Jump to content

Many Reasons to be Optimistic for the Postseason


psagawa

Recommended Posts

All excellent points except the last. I’m not so sure the national media isn’t on the Orioles at this point. Have heard multiple talking heads state that the Os have a legit shot. Effusive praise on MLBN, Smoltz has had a lot of positive things to say on the couple of recent Fox broadcasts, etc. 

An argument can be made that the Os are set to become the darlings of the league outside of the usual suspect big cities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm feeling pretty zen. For me, the biggest reason for optimism is the organization is set up to compete for a long time. Win or lose, this isn't going to be our only shot. We have a great core of young players and outstanding leadership. (OK, we do need ownership to step up).

As far as this year, it seems like Bradish and Grayson seem like the type of 1A/1B combo that can get hot at the right time and dominate. They have been doing it all second half. Just need to carry it through a bit longer. Those guys could each be good for two wins in a 7 game series.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, psagawa said:

 

3. Likely opponents - The Rays and Jays are the most likely ALDS opponents. We beat both of them decisively this year. We will be at home.

100% home field advantage is only wildcard round.

ALDS I believe is 2-2-1, so for the road team a split is all they need to open up an opportunity to close out on their home field.

Certainly if things go very well, Bradish and Grayson may not pitch on the road for a minute.    The two big guns are in place to protect the OPACY house.

Edited by Just Regular
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing I’m uncertain about with a team with very little postseason experience is how they handle nerves and all the added attention. Some guys continue to do what they did all year, and others seem to put too much pressure on themselves. I remember players like Adam Jones and Wieters whose postseason OPS were each south of .450, SSS notwithstanding (because for most players, SSS is often all you get). But this core had zero expectations, there is no “now or never” pressure, so I hope they go out without a care in the world… and just casually and meticulously knock down every opponent over the next three series.

Edited by InsideCoroner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

I'm feeling pretty zen. For me, the biggest reason for optimism is the organization is set up to compete for a long time. Win or lose, this isn't going to be our only shot. We have a great core of young players and outstanding leadership. (OK, we do need ownership to step up).

As far as this year, it seems like Bradish and Grayson seem like the type of 1A/1B combo that can get hot at the right time and dominate. They have been doing it all second half. Just need to carry it through a bit longer. Those guys could each be good for two wins in a 7 game series.

We all hope they'll be back regularly over the next few years, but you never know about these things. That said, my minimum acceptable outcome is not losing to the Jays or Rays. That would sting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, InsideCoroner said:

The one thing I’m uncertain about with a team with very little postseason experience is how they handle nerves and all the added attention. Some guys continue to do what they did all year, and others seem to put too much pressure on themselves. I remember players like Adam Jones and Wieters whose postseason OPS were each south of .450, SSS notwithstanding (because for most players, SSS is often all you get). But this core had zero expectations, there is no “now or never” pressure, so I hope they go out without a care in the world… and just casually and meticulously knock down every opponent over the next three series.

This situation you note above gives me a 1966 vibe. Too young and too good, to show any fear!

Or for a different dose of optimism, compare '82-'83 Ripken with '23 Henderson, 40 years later. I predict 7 games over PHL for the rematch, with ex-Phil Gibson getting the win in relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, EddeeEddee said:

I will feel better when the offense comes back.  The O's have been a light hitting team lately.

what has happened to Ryan O'Hearn? One our best clutch hitter, he cant even smell a hit right now and he(along with Santander ) is striking out a ton...Luckily, If O' Hearn slumps theres always Mountcastle...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

what has happened to Ryan O'Hearn? One our best clutch hitter, he cant even smell a hit right now and he(along with Santander ) is striking out a ton...Luckily, If O' Hearn slumps theres always Mountcastle...

Mullins too.  Seems like only Adley has been fairly hot lately.  Hopefully Mountcastle's double tonight will get things going for everyone else.  Fingers crossed the several days off they'll get next week will help reenergize things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, EddeeEddee said:

Mullins too.  Seems like only Adley has been fairly hot lately.  Hopefully Mountcastle's double tonight will get things going for everyone else.  Fingers crossed the several days off they'll get next week will help reenergize things.

Mountcastle being back to pick up for O'Hearn if he can't shake his first slump of an amazing season is a big plus.

But I'm worried that the days off can just as well have the opposite effect--I still remember the juggernaut Rockies team of 2007 getting swept after they waited around for the AL championship to be decided. Or last season's 111-51 Dodgers team losing to the over-performing Padres; their final regular season  game was Oct. 5th and they had to wait until Oct. 11th for their  first playoff game. I wonder what lessons LA learned from that.

Edited by LA2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...