Jump to content

Orioles Announcers calling the team Baltimore


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, btownoriole said:

I've noticed it with Hollander but, given some of the history of the franchise shying away from its city identity, I like it. 

I noticed Ben Wagner said it a few times during the Rays series, but since he's new to the O's, it didn't bother me too much. Thankfully, I don't remember ever hearing Kevin Brown or Ben McDonald say it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

I noticed Ben Wagner said it a few times during the Rays series, but since he's new to the O's, it didn't bother me too much. Thankfully, I don't remember ever hearing Kevin Brown or Ben McDonald say it.

I’ve heard KB say it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Surhoffan17 said:

You are not alone on this! I find it strange and have mostly heard it from Hollander. I thought maybe it was some weird directive. But then it wouldn't mostly be him if that were the case. It would be all announcers. 

I have heard DC fans call the Redskins (before the name change) "Washington" even though it was their team, but obviously that was politically driven. No controversy with the Orioles name to my knowledge!

I think a good portion of the affinity for "Washington Redskins" can be attributed to Frank Herzog whose famous line was "Touchdown Washington Redskins".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SemperFi said:

I think a good portion of the affinity for "Washington Redskins" can be attributed to Frank Herzog whose famous line was "Touchdown Washington Redskins".  

In this case, it was just "Washington" being said. No Redskins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the announcers ever refer to the team as “The Baltimores”? I kind of like it when a guy refers to “The Seattles” or “The Bostons” and “New Yorkers” is commonplace, of course.

I think the team should embrace Baltimore. Hopefully Rubenstein can have a beneficial effect on improving the city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Surhoffan17 said:

In this case, it was just "Washington" being said. No Redskins. 

Well, Washington was literally the team name for a short while. And it was light-years better than what they came up with to replace it... but ya know, we're Americans so we need to have corny mascots that we can high five and take pictures with. Obviously I've no issues with 'Orioles', it's iconic and has a deep historical and ecological tie to the city/state. I just wish that some sports teams here in the US, when given the opportunity, would embrace the more city-centric identities that football/soccer clubs in Europe take. That said, I'd also not like for all team-related branding on the jersey to be replaced with sponsor ads as is standard practice in soccer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

So the announcers ever refer to the team as “The Baltimores”? I kind of like it when a guy refers to “The Seattles” or “The Bostons” and “New Yorkers” is commonplace, of course.

I think the team should embrace Baltimore. Hopefully Rubenstein can have a beneficial effect on improving the city.

Way back in time teams didn't have official nicknames. Sometimes they picked them up, like the National League Chicagos were called the Colts, probably because of a stable of young players signed by Cap Anson. The papers were as likely to call teams the Bostons or the Baltimores as anything else. Or if there was more than one team/league in the area they might be called the Washington Nationals, since they were the NL team in Washington.

If you looked into the official legal documentation for the franchise it would just say something like the Cincinnati National League Baseball Club.

It was well into the 20th century before teams started making nicknames official, legal things. As late as the 1930s the Braves started calling themselves the Bees for some reason, and then switched back to Braves.

So I would kind of like it if people occasionally referred to them as the Baltimores or the Baltimore Nine or the Baltimore Americans just as a throwback reference to long ago eras.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, CallMeBrooksie said:

Well, Washington was literally the team name for a short while. And it was light-years better than what they came up with to replace it... but ya know, we're Americans so we need to have corny mascots that we can high five and take pictures with. Obviously I've no issues with 'Orioles', it's iconic and has a deep historical and ecological tie to the city/state. I just wish that some sports teams here in the US, when given the opportunity, would embrace the more city-centric identities that football/soccer clubs in Europe take. That said, I'd also not like for all team-related branding on the jersey to be replaced with sponsor ads as is standard practice in soccer.

Almost all soccer teams have their crest and colors on the jersey, but it's sometimes less obvious than the corporate logos.

Sometimes lower division teams have multiple corporate sponsors with ads on not only the jersey but also shorts and socks. But I don't mind, because that may be the difference between them staying afloat financially and not.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind it, but it is odd.  The O's or Orioles is our familiar nomenclature.  Baltimore is more formal and we're not formal. lol

I wonder if it's because it's being fed to MLB Network  or Sirius or something as a general call of the game - not like the team channel only.  Announcers in those situations tend to distribute the city names and club names pretty evenly throughout a broadcast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, I think Chuck Thompson would at least occasionally refer to the team as Baltimore.  It’s been a long time since he was in the booth, so I can’t say that with 100% certainty, but I’m pretty sure I recall that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I saw Seitzer charge the mound at a game at Memorial Stadium in ‘89 or ‘90. No thanks. 
    • ???. Cowser took more swings against LF than any other LH hitter on the team ( not named  Henderson). He was one of the guys they did not platoon.
    • I think Kevin Seiyltzer was the fall guy for a team that thought they were a championship team.  This guy has overseen more a decade of hitting in Atlanta, has been through developing and helping young batters succeed when the league adjusts.  Most importantly, he has a ring! 
    • Glad one poseur AL team is out.  I hope CLE wins and knocks the other one out tomorrow. 
    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...