Jump to content

So have the O’s clinched a playoff spot, or not?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, rm5678 said:

I heard last night that the Rays' magic number last night was 2. Since the Rangers lost, I think it dropped to 1. So if the O's win today and the Rangers lose, does that mean the O's and Rays will both be celebrating after today's game?

I doubt neither team celebrates today, because winning the division is the goal

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

If Toronto won out, they'd be at 95 wins.  The Orioles hold the tie breaker, so with the O's at 92 wins, wouldn't the magic number be 3, not 1?

Apparently it comes down to how many times SEA and TEX play each other. With 7 games between them, one is assured of losing 70. 93 wins would put us ahead of at least one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

If Toronto won out, they'd be at 95 wins.  The Orioles hold the tie breaker, so with the O's at 92 wins, wouldn't the magic number be 3, not 1?

I think our situation has more to do with the Rangers and Mariners having seven games left with each other than Toronto's record. We would only have to beat out one of these three teams to clinch a wild card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

It seems like the O's and Rays will both be celebrating today if Texas loses.

I think the O's and Rays both clinch if either Texas or Seattle lose.  One non-head-to-head loss by either guarantees that one of them must end up with a record worse than 92-70, which is the worst either  Baltimore or Tampa can end up.

Edited by Number5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eddie83 said:

I thought same thing but apparently HOU in a 3 way tie at 92-70 could fall to 3rd place in West but then wins head to head tiebreak over BAL.  

If either Texas or Seattle lose a non-head-to-head game, a 3-way tie with Houston at 92-70 is not possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Number5 said:

I think the O's and Rays both clinch if either Texas or Seattle lose.  One non-head-to-head loss by either guarantees that one of them must end up with a record worse than 92-70, which is the worst either  Baltimore or Tampa can end up.

The Seattle game won't end until the O's are on their flight to Houston, so hopefully it won't come down to that today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Apparently it comes down to how many times SEA and TEX play each other. With 7 games between them, one is assured of losing 70. 93 wins would put us ahead of at least one. 

 

59 minutes ago, hutchead said:

I think our situation has more to do with the Rangers and Mariners having seven games left with each other than Toronto's record. We would only have to beat out one of these three teams to clinch a wild card.

 

TB is a virtual lock with 2 spots open.  Seattle is on the outside looking in behind Toronto.   In the unlikely event Texas takes all 7,  there's still the question of Toronto for the 3rd WC.  

We're close is all that matters.   I want the division title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...