Jump to content

Breaking down Holliday’s swing


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

So, all hitting coaches would teach this and I would assume most  ML hitters do this.

Yea, but some don’t do it well.  One of the main reasons why baseball players have to be limber/pliable.  You won’t see it much in the “beef cakes”.  Griffey was probably the best ever.  Just one of the reasons why people are so high on him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An example of someone who doesn’t do “the stretch” move very well is our very own Mateo.  He is very “handsy” with his swing.  His hands go too early, doesn’t stretch, kinetic chain breaks down, and as a result his bat doesn’t stay in the hitting zone very long.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2024 at 12:48 PM, emmett16 said:

An example of someone who doesn’t do “the stretch” move very well is our very own Mateo.  He is very “handsy” with his swing.  His hands go too early, doesn’t stretch, kinetic chain breaks down, and as a result his bat doesn’t stay in the hitting zone very long.  

You sound like you know a lot about the technical aspects of hitting and probably a lot more than me.  However, I’d say Mateo’s main problem is his front side leaking out too soon.  In April last year his bat stayed in the zone long and he showed really good power and stayed on breaking pitches as well as laying off chase pitches away.   That might have left him in danger of inner half heat eventually but he’s never going to be a great hitter.   For whatever reason, May came and the front side went and along with it, his power/bat speed, plate coverage, and ability to lay off the chase pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You sound like you know a lot about the technical aspects of hitting and probably a lot more than me.  However, I’d say Mateo’s main problem is his front side leaking out too soon.  In April last year his bat stayed in the zone long and he showed really good power and stayed on breaking pitches as well as laying off chase pitches away.   That might have left him in danger of inner half heat eventually but he’s never going to be a great hitter.   For whatever reason, May came and the front side went and along with it, his power/bat speed, plate coverage, and ability to lay off the chase pitches.

This is why you preach working away.  When hitters are going well, their approach is to drive the ball into the opposite power gap; ex. when Mountcastle is hot he gets a lot of hits to right center.  Guys slumping often look pull happy.  The barrel needs to stay in the zone as long as possible to be most effective, especially against the huge speed variations and massive movement MLB pitchers generate. 

Jackson doesn't step in the bucket.  The swing is beautiful.  If I'm picking a nit, I do see a bit more forward head movement than I'd teach but he's going to be a total stud.

Jackson's head position:  

 

Freeman's head position: 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ripken said:

This is why you preach working away.  When hitters are going well, their approach is to drive the ball into the opposite power gap; ex. when Mountcastle is hot he gets a lot of hits to right center.  Guys slumping often look pull happy.  The barrel needs to stay in the zone as long as possible to be most effective, especially against the huge speed variations and massive movement MLB pitchers generate. 

Jackson doesn't step in the bucket.  The swing is beautiful.  If I'm picking a nit, I do see a bit more forward head movement than I'd teach but he's going to be a total stud.

Jackson's head position:  

 

Freeman's head position: 

 

I guess it depends on your definition of “step in the bucket”.  His stride foot definitely doesn’t go straight.  Pretty easy to see where his foot is in relation to the batters box and how much further away it is when it lands.  It doesn’t seem to affect him negatively though.  Interestingly enough, Freeman’s stride foot goes perfectly straight.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You sound like you know a lot about the technical aspects of hitting and probably a lot more than me.  However, I’d say Mateo’s main problem is his front side leaking out too soon.  In April last year his bat stayed in the zone long and he showed really good power and stayed on breaking pitches as well as laying off chase pitches away.   That might have left him in danger of inner half heat eventually but he’s never going to be a great hitter.   For whatever reason, May came and the front side went and along with it, his power/bat speed, plate coverage, and ability to lay off the chase pitches.

The two things are related (the stretch move & leaking out).  When you say leaking out you are talking about the front shoulder, not feet/hips.   If your front shoulder leaks out, it pulls the hands with it.  When you do that your bat gets into the hitting zone later and leaves the hitting zone earlier, there’s nowhere else for the bat to go.  When you stretch (look at Holliday front shoulder location and the jersey stretching as he gets separation) and front shoulder stays solid longer, the bat enters the zone earlier and as the kinetic chain uncoils the bat stays in the zone (going towards the pitcher) longer.  Front shoulder will actually go up as hips and bottom half clears more so than twisting open.  Mateos front shoulder and hip open almost simultaneously pulling with it the hands/bat.  He has no room for error, the bat doesnt stay in the hitting zone very long. 
 

https://www.mlb.com/video/a-deep-dive-into-jorge-mateo-s-home-run
 


The above is a good visual of Mateo’s swing .  If we could see Hollidays(we should be able to this year) you’d see the bat staying on that line to the pitcher longer.  You can only do that if front shoulder/side doesn’t leak.  Mind you, the above was when he was going well.  We are talking about inches and fractions of an inch here.  “Distance in the zone” avg. for majors is ~32” (that’s how long bat is effectively on the hitting zone).  I imagine Mateo is right around there or slightly below.  I bet Holliday is 36”+.  Distance in zone info comes from Diamond kinetics.  

