Jump to content

Mother's Day: Orioles go for a sweep of the Pirates


SteveA

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

I know rookies struggle but that is a hugely epic amount of total suck.  Hard to live with that.  

Is it though?  It's a week's worth of at bats if he was playing full time.  Not really a lot.  I'll bet almost any hall of famer you might name had a 2 for 28 stretch at one point in their career.

(No, I'm not saying Stowers is a HOFer and I am fully aware how bad he has looked in those 28 ABs.  Just saying it's really a pretty small sample to be making major judgements on).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

I can't wait until MLB goes to an auto strike zone system. I have noticed so many pitches off the plate being called strikes this year. 

I think MLB might be backing off the robo ump.  Been hearing they are going to a challenge system in the minors to test how that goes.  Each team will get two strikes a game to challenge.  Seems just a weak way to avoid the real subject.....that they need to just go all the way and bring in the robo ump.  

NO one pays to see umpires get calls wrong and say "oh the human element.......its a part of the game"  The game began in the 1860's and we had no choice but use frail humans.   If the game was created today they would already use the robo ump.  Umps getting it wrong is not "just part of the game"  it sucks is what it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Is it though?  It's a week's worth of at bats if he was playing full time.  Not really a lot.  I'll bet almost any hall of famer you might name had a 2 for 28 stretch at one point in their career.

(No, I'm not saying Stowers is a HOFer and I am fully aware how bad he has looked in those 28 ABs.  Just saying it's really a pretty small sample to be making major judgements on).

In his last 6 games with plate appearances Stowers is 0-18 with 6 K's. Playoff teams need players who can produce, and he just isn't cutting it. The O's don't have to give up on him, but they also can't afford to throw away ABs for a player who struggles to hit ML pitching.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I know right?  How'd he ever get the two?

I honestly cant remember him getting any hits.  And I have watched every game of the year.(sometimes I am not paying total attention)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...