Jump to content

Cease vs everyone else


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Someone spending a billion plus for the team isn't going to care about a bit of extra payroll.

Someone who has a billion plus to spend didn’t get it by spending frivolously.  They will analyze all assets and future contracts.  To think otherwise is foolish.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

It’s real slow tonight ….but not be worth the week wait

 

I actually think your proposal on their board of Ortiz, Mountcastle and Santander for Woo is interesting but I’d leave that garbage simulator out of the conversation 😉

I also love that their thread has gotten to the point where Os fans are coming to talk about deals with the Mariners. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Someone who has a billion plus to spend didn’t get it by spending frivolously.  They will analyze all assets and future contracts.  To think otherwise is foolish.  

 

Yea they will analyze it, and it will be negligible amount that won't have any impact on a deal being struck.

The Royals sold for a billion in 2019.  Even without MASN the O's would go for more.

You think an additional 50M in obligations spread over 3 years is going to matter?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

Yea they will analyze it, and it will be negligible amount that won't have any impact on a deal being struck.

The Royals sold for a billion in 2019.  Even without MASN the O's would go for more.

You think an additional 50M in obligations spread over 3 years is going to matter?

 

I think not having 50MM spread over 3 years and having the ability to choose how you’d like to spend 50MM over 3 years  is more appealing.  
 

You don’t?  

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I think not having 50MM spread over 3 years and having the ability to choose how you’d like to spend 50MM over 3 years  is more appealing.  
 

You don’t?  

If that 50M is being spent on Chris Davis yes.

If that money went to a player that was helping the team, very possibly not.

No one is going to back out of billion plus deal over 3/50.

If the O's signed Adley or Gunnar to a long term deal might that not make the team more enticing to a buyer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If that 50M is being spent on Chris Davis yes.

If that money went to a player that was helping the team, very possibly not.

No one is going to back out of billion plus deal over 3/50.

If the O's signed Adley or Gunnar to a long term deal might that not make the team more enticing to a buyer?

I think you could come up with some scenarios where it might be more enticing, sure.  
 

I didn’t say anything about anyone backing out of any deals.  I said a lower payroll would be appealing and that someone with a billion to spend is going to analyze all details meticulously.  
 

Apparently the Latrell Spreewell fan club got offended 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I think you could come up with some scenarios where it might be more enticing, sure.  
 

I didn’t say anything about anyone backing out of any deals.  I said a lower payroll would be appealing and that someone with a billion to spend is going to analyze all details meticulously.  
 

Apparently the Latrell Spreewell fan club got offended 🤷‍♂️

I didn't get offended.

I just think it's a very poor take to think that additional payroll is in any way going to materially impact the sale of the team.

It's like you want to buy a super rare car, one of 30 in existence, sure to appreciate in value.

Only one of them is for sale at a time and years go by before one is put on the market.

Are you not going to buy your dream car because the seat needs to be reupholstered?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I didn't get offended.

I just think it's a very poor take to think that additional payroll is in any way going to materially impact the sale of the team.

It's like you want to buy a super rare car, one of 30 in existence, sure to appreciate in value.

Only one of them is for sale at a time and years go by before one is put on the market.

Are you not going to buy your dream car because the seat needs to be reupholstered?

It's actually more like you're not going to buy your dream car because the previous owner has negotiated a contract to have the seats reupholstered a cushion at a time over the next ten years at 10 million a cushion, and has negotiated the work by placing a lien against the vehicle that transfers with the car.

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, owknows said:

It's actually more like you're not going to buy your dream car because the previous owner has negotiated a contract to have the seats reupholstered a cushion at a time over the next ten years at 10 million a cushion, and has negotiated the work by placing a lien against the vehicle that transfers with the car.

 

No, you obviously didn't understand the point.

For your version to work the team would have to have billions in contracts.

No one is advocating that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

No, you obviously didn't understand the point.

For your version to work the team would have to have billions in contracts.

No one is advocating that.

was just going for the laugh bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Just an FYI one of the WS board insiders seems to think the Yankees are making an aggressive push. @Chicago White Sox can probably best speak to their credibility as an insider.

Highly credible.  He has broken multiple things and has real connections.  I’d say it’s reasonable to assume some smoke there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Highly credible.  He has broken multiple things and has real connections.  I’d say it’s reasonable to assume some smoke there.

I will say, it seems like there’s a hell of a lot of leaking from the WS. There’s what, 5+ insiders on your board that have dropped real scoops over time? And Morosi seems like he might as well just be reading press releases directly from Getz sometimes. I don’t know if it’s beneficial or not for the WS but it couldn’t be more different than what we’ve seen for the past five years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...