Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

I think the Tigers would be very wise to sell high. IMO holding him for another season lowers his value because it only lessens his time until FA AND it increases the possibility of him being hurt between now and then. And then they get nothing. 

IMO either way, they are not built set up to win a World Series with him (in the 2 1/2 seasons that they have left on his contract). They don't have nearly enough offense and their best position player prospects are in A ball.

Now on to your Elias point, I agree that he has been very patient and slow moving. But I think the time has come where the stakes are much higher and he is going to have to be much more decisive. There is now an opportunity cost to doing nothing/very little/hedging.

Based on your logic, the Tigers just start process of selling Skubal to rebuild their farm system. But their ownership & FO might have their timelines , the deadline ?  The offseason ?   We will see how it unfold .  As for Elias’s deadline decisions, I would like think he would be more active and bold than last deadline . Again we will see how it would unfolds 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN pregame Buster Olney reported Red Sox giving clubs the vibe they are "undecided".

SP also reported as their #1 need if they buy.   

I do believe the 2024 Red Sox "weren't meant" to be this good, and I'm curious to see the line they take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

ESPN pregame Buster Olney reported Red Sox giving clubs the vibe they are "undecided".

SP also reported as their #1 need if they buy.   

I do believe the 2024 Red Sox "weren't meant" to be this good, and I'm curious to see the line they take.

That would be funny if they tank their own chances.

Kenley Jansen anyone? 🤔

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Really …. I remember guys on your board bashing Ortiz, calling him old, and even changed his first name in a few posts. Although I can’t remember what they were calling him. Saying he wasn’t a good fit for the White Sox. 

Nicky Ortiz, referencing Nicky Lopez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

Does Kimbrel's recent run reduce our need to trade for a closer?  Clearly we need help in the bullpen, but perhaps a couple of trustworthy setup men (one lefty, one righty) would suffice.  

High leverage relievers are the same whether closer or set up in my book, so no.

The choice is on the manager which one closes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

When do you think Elias makes a move? Sooner or closer to the deadline?

He was on the Norfolk broadcast during last week and said obviously we want pitching but it takes two to make a deal. Not a lot of sellers out there right now. Last year we picked up Flaherty on deadline day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

He was on the Norfolk broadcast during last week and said obviously we want pitching but it takes two to make a deal. Not a lot of sellers out there right now. Last year we picked up Flaherty on deadline day. 

Yea but they struck early with Fuji!

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

High leverage relievers are the same whether closer or set up in my book, so no.

The choice is on the manager which one closes.

Leclerc from Texas was their main reliever last year in the playoffs and didn’t close. 

We could just repeat Texas’ recipe and get Chapman and Leclerc. Both rentals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

High leverage relievers are the same whether closer or set up in my book, so no.

The choice is on the manager which one closes.

True but puts a dent in having to find multiple relievers, they do need another good especially if Danny cant get back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Leclerc from Texas was their main reliever last year in the playoffs and didn’t close. 

We could just repeat Texas’ recipe and get Chapman and Leclerc. Both rentals. 

I don't want Chapman and Leclerc has 5.4 BB/9 this season.

But some version of that, sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Safelykept said:

True but puts a dent in having to find multiple relievers, they do need another good especially if Danny cant get back.

It opens up more choices.  They can look at both closers and non-closers.  It will depend on contract and trade price on a case-by-case basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 25 Nuggets said:

It opens up more choices.  They can look at both closers and non-closers.  It will depend on contract and trade price on a case-by-case basis.

I’ve mentioned Cleavinger and Kelly, from Tampa who are both 30 something guys that could be on the move as the Rays are selling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Well, he can talk to Mandrews for some tips.
    • I just logged in and was thinking about Miller as a starter for next season, and whether he would make as much sense as Skubal does... and here you've starting a thread about the same thing.  LOL It's hard to say what it would take to get Miller, but having him an additional five seasons would be incredible.  I'd think the packages would be somewhat similar in value, but that's just a guess.
    • That’s actually really exciting cherry on top for this draft. I believe you can give 125K before it counts towards your pool.
    • Point taken, maybe on value w/r/t the draft. But Johnson isn’t in the same stratosphere as Holiday with what he has done so far in pro ball.
    • Most interesting player behind Honeycutt to me. The first 5 picks will be very interesting to see how much they are able to save. 
    • Just some observations and reflections on this year's draft and the strategy in general... In one thread I defended the emphasis on position players in high rounds, disparaging pitchers as "cannon fodder." Seeing all the pitchers taken in the lower rounds amplifies this take. To expand the analogy to a military "draft," to me this year's draft class especially looks like staffing the officers corps from the best recruits, the higher rounds. Then fill out the ranks of cannon fodder (perishable pitchers) in quantity from the lower rounds.  A post by Frobby in a thread on closers amplifies this point. How many top closers are effective for more than a few years? Same with top starting pitchers. Contrast the longer careers at the top of their game for position players. At the other end of the scale, look how many bullpens are revolving doors of low draft picks, waiver claims, reclamation projects. Sorry for not substantiating all this with researched stats: it's an impression, over many years.  Zoom in to what it's like to throw an unproven reliever out there. He might be lights out, for a few innings, a few outings or a season or two. Great! Rinse and repeat. Hello, Albert Suarez. Goodbye, Fuji. A hitter (and fielder) needs many more repetitions to get a good read on their ability (see: Jim Traber, Jackson Holliday).  So to me this year's draft is an optimum strategy overall (even tho they claim every pick is BPA). Take your few surer things first, the position guys to rely on. Then have lots of "maybe" arms in reserve, because you'll need them, to burn quantity and see what wants to stick when the time comes.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...