Jump to content

It’s mostly about the pitching (2023 version)


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Seems like we have a thread like this pretty much every year, which is why I labeled this “2023 version.”

Looking at the Fangraphs positional power rankings and various other projections and commentaries, it seems that a lot of outside observers are expecting our pitching to regress this year.   Fangraphs, for example, ranks our rotation 28th, and our bullpen 21st.  

So, I think as the pitching goes, so will go the Orioles.   Personally, I feel pretty optimistic about the rotation.  I expect some ERA increase from Kremer but still think he’ll be very solid.  I think Bradish will be closer to the post-injury version than the pre-injury version.  I’m expecting solid if unspectacular years from Gibson and Irvin.  Wells should be fine if healthy.  And then there’s GRod and Hall waiting in the wings, with Means hopefully available in the second half.  I feel more confident in this group than I did going into 2022.

I’m less sanguine about the bullpen.  They beat expectations by a lot last year, and their position in save rate (78%, tops in the AL) far outpaced their leaguewide rank in ERA (3.49, 7th in the AL).   So, they got a lot of breaks in 2022, and my guess is their bottom line results won’t be as good in 2023.   I’m confident in The Mountain but I think we’ll see some strain in the middle relief/set-up guys.   Having Tate and Givens out to start the year definitely doesn’t help.  

Anyway, I think we’ll need to beat the “expert” predictions by a substantial margin in order to be a playoff team.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.  We were more competitive last year because our pitching exceeded expectations.  This year I feel our rotation is improved but am concerned about the pen.  Hopefully depth will help.  But for this team to be a playoff team, it's going to have to pitch like one.

Last year for the most part it did...fingers crossed.  Let's go.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't lie, I'm very concerned about not having Tate in the bullpen for a month or 2. Tate was our most reliable reliever. Hyde could always count on him to get the job done. I thought Givens could fill the gap, but now Givens is injured too.

Someone is going to have to seriously step up for the bullpen.

I'm also convinced that Tyler Wells has a limited number of innings he can be effective. We've seen what happened last year once he got beyond a certain threshold. (He got injured.) I think that after a couple months, we might see either Voth, Baumann, Hall, or Rodriguez take some starts in that rotation spot. Who it is, depends on how Rodriguez and Hall are doing in Norfolk. If one of them is dominating, that's who will get the call.

Edited by Billy F-Face3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On balance I think it's fair to expect the improved rotation and regressed bullpen will even out, so pitching overall for the team will remain about the same.

Meanwhile the hitting should definitely improve!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I won't lie, I'm very concerned about not having Tate in the bullpen for a month or 2. Tate was our most reliable reliever. Hyde could always count on him to get the job done. I thought Givens could fill the gap, but now Givens is injured too.

Someone is going to have to seriously step up for the bullpen.

I'm also convinced that Tyler Wells has a limited number of innings he can be effective. We've seen what happened last year once he got beyond a certain threshold. (He got injured.) I think that after a couple months, we might see either Voth, Baumann, Hall, or Rodriguez take some starts in that rotation spot. Who it is, depends on how Rodriguez and Hall are doing in Norfolk. If one of them is dominating, that's who will get the call.

We should all be very concerned if it takes two months for Rodriguez to get back to the big leagues. That would mean that he's struggling to dominate at AAA, which would mean that something isn't right with him.

I've said in other threads, I think we're going to find out that at least a couple out of the Bradish/Kremer/Voth/Baker/Perez group were pitching over their heads last year. On a big picture level, for a team that wants to be like Houston and Tampa, the starting pitching pipeline is distressingly thin. As much credit as Elias gets for building up the farm system, it seems fair to ding him a bit for the fact that, after four years, the only two starting prospects that might be ready to help the team are ones he inherited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, deward said:

We should all be very concerned if it takes two months for Rodriguez to get back to the big leagues. That would mean that he's struggling to dominate at AAA, which would mean that something isn't right with him.

I've said in other threads, I think we're going to find out that at least a couple out of the Bradish/Kremer/Voth/Baker/Perez group were pitching over their heads last year. On a big picture level, for a team that wants to be like Houston and Tampa, the starting pitching pipeline is distressingly thin. As much credit as Elias gets for building up the farm system, it seems fair to ding him a bit for the fact that, after four years, the only two starting prospects that might be ready to help the team are ones he inherited. 

The Orioles don't spend any draft capital on pitchers. Carter Baulmer (Pick 133 with 1.5M signing Bonus) was the biggest one. MeLean was the first top 100 pick spent, but failed to sign.

Either they were so arrogant they they could develop starting pitching from scratch? (The Rays and Guardians will spend draft capital on pitchers and they have a proven system)

or the plan has always been solid young core of hitters and trading/fa signing for pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Scalious said:

The Orioles don't spend any draft capital on pitchers. Carter Baulmer (Pick 133 with 1.5M signing Bonus) was the biggest one. MeLean was the first top 100 pick spent, but failed to sign.

Either they were so arrogant they they could develop starting pitching from scratch? (The Rays and Guardians will spend draft capital on pitchers and they have a proven system)

or the plan has always been solid young core of hitters and trading/fa signing for pitching.

Acquiring pitching externally rather than through the draft might be the plan, but it's not happening yet. Tampa seems to be able to produce some new impact pitcher almost at will; Elias needs to be able to do the same if he intends to build a perennial contender on a shoestring budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...