Jump to content

Proposal for Postseason changes


eddie83

Recommended Posts

Add another playoff team. That’s right have 7 playoff teams. 6/7 play in a best of one. Winner plays 3 seed. Increases meaning of end of regular season. Teams will want to avoid the one game scenario. This newly created game does add 2 more additional days off before the Division round. 
 

Add a 3 game series for the 4 division winners. One plays one and two plays two in the home park of team with a bettter record. The benefit for the winner is home field advantage in WS. Of course this would only apply if those 2 teams meet in the WS. Even if one team goes up 2-0 the 3rd game will still be played. 
 

End of regular season

1)Off day 

2)6/7 matchups -off day everyone else

3)1-1 and 2-2 series start - off day WC teams

4)1-1, 2-2 Game 2, WC round Game 1

5)1-1, 2-2 Game 3,  WC Game 2

6)WC Game 3 if necessary Off day for division winners 

7)Off day everyone 

Division round starts


 

So the top 2 division champs in each league have 

2 off days 

play 3 games 

2 off days 

The WC teams minus the 6/7 matchup have 

3 off days 

play 2-3 games 

have 1-2 off days 

Doing this increases the meaning of the regular season. Teams will want to avoid the 6/7 play in game. TOR this year some thought may have wanted to be a 6 seed or at least did not care. 
 

It accomplishes one big thing which is eliminates the off days conversation. It will be similar for any team that plays in the Division round. Nobody would confuse playing in a win or go home WC round compared to home field for a series that may not even happen but it’s better than right now. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Sacrilegious, but I want three division winners and one wildcard. Best team with the best record (1) plays the wildcard (4). 2 and 3 play each other. First series is a five game set, the LCS and World Series are obviously 7. 
 

Two off days for everyone after the season. Postseason begins immediately for everyone. 
 

I’m tired of postseason expansion and I get it, it keeps more fans engaged because their team has a chance to make it. I don’t discredit that and I realize what I’d prefer doesn’t allow for that. I also don’t care. 
 

I’m tired of seeing baseball trend towards the NHL where over half the teams in the league make the playoffs. It’s a joke. The NBA is about right there, too.  NFL football is perfect, it can do whatever it does and I’m fine with it. 
 

My point is that as long as they keep expanding things, the answers and scenarios and schedules get more complicated and more annoying. 
 

How did we survive the 70s, 80s and 90s with fewer playoff teams? It’s impossible to comprehend. 
 

Keep the playoffs special. Keep it exclusive. I don’t care if Dwayne in Cincinnati stops watching the Reds in September because they’ve fallen out of the race. 

I get all of that but we aren’t going back to it. 
 

I just want to increase end of year meaning and keep teams on similar schedules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the biggest one in the current format being talked about is no off day between the wild card round and divisional round.  With all wild card games being 2-0 those teams got two days rest and didn't have to dig as deep in to their pitching staffs.

Edited by NedFromYork
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I get all of that but we aren’t going back to it. 
 

I just want to increase end of year meaning and keep teams on similar schedules. 

I think your plan is good…and agree we ain’t going back, but I am in  Moose’s camp. I think you should either have a long season and a short playoffs to find the Crème de La crème. Or have a relatively short season and a long playoffs where you really figure out who is best. I prefer the long season where over months you learn who are the best teams. Then the playoffs are just a fun exhibition of talent plus things like Mateo suddenly deciding to mash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go back to two WC teams in a 1 game playoff a day after the regular season ends.  Divisional round starts the next day.  No days off during the divisional round.  Five in a row if needed.  I thought that last year as well. There is no need for all the off days during the post season.  It just helps weaker teams with no depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

I believe the division round should be 7 games and WC round 1 game. This will prevent the long layoff. I say that knowing there is a possibility we are a WC team next year.

I like this idea. It makes it less of a disadvantage for the top teams. The teams who grinding out to the best records of a 162 game season will get maybe 2 days off and still be in their rhythm and keeping their timing, while also having 7 games to prove they were the best in case something happens in the 2 or 3 days rest when their timing got out of whack. It allows MLB to put on the same number of games and sell just about the same number of tickets and sponsorships as a 3 game WC and 5 game DS.  Probably more if the markets are big (which they usually are for the best teams). And it also gives the same number of teams and opportunity to keep playing, but shortens it to just 1 game. The 1 game wildcard also provides a rewarded advantage to the Division winners/best records in baseball, because the wildcard teams wouldn't get any days of rest if games start right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is all about additional TV money.  Instead of two wild card games MLB can sell 8-12.  Any “fixes” to make it “more fair” will likely involve expansion to 8 teams in each league.  I would imagine that will happen after MLB adds two more teams and goes to eight four-team divisions.

The one thing I would like MLB to figure out is more fair seeding.  The #2 seed was locked into playing one of the teams with the 5th and 6th best records while the #1 seed was locked into playing one of the teams with the 2nd or 3rd best records in a best-of-five.  Seems like everyone wants to try to emulate March Madness with a fixed bracket.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in 3-5 years they'll expand to 16 teams in each league. In that case, it'd make a lot of sense to have two 8-team East/West divisions, keep the current format, and the two byes are the two division winners. The next four best teams play in the wild card series. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...