Jump to content

Gregg Olson Review


accinfo

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Yep me too. And he did it for both sides. I’ve wondered if MASNs graphic needs to be recalibrated. A lot of times it looks bad on tv but Ump Scorecard will have it being much less egregious  

 

The top of the MASN box is too low.  The strike zone is defined as the midpoint between the top of the uniform pants and the top of the shoulder.  But the box MASN puts up is barely above the top of the uniform pants, if at all.

On the other hand, the problem with the ump yesterday was inside/outside, not up/down, for the most part.  I’m expecting a bad report from Ump Scorecard today.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if the placement of the pitch location circles is at the front edge or back point of home plate?

Somebody with a great diving curve like Gregg Olson, even that ~1-2 foot depth of the plate the height could change some.     A well located pitch is usually near that strike-ball border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The top of the MASN box is too low.  The strike zone is defined as the midpoint between the top of the uniform pants and the top of the shoulder.  But the box MASN puts up is barely above the top of the uniform pants, if at all.

On the other hand, the problem with the ump yesterday was inside/outside, not up/down, for the most part.  I’m expecting a bad report from Ump Scorecard today.  

It curious how the ump sits directly behind the inside corner instead of the middle of the plate.  He’s got a bad view of the outside corner.  He setup there whether the catcher was directly in front of him or not.  Do they all do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

It curious how the ump sits directly behind the inside corner instead of the middle of the plate.  He’s got a bad view of the outside corner.  He setup there whether the catcher was directly in front of him or not.  Do they all do that?

I believe it’s because it’s easier to see the plate from over the catcher’s shoulder than from over the top of his head.  But obviously. It does distort the perspective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I believe it’s because it’s easier to see the plate from over the catcher’s shoulder than from over the top of his head.  But obviously. It does distort the perspective. 

I Guess, but there were plenty of times when the catcher moved to the inside and the ump was looking over his head and didn’t reposition himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to give props to my namesake; I liked him a lot better than I thought I had remembered him.  Seemed very comfortable, good analysis, and some humorous quips.  I liked the comment about Frazier picking up a piano as he rounded second on his way to third for his triple...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

It curious how the ump sits directly behind the inside corner instead of the middle of the plate.  He’s got a bad view of the outside corner.  He setup there whether the catcher was directly in front of him or not.  Do they all do that?

A few years ago MLB told the umpires to set up this way. It is supposed to keep the umpires from getting hit with foul tips and avoid getting concussions.

Apparently MLB doesn't care about all the lousy calls on the outside of the plate.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

On the other hand, the problem with the ump yesterday was inside/outside, not up/down, for the most part.  I’m expecting a bad report from Ump Scorecard today.  

Mostly left-right misses, but he missed a couple up and down too. 72% called strike accuracy is brutal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

 Along with Palmer and McDonald he's very good overall, and not afraid to call them like he sees them. 

I agree. I got the chance to catch the last several innings of the game and I think Gregg did a good job and he's got the voice for the gig. I think he's the right man for the job if the Orioles need a 3rd Color Commentator. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • WBALs Blair Young likes our chances https://www.wbaltv.com/article/do-orioles-have-chance-sign-free-agent-pitcher-corbin-burnes/62512129
    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...