Jump to content

Reliever FA preferences


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Roch this morning had this detail.

I’d expect the Orioles to add at least one reliever before opening day, though it isn’t publicized as a pressing need.

The bullpen was a surprising strength in 2022, but it’s reckless to bank on the exact same numbers from a group that was largely unproven.

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/same-business-on-tap-for-orioles-at-winter-meetings

To the extent Roch Kremlin-ology adjusts for him working for a team-adjacent media entity, its a little interesting anything he'd say to raise expectations with his readers.

Anyhow, RP's being streamed by teams so heavily, some familiar names are out there.     Mychal Givens is one from maybe the Lyles-Gibson-Bassitt WYSIWYG shelf, and Zack Britton is one from the Andrew Heaney "do you feel lucky" shelf.     One near the top of the market, but at least coming off a bad ERA year like Kyle Gibson, is Taylor Rogers.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rule 5.   I understand the idea of regression but who do you get rid of?   Cionel Perez?  Bautista?   I don’t think so.  Our guys are fairly young and cheap.  If we acquire another starter, it looks like Wells goes to the pen.   That’s good enough for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Rule 5.   I understand the idea of regression but who do you get rid of?   Cionel Perez?  Bautista?   I don’t think so.  Our guys are fairly young and cheap.  If we acquire another starter, it looks like Wells goes to the pen.   That’s good enough for me.

Or you find another minor-league free agent with decent stuff and you coach them up like Perez.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khreibel, Baker, Akin, and Wells have options.  Middle relief is where the pen really started to break down last year. Especially Khreibel. At first, I thought it would be a terrible idea to spend and FA money on a reliever, but another vet to add to MR would be nice considering we’re about to plan on heavily relying on the pen again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cionel might be a sneaky sell-high trade candidate. Do we really think he can replicate his 2022? Maybe Brewers like him to replace Hader and he's part of a package for Woodruff. Baseballtradevalues has him at 8.7, not far behind Mayo, for example. 

I coveted Brad Boxberger last year and would still love to have him. Last year he went for $2.5M. Seems like a no brainer. Seth Lugo might be another. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOCKS

Bautista 

Perez

Tate 

Baker 

Voth

 

Assuming they have an 8 man pen that’s 3 spots. 

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Khreibel, Baker, Akin, and Wells have options.  Middle relief is where the pen really started to break down last year. Especially Khreibel. At first, I thought it would be a terrible idea to spend and FA money on a reliever, but another vet to add to MR would be nice considering we’re about to plan on heavily relying on the pen again. 

Obviously how rotation plays out matters. Khreibel and Akin as mentioned have options. Are they willing to put Hall in the pen? They may want him starting which at least at the start of the season means back to AAA.  
 

I can’t see them spending much money on a pen arm. So it would have to be someone off an injury or poor season or a non closer type. Probably the latter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

LOCKS

Bautista 

Perez

Tate 

Baker 

Voth

 

Assuming they have an 8 man pen that’s 3 spots. 

Obviously how rotation plays out matters. Khreibel and Akin as mentioned have options. Are they willing to put Hall in the pen? They may want him starting which at least at the start of the season means back to AAA.  
 

I can’t see them spending much money on a pen arm. So it would have to be someone off an injury or poor season or a non closer type. Probably the latter. 

Akin is another I would consider putting out there as an available trade asset. Based on how they used him, Hyde does not seem to trust him at all. This is just a gut feeling but I am not expecting him to sustain that ERA. The Simulator has him as a 5.5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

Akin is another I would consider putting out there as an available trade asset. Based on how they used him, Hyde does not seem to trust him at all. This is just a gut feeling but I am not expecting him to sustain that ERA. The Simulator has him as a 5.5. 

He would either have to be a part of a package or you are getting a very low level prospect or similar player in return. His K rate went down as season went on. I think he is best served as more of long man/middle type. Teams need those types. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

He would either have to be a part of a package or you are getting a very low level prospect or similar player in return. His K rate went down as season went on. I think he is best served as more of long man/middle type. Teams need those types. 

Yes, I am proposing part of a package in a Snell or Woodruff deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eddie83 said:

One more thing I would add is I think would like a lefty long man type. I think Akin fits better in that role than bringing him in with traffic on the bases. If I am correct then you are basically looking to upgrade Khreibel spot. 

I think DL Hall could be this guy if they decide to keep him as a reliever this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...