Jump to content

Selected ZiPS WAR projections, 2024-26


Frobby

Recommended Posts

The player pages on Fsngraphs now have ZiPS projections for each of the next three years, and I thought I’d just post a few of our younger players here:

Rutschman 5.2, 5.0, 5.0

Henderson 4.8, 4.7, 4.8

Holliday 2.9, 3.1, 3.4

Westburg 2.8, 2.7, 2.6

Mayo 2.3, 2.4, 3.2

Kjerstad 1.5, 1.3, 1.0

Cowser 1.7, 1.6, 1.7

For 2024, these all assume a full year in the big leagues, which obviously may not be the case for some of these guys.

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The player pages on Fsngraphs now have ZiPS projections for each of the next three years, and I thought I’d just post a few of our younger players here:

Rutschman 5.2, 5.0, 5.0

Henderson 4.8, 4.7, 4.8

Holliday 2.9, 3.1, 3.4

Westburg 2.8, 2.7, 2.6

Mayo 2.3, 2.4, 3.2

Kjerstad 1.5, 1.3, 1.0

Cowser 1.7, 1.6, 1.7

For 2024, these all assume a full year in the big leagues, which obviously may not be the case for some of these guys.

 

Thanks for this.  You know, I'll occasionally look at WAR and think that Player A, who has a higher WAR than Player B, means Player A, by that one metric at least, is the better player.  And then I recall it is position-based.  Therefore, Rutschman with a 5.2 WAR at catcher is not necessarily a better player than than a 4.8 WAR Gunnar at SS.   However, I'd be interested to know whether there is a WAR-based metric that factors in the differences in positions.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/5/2024 at 1:56 PM, Billy F-Face3 said:

Interesting to see how high Westburg is listed there. They have him basically on parr with the #1 prospect in baseball.

Well, he is like 5 years older.  Also, those projections for Holliday are pretty pedestrian. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the fun of Jackson Holliday is just watching the tools like ZiPS not exactly know what to do with him.

I'd posted that James Holzhauer gambling story the other day where he celebrated his Ryan Howard to lead MLB in HR prop bet win, and suggested undervalued longshots as a profit center to mine.     It isn't an entertainment I partake of, but in that spirit I feel like a Prop for "Jackson Holliday to win 2024 AL Batting Title" could return value.

Fangraphs Depth Charts only forecast Yordan, Yoshida, Seager and Bichette to hit .290 in the 2024 AL.     It doesn't feel impossible that Holliday will arrive fully formed, lace his singles even off of Griffin Canning and Michael Wacha, and hit .306 or something.

Or sharpen his skills with that wicked Norfolk live batting practice, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DT's include six-year mean projections, and here's an assortment of 2024-2029 readouts (6-year WAR total beginning with 2024) on the players upcoming AL championships will go through:

35-40 WAR: Soto, Julio, Yordan, Judge, Adley

25-32 WAR: Seager, Tucker, Bichette, Gunnar, Volpe, Holliday, Carter, Vlad

18-21 WAR: Paredes, Bregman, Altuve, Basallo, Semien, Mayo

14-16 WAR: Caminero, Cowser, Mullins, Jung, Arozarena

Others surveyed: Westburg 13, Langford 11, Kjerstad 6.    The DT's still like Cowser and are out on the older, hackier Kjerstad.    I think that Langford is too low, but his pro track record is small.

Soto, Vlad, Bo - should you stay, or should you go?   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/5/2024 at 1:58 PM, clapdiddy said:

I definitely expect more WAR from Henderson and Holliday...and maybe not as much from Adley.  

I think there’s a very good chance that Adley has another gear we haven’t seen yet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/5/2024 at 1:56 PM, Billy F-Face3 said:

Interesting to see how high Westburg is listed there. They have him basically on parr with the #1 prospect in baseball.

I've said this before but there are many teams in baseball where Westburg would be the most exciting young player on the team. And he's an afterthought here. Not that people think badly of him, it's just Adley, Gunnar, and Holliday are objectively more exciting.

It really speaks to the job Mike and co have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/5/2024 at 2:21 PM, Greg Pappas said:

Thanks for this.  You know, I'll occasionally look at WAR and think that Player A, who has a higher WAR than Player B, means Player A, by that one metric at least, is the better player.  And then I recall it is position-based.  Therefore, Rutschman with a 5.2 WAR at catcher is not necessarily a better player than than a 4.8 WAR Gunnar at SS.   However, I'd be interested to know whether there is a WAR-based metric that factors in the differences in positions.  

That is what WAR inherently attempts to do with positional adjustments embedded into the composite metric

Edited by Say O!
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...