Jump to content

No one asked me, but he's some of my ideas for strengthening the bullpen and another idea or two.


Recommended Posts

First thing I'd do(if it hasn't already been done) is put Kimbrel on a 15 day IL. I'd move Suarez into the pen. They'll activate Bradish and maybe Means and DFA Ramirez. But if/when Perez returns I'd DFA McKenna , bring up Wells and put him and maybe Suarez into a dual closer responsibility. Both pitchers throw strikes and though Wells does give up HR's , he is a better option to close and did briefly last year.I think Suarez's velocity and pretty good control gives us another option. I'd also try and trade Urias, maybe Hays, and someone like Stowers for a decent pitcher...that may not happen for a while, but I see it in their plans. Also, Cowser needs to make some adjustments on off speed change ups the book on him is out.......he's really striking out too much, and has for 2 weeks. I still think he's got plenty of upside but he must adjust the leagues adjustment on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

First thing I'd do(if it hasn't already been done) is put Kimbrel on a 15 day IL. I'd move Suarez into the pen. They'll activate Bradish and maybe Means and DFA Ramirez. But if/when Perez returns I'd DFA McKenna , bring up Wells and put him and maybe Suarez into a dual closer responsibility. Both pitchers throw strikes and though Wells does give up HR's , he is a better option to close and did briefly last year.I think Suarez's velocity and pretty good control gives us another option. I'd also try and trade Urias, maybe Hays, and someone like Stowers for a decent pitcher...that may not happen for a while, but I see it in their plans. Also, Cowser needs to make some adjustments on off speed change ups the book on him is out.......he's really striking out too much, and has for 2 weeks. I still think he's got plenty of upside but he must adjust the leagues adjustment on him.

I was with up until the rift into an alternate reality when you said trade Urias, Stowers, and Hays for a decent pitcher. The collective value on those 3 probably couldn't bring back a nice coffee maker. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChuckS said:

Is Kimbrel hurt? Velocity way down?

Never knew the IL was an option to stash a player after a couple bad outings. 

They said he was being evaluated for tightness in his back. Is he hurt? Possibly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Is Kimbrel hurt? Velocity way down?

Never knew the IL was an option to stash a player after a couple bad outings. 

His velocity was fine. His location was awful, and I don't think he threw anything but fastballs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Is Kimbrel hurt? Velocity way down?

Never knew the IL was an option to stash a player after a couple bad outings. 

Whenever you see the trainer come out next to Hyde to remove a pitcher like he did today, you can assume they think he’s hurt (whether Kimbrel will admit it or not). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Let’s trade multiple guys with no value for someone who has value!”

Sadly, it doesn’t work like that, and 29 other teams know of our roster crunch and will wait patiently for the DFA axe to fall. Hays, Stowers and Urias do have value, but not much, and won’t bring back anything.

Dump Ramirez, Baumann, and Webb. They will all be claimed by the Rockies or White Sox, and welcome to them.

Bring up Povich, move Suarez to the pen. Activate Bradish to replace Suarez, Activate Means to initially go to the pen, eventually trade places with Irvin.

When wells comes back, another decision will be necessary.

Vespi is doing very well, he should have been here instead of Heasley, but we need to make room for him. why the *&#@ is Ramirez here?

I mean seriously…why?

Anyway, that solves the pitching problem. Eliminate “closer” designation, and throw the best guy available at the last inning.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, InsideCoroner said:

Whenever you see the trainer come out next to Hyde to remove a pitcher like he did today, you can assume they think he’s hurt (whether Kimbrel will admit it or not). 

Pride cometh before a fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

I was with up until the rift into an alternate reality when you said trade Urias, Stowers, and Hays for a decent pitcher. The collective value on those 3 probably couldn't bring back a nice coffee maker. 

Come on leave Roy alone. He does get sideways but never off the rails. Hes definitely an Orioles  fan for Sure. Not that this means anything, but he is the only poster here other than myself that I can recall Referencing The Old Miami Stadium.For all the posters that like to  reminiscent, Believe me that  Stadium has relevance in Oriole lore. Roy has been there, So have I, Have You? Do you even know the Stadium?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Safelykept said:

Come on leave Roy alone. He does get sideways but never off the rails. Hes definitely an Orioles  fan for Sure. Not that this means anything, but he is the only poster here other than myself that I can recall Referencing The Old Miami Stadium.For all the posters that like to  reminiscent, Believe me that  Stadium has relevance in Oriole lore. Roy has been there, So have I, Have You? Do you even know the Stadium?

I was batboy for several seasons in that stadium...and I dont mind people mocking me...its fun...ive been mocked plenty in my career...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see that the idea about Suarez being tried out as a closer or high leverage reliever I've been posting about this week is building momentum. This is good. Send a Suarez for Closer missionary to the Orioles front office and let's make even more converts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...