Jump to content

4/12 vs. Brewers: Holiday’s Home Debut


ArtVanDelay

Recommended Posts

One of the nice things about a 162 season is that you can be terrible 20 or 30 times and still win 100 games.

However, all season long we’ve been playing guys who made mistakes, and we capitalized on those mistakes. This is what is going to happen if we don’t start hitting better, because some teams won’t make mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am interested in the Micheal Douglas Franklin show.  Hopefully they show him being extra friendly with the French ladies.   And they should not leave out his Grand Master Mason stuff either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Malike said:

Heasley is the only bullpen arm used today and our relievers have pitched less innings than almost any team in the league.

I have no problem with Hyde using Heasley to eat innings. The question is why is he on the roster when we have better options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Three Run Homer said:

Mayo up to play 3B, Westburg shifts to 2B, Holliday back to Norfolk.  

🤷‍♂️ Last week everyone wanted all of them up, Holliday gets here, doesn't get a hit in 10 ABs now another? You don't think they'll all need to adjust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

Milwaukee beat us 2 of 3 last year, the 2nd being 10-2. So, we can still win 101 games after this loss.

Oh yeah, I remember that game. Dean Kremer got rocked. Now to check tomorrow's starters...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Great. We must have a failure to communicate.  Three times I asked a “yes” or “no” question the other day.   You still haven’t answered.

1. Pop up.  Infielder goes back into the outfield and calls for the ball.   The outfielder is running in for the ball, sees the infielder call for the ball AND is not sure he can get there.  Should the outfielder call off the infielder?   It’s a simple question with a simple answer.   You keep bringing up different things without answering the question.     Go check the other thread.  I asked it three separate times.  No DIRECT answer to that question.

The OF should assume at all times the IF will not make the play and put himself in a position to make the play.  Once the OF realizes the IF will not make the play the OF should call off the IF.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

I am interested in the Micheal Douglas Franklin show.  Hopefully they show him being extra friendly with the French ladies.   And they should not leave out his Grand Master Mason stuff either.

I can't help but think Fatal Attraction when I see his name. I hope Franklin has better luck with his rabbit and his stove. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • WBALs Blair Young likes our chances https://www.wbaltv.com/article/do-orioles-have-chance-sign-free-agent-pitcher-corbin-burnes/62512129
    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...