Jump to content

Competitive Window- 24' roster


justcompete

Recommended Posts

Clearly we have blast off and have opened the competitive window

Thinking about the roster make up one year from now as we build upon the success of this season.

Infield-best depth

Mountcastle/ options in house are ok-Santander/O'hearn/etc-can Mayo or Kjerstad force their way?

Westburg for me at 2nd Base

Henderson at 3rd

Holliday at SS-next August

Ortiz is the back up MIF

I like the idea of a vet infielder and would be ok with Frasier coming back.  Norby for me is depth or a trade chip

Catching

AD

McCann -comes back-buys time to see how Basallo progresses - decision needed by 2025

Outfield-

I think this is a spot to add a free agent/trade

Hays/Mullins/Santander all return

Can a prospect take a spot?  Lots of options but so far no one has knocked the door down-maybe it happens over the next year.

Mayo/Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers/Tavera/Fabian/Haskin- lots of options.  Would love to see a trade or a signing

Pitching

A few aces (maybe) and a lot of mid rotation guys in free agency.

Hall/Povich/Mcdermott -not sure they step up in the next 12 months for the 24' playoff push

2023 season certainly opened our competitive window and the guys are getting battle tested.  However it ends we had great opportunity to evaluate our system.  Now we need to step on the gas pedal to push us to the next level- 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this offseason that we needed two things to go from good to great: one reliable bat and one top pitcher. We didn't get either of those and that's probably what keeps us from winning a championship this season. We need to get it next offseason if we want to win championships. If we just want to be "in it" next year, then our roster is fine for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I said this offseason that we needed two things to go from good to great: one reliable bat and one top pitcher. We didn't get either of those and that's probably what keeps us from winning a championship this season. We need to get it next offseason if we want to win championships. If we just want to be "in it" next year, then our roster is fine for that. 

I can't argue with your opinion here. I agree about the pitching. I can't shake my bias though and I prefer they continue with the position prospects that we have until we see they are not going to work out. I would prefer that they see what they have in Kjerstad, Cowser, Ortiz, Mayo and obviously Holiday. I think they have enough pitching to fill out a good bullpen. The only thing is someone to slot at the top of the rotation. They have a lot of starters but too many question marks. Means. Rodriguez, Bradish, Kremer, Wells, Johnson, Povich, etc. 

Edited by MCO'sFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

I can't argue with your opinion here. I agree about the pitching. I can't shake my bias though and I prefer they continue with the position prospects that we have until we see they are not going to work out. I would prefer that they see what they have in Kjerstad, Cowser, Ortiz, Mayo and obviously Holiday. I think they have enough pitching to fill out a good bullpen. The only thing is someone to slot at the top of the rotation. They have a lot of starters but too many question marks. Means. Rodriguez, Bradish, Kremer, Wells, Johnson, Povich, etc. 

So you don't think GRod and Bradish are a good #1 and #2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/free-agents/

With the exception of Ohtani, the 2024 FA class is a bit thin. There are some interesting players available, however. Snell seems like a guy the O's might go after. How would Bellinger fit at 1B? Does Josh Hater want a reunion? 

We've talked about this ad nauseum at the trade deadline but do they spend money or prospects or both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

So you don't think GRod and Bradish are a good #1 and #2?

At this point in GRod's career he's a better #2 if you can sign someone like Snell. If he matures into a #1 over the short term all the better. He's gone more than 6 innings exactly once in his career. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

I can't argue with your opinion here. I agree about the pitching. I can't shake my bias though and I prefer they continue with the position prospects that we have until we see they are not going to work out. I would prefer that they see what they have in Kjerstad, Cowser, Ortiz, Mayo and obviously Holiday. I think they have enough pitching to fill out a good bullpen. The only thing is someone to slot at the top of the rotation. They have a lot of starters but too many question marks. Means. Rodriguez, Bradish, Kremer, Wells, Johnson, Povich, etc. 

Yes, but if everyone of them require an adjustment time like Gunnar and Adley, it will take a while and neither of those are true mashers either yet. What if all of those guys take a while or just don't live up to the hype? We have a window RIGHT NOW! The window is wide open. We are the second best team in baseball. Spend some money, get two true stars and worry about the rest later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take a look at the pitching market, both free agency and trade. Starters and veteran 7th/8th inning guys. Starter could be another Gibson type. If we mostly stand pat and wait for the trade deadline I would be OK with that.

Biggest offseason priority is extensions for some combination of Gunnar, Holliday, and Adley. Locking up one of those guys would be a successful offseason for me.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Yes, but if everyone of them require an adjustment time like Gunnar and Adley, it will take a while and neither of those are true mashers either yet. What if all of those guys take a while or just don't live up to the hype? We have a window RIGHT NOW! The window is wide open. We are the second best team in baseball. Spend some money, get two true stars and worry about the rest later. 

Third best record as of today.

 

I don't believe that Elias has the budget for any FA additions until proven otherwise.

 

I'm fine with some trades from prospect collateral and some of the vets on the team in order to strengthen some of the weaknesses.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

So you don't think GRod and Bradish are a good #1 and #2?

I would say that I think GrayRod has the potential to be a true ace but certainly isn't there yet. I think Bradish can be a solid 2. I think he's there now. We will have to see if he can continue to perform at what is likely his ceiling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Yes, but if everyone of them require an adjustment time like Gunnar and Adley, it will take a while and neither of those are true mashers either yet. What if all of those guys take a while or just don't live up to the hype? We have a window RIGHT NOW! The window is wide open. We are the second best team in baseball. Spend some money, get two true stars and worry about the rest later. 

Your suggestions are completely valid. I just don't think that's the way I would go and I don't think that is the way the O's go. FA are not sure things either, in fact, there is a decent chance that they never reach a level of value that it would take to sign them. I think that the O's can afford to continue to introduce a few prospects at a time and weather the adjustment periods with the talent already on the team. I do expect them to trade Hays and/or Santander this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, maybenxtyr said:

Third best record as of today.

 

I don't believe that Elias has the budget for any FA additions until proven otherwise.

 

I'm fine with some trades from prospect collateral and some of the vets on the team in order to strengthen some of the weaknesses.

I agree and I certainly don't think he has the budget for the level of FA that it would take to make a difference. So, just let the kids play and see if they develop. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/free-agents/

With the exception of Ohtani, the 2024 FA class is a bit thin. There are some interesting players available, however. Snell seems like a guy the O's might go after. How would Bellinger fit at 1B? Does Josh Hater want a reunion? 

We've talked about this ad nauseum at the trade deadline but do they spend money or prospects or both?

Not a chance we overpay for someone like Snell nor do I want to. Hader will also be too rich for us. I think Flaherty for two or three years and then a big trade including at least one of our top 50 prospects is the far more likely outcome. Also wouldn’t mind another bat for O’Hearn regression insurance. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, joelala said:

Not a chance we overpay for someone like Snell nor do I want to. Hader will also be too rich for us. I think Flaherty for two or three years and then a big trade including at least one of our top 50 prospects is the far more likely outcome. Also wouldn’t mind another bat for O’Hearn regression insurance. 

Definitely not counting on O'Hearn. I can see them trying to bring in a 1B if anything. I'd still like to see an in house option. Something like Santander more often on go all in on moving Mayo to 1B. 

Edited by MCO'sFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...