Jump to content

Mother's Day: Orioles go for a sweep of the Pirates


SteveA

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I guess if he gets on it brings you closer to the tying run.  I think you'd feel better if he just didn't come to the park on certain days.  No batting practice. No drills. Nothing.

Let's say Adley hits a dong.

Run expectancy with 0 on and 2 outs is 09897.  The chance to score one run is 4.48294%, the chance to score 2 is 1.47986%.  And that's after Adley pinch hits a HR.

I don't want the players to give up.

The manager on the other hand I'm fine with taking a longer view.

 

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Let's say Adley hits a dong.

Run expectancy with 0 on and 2 outs is 09897.  The chance to score one run is 4.48294%, the chance to score 2 is 1.47986%.  And that's after Adley pinch hits a HR.

I don't want the players to give up.

The manager on the other hand I'm fine with taking a longer view.

 

Do you want Adley to skip batting practice on his day off?  I guarantee you that he used more energy pre-game than he did in one AB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yossarian said:

Since when did saying the tying run is in the on deck circle become a thing?

There's even the expression "in the hole" (viz. in the dugout) instead of "on-deck" to say that the next batter after the one on-deck is the potential tie (or go-ahead) run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LA2 said:

There's even the expression "in the hole" (viz. in the dugout) instead of "on-deck" to say that the next batter after the one on-deck is the potential tie (or go-ahead) run.

Yes, I'm aware of the expressions "on deck" and "in the hole".  They have been used for decades.   I get that. 

I just don't remember making a point to say the tying run is on deck when a team is 4 runs down.   I can understand when a guy comes to the plate and "represents the tying run".  It just doesn't seem noteworthy to be down 4 runs and say a guy not even batting represents the tying run.   At that point,  it seems just as noteworthy to be down 6 runs in the last inning and say the 6th guy due up in the inning represents the tying run.  There is a lot that has to happen before that becomes noteworthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • He is a great story. We will have to continue to make room for him because he is the 90% outcome for many behind him. 
    • I think Cal's record was able to happen because of a time in O's history when there was no strong manager.  I doubt Cal's streak would have made it to one season if he had played his whole season under Weaver.  Weaver was way ahead of his time on matchups, platoons and resting players.  The  bigger thing about Cal's streak, imo was that it was allowed to happen, where it took on a life of it's own, dwarfing the team.  I'm not diminishing the feat, but there's rarely a player that plays 162 games in a year now.  It's just recognized that people wear down and need rest.  I want to say to that probably the 5 players behind Cal on the streak list did things to basically cheat and prolong their streak especially Gehrig, where he would hit once and then not play the rest of the game. 
    • Goes right back to Ted Williams. Get a good pitch to hit and drive it.
    • There was an attempt to debunk this article in the other O'Hearn thread where it's the OP, but in it O'Hearn explains that his efforts to change launch angle and severely limit when he swings underlie the improved performance since coming to the Orioles.  
    • I'm thinking that Suarez can be that extra high leverage arm the O's need.  Someone who can take some of the closing pressure off Kimbrel.  No, Hyde, the closer doesn't have to get every save.  I hate when Hyde uses every high leverage arm in a single game then the next game you just have the B squad. 
    • Would have been nice for his campaign if he had been allowed to go 8 or even go for the shutout. 
    • He looked much more pull happy when he was up, with bigger leg lift. In the minors he seem to handle pitches away much better, taking them to left and left center.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...