Edited by emmett16
  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I guess it depends on your definition of “step in the bucket”.  His stride foot definitely doesn’t go straight.  Pretty easy to see where his foot is in relation to the batters box and how much further away it is when it lands.  It doesn’t seem to affect him negatively though.  Interestingly enough, Freeman’s stride foot goes perfectly straight.

Everyone’s body works completely differently, that’s the down side of a one prescription approach to hitting.  You first have to figure out your motor preference before you can build an efficient swing for your body typ.  An aerial mover’s body will work complete different than a terrestrial mover.  Neither of their swings/mechanics are “wrong” they are simply doing the movement profile that is most efficient for their body type. 

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ripken said:

This is why you preach working away.  When hitters are going well, their approach is to drive the ball into the opposite power gap; ex. when Mountcastle is hot he gets a lot of hits to right center.  Guys slumping often look pull happy.  The barrel needs to stay in the zone as long as possible to be most effective, especially against the huge speed variations and massive movement MLB pitchers generate. 

Jackson doesn't step in the bucket.  The swing is beautiful.  If I'm picking a nit, I do see a bit more forward head movement than I'd teach but he's going to be a total stud.

Jackson's head position:  

 

Freeman's head position: 

 

That’s correct and the whole “go away” is really just an over adjustment cue to keep the front side (shoulder) closed longer.  Again, it’s really all just about keeping the bat on the zone longer with maximum bat speed. Hitting a ball is friggin hard so you have to give yourself as much of a chance as possible.  It’s just playing the percentages….if your bat is in the zone for 30” vs. 38” who do you think is gonna hit a 100mph fastball more often.  The guy with a 30” distance in zone with 20/10 vision is going to fail more often than the guy with normal vision who keeps the bat in the zone 38”.  The over adjustment/approach of going the other way will help you keep your front side closed longer, which creates a longer distance in zone, which results in more contact.  Those times Mounty had that approach he also hit some monster HRs those were a result of staying closed and stretching his “power coil” to the max.  More stretch you get = more bat speed.  Every 1mph in increased bat speed is ~1.5mph in EV. So as crazy as it sounds the “go away” approach will also increase your EVs & wOBACON. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C2AlH5zOOLX/?igsh=MTc2NHNoeTdsa2UwNQ==
 

Underload reps (game bat -20%) vs. high velo.  

Guys work overload/underload training to increase bat speed & bat path.  
 

Overload is a bat 20% more than game bat, weight can be at barrel or on hands depending on what you’re workin on.  
 

Underload is bat 20% less than game bat.  Sometimes a short bat to increase challenge. 
 

He’s hitting “smash balls”.  They fly like baseballs but have to be squared up or they don’t fly.  They save your bats (and hands) when hitting vs. velocity in practice.   
 

Love the dude ribbing him on the rollover on 100mph from 50’ lol

Edited by emmett16
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Aram Leighton from Just Baseball on Holliday

“He has the tendency to pull off of the ball a bit with his front side, which can minimize his ability to use the ground and his lower half to generate more power, especially on pitches on the outer half. The move does not impede his ability to consistently make contact thanks to his adjustability and feel for the barrel. Holliday projects as an easy plus hitter with more juice to tap into.“

https://www.justbaseball.com/prospects/baltimore-orioles-top-15-prospects-for-2024/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Must see video.  On some of these highlights there’s a leg lift but it doesn’t seem as pronounced as it is now.  On many it’s more of a toe tap and hardly any foot/leg movement at all.  Interesting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I plan on bumping this thread about 1x per week to track how Holliday is progressing back in AAA.

Hopefully he will impress quickly and force his way back up here.

In his last week at AAA (6 games)  he hit .227 / .433 / .364.       No homers, 8 BB : 8 K.

Glad to see the BB:K ratio is getting back to where we expect it to be for him.  Guess that's progress.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...