him other to say that he is coming off a major surgery and saw his stuff diminish and that doesn’t usually get better as you get beyond 30.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Syndergaard is 4 years younger, probably signs for fewer years and lower AAV than Bassitt, was worth 2.2 WAR focusing on CV/SL and 2S but still throws 94.5. Not unreasonable to think he could add a tick to 4S with another year away from TJS and we seem to be good at refining CH and pitch selection. If the 3 yr, $36 M estimate is close to real, I would vote yes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m surprised that so many people are open to Syndergaard while so many people are disappointed by the Gibson signing. Both would be short term solutions and would offer similar results.

Anyways, I hope Syndergaard is off the table now that Gibson was signed.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dzorange said:

I’m surprised that so many people are open to Syndergaard while so many people are disappointed by the Gibson signing. Both would be short term solutions and would offer similar results.

Anyways, I hope Syndergaard is off the table now that Gibson was signed.

I assume part of it is name recognition. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

I have no problem looking at Syndergaard as a possible secondary move for our pitching staff.  I’d be disappointed if he was our biggest pitching signing of the offseason.   

Now that Gibson is signed, I don’t really want a Syndergaard signing.  We should be aiming higher.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, dzorange said:

I’m surprised that so many people are open to Syndergaard while so many people are disappointed by the Gibson signing. Both would be short term solutions and would offer similar results.

Anyways, I hope Syndergaard is off the table now that Gibson was signed.

Syndergaard is better than Gibson and also has more upside. They would fit nicely as 4/5 in the rotation but they cannot be the best 2 signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, dzorange said:

I’m surprised that so many people are open to Syndergaard while so many people are disappointed by the Gibson signing. Both would be short term solutions and would offer similar results.

Anyways, I hope Syndergaard is off the table now that Gibson was signed.

I think it's likely that Gibson will give comparable production to Syndergaard at a fraction of the price.  Syndergaard is a shadow of what he was before injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...