Jump to content

Roch Article-Wieters


Ripken23

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 214
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Let's hope Weiters can be more than Jason Varitek. Varitek is a nice enough player, but he didn't reach the bigs until he was 26 and was only really good from '03-'05. Other than that he's been a good catcher but nothing special at all. Certainly not the franchise player Weiters is purported to be.

Why didn't he reach the big leagues until he was 26?

He was represented by Scott Boras and didn't get a bonus that he liked when drafted by the Twins. Went back for his senior year of college and was drafted by the Mariners. With even less leverage it took almost a full year for him to sign and he never got the bonus he was looking for. Almost two years of development time lost. By delaying how quickly he could reach free agency he likely cost himself a ton of money. Certainly many times more than the amount of money he was holding out for.

Varitek's example is why if the Orioles put a fair offer on the table and stick to their guns, Wieters will sign. There is absolutely no reason for them to keep raising their offer as when push comes to shove, Boras knows he should take the offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never could have signed him to that type of deal.

The year before he hit free agency, the offseason before he became our closer, we could have had him for $15 mill over three years. Instead the O's wanted to make sure he could close first. See ya BJ!

As for whoever said its not Wednesday yet...I'm no Sherlock Holmes, but if past history is any indication, Weiters is not gonna sign!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why didn't he reach the big leagues until he was 26?

He was represented by Scott Boras and didn't get a bonus that he liked when drafted by the Twins. Went back for his senior year of college and was drafted by the Mariners. With even less leverage it took almost a full year for him to sign and he never got the bonus he was looking for. Almost two years of development time lost. By delaying how quickly he could reach free agency he likely cost himself a ton of money. Certainly many times more than the amount of money he was holding out for.

Varitek's example is why if the Orioles put a fair offer on the table and stick to their guns, Wieters will sign. There is absolutely no reason for them to keep raising their offer as when push comes to shove, Boras knows he should take the offer.

Or it's an example of playing extreme hardball with a Boras client and losing badly. I'd bet the Mariners and Twins fans and players aren't all that happy they were pawns in Bud's quest to keep signing bonuses down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or it's an example of playing extreme hardball with a Boras client and losing badly. I'd bet the Mariners and Twins fans and players aren't all that happy they were pawns in Bud's quest to keep signing bonuses down.

Pssh...are you kidding? I'm sure they take great solace in the fact that they held their ground against the Great Satan and eventually gave the Red Sox their best catcher in team history. Don't all fans care more about what Bud Selig wants than what's best for their team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or it's an example of playing extreme hardball with a Boras client and losing badly. I'd bet the Mariners and Twins fans and players aren't all that happy they were pawns in Bud's quest to keep signing bonuses down.

I don't believe the pheonomenom of MLB controlling signing bonuses by exerting pressure was in place back then. It was stupidity on Boras' part, he's grown and learned from his mistakes hence being willing to compromise like he did w/Drew, Weaver, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The year before he hit free agency, the offseason before he became our closer, we could have had him for $15 mill over three years. Instead the O's wanted to make sure he could close first. See ya BJ!
Not even remotely true. The O's would have gladly given him that deal, but BJ wanted to prove he could close and try to cash in with a huge deal. I was told this (not exact numbers) by Mike Flanagan, so I trust the source.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Talking about Varitek) By delaying how quickly he could reach free agency he likely cost himself a ton of money. Certainly many times more than the amount of money he was holding out for.

By missing those two year's, he also probably cost himself one extra big free agent payday. Instead of having three shots at a big free agent deal, he had only two. He's working on the last big contract he'll get, where he may have been entering a walk year this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. Look at Etchebarren's offensive numbers those two years (66-67). He was 17th in the MVP voting in 1966 despite a .221-11-50 line in 120 games. Kooky.

Anybody know the last all star catcher?

I'm guessing Charles Johnson but it wasn't with the Orioles even though he had that incredible season in 2000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even remotely true. The O's would have gladly given him that deal, but BJ wanted to prove he could close and try to cash in with a huge deal. I was told this (not exact numbers) by Mike Flanagan, so I trust the source.

Then where did the whole 3/$15 horse maneur come from? I certainly wasn't the one who came up with this. It has been commonly discussed on here for a few years. :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. Look at Etchebarren's offensive numbers those two years (66-67). He was 17th in the MVP voting in 1966 despite a .221-11-50 line in 120 games. Kooky.

Anybody know the last all star catcher?

The great Terry Kennedy in a season where he had a .299 OBP. Although to be fair he did have a pretty nice offensive season going on at the break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pure speculation on what posters thought would be a far amount to offer?

Really? I thought for sure the OH was ALL OVER the FO for not giving him that deal and waiting to see if he could close. Doesn't anybody remember this, or am I losing my mind???????? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Awesome research, thanks. I was a fan in 1974 but had forgotten that string of five shutouts.  This last two weeks of rotation excellence (and your list) is giving me flashbacks to the summer of love (1967), when I started to make game logs to savor the strings of shutouts and low-hit gems by Oriole starters. Looking back now at the game logs kept by Baseball-Reference (manually, without your sorting skills!), it's hard to identify exactly which streak so impressed my teenage fan-meter, or even which year. Certainly 1968 was all about low scoring league-wide.  Maybe it was the stretch 22-27 May 1967 featuring Phoebus, Bertaina, Barber, McNally, and Phoebus again (good old 4-man rotation!), including three scoreless outings. Or Hardin and Brabender joining Phoebus, McNally and Palmer from 15 to 20 September, 1967. What about 1969, with Cuellar, Lopez and Leonhard joining the previous cast of McNally, Phoebus, and Hardin, twirling 10 starts (13-22 June) while allowing only 12 runs.  Anyway, it feels rather historic to see this run of high-end pitching from an Orioles rotation. Here's a chart to recap the numbers on this streak in progress... Date Starter IP H ER ERA (14 G) totals: 81.67 59 19 2.09 21-Apr Irvin 6.2 4 0   22-Apr Suarez 5.2 4 0   23-Apr Rodriguez 4.1 11 7   24-Apr Kremer 5.1 3 2   26-Apr Burnes 6 3 1   27-Apr Irvin 7 4 0   28-Apr Suarez 4 7 4   29-Apr Rodriguez 5.2 5 0   30-Apr Kremer 7 4 2   1-May Burnes 6 4 2   2-May Bradish 4.2 4 1   3-May Irvin 6.1 2 0   4-May Means 7 3 0   5-May Kremer 6 1 0  
    • Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 
    • It was very obvious ...he would also take a look at his hand frequently. On Saturday, watching a clip in the dugout after one of the HR's, Kremer went to give a high five, pulled back and took a look at his hand. I thought it strange, and I thought something was off. He always appeared to be one of the more enthusiastic celebrators. It would seem the coaches would notice and probably did, but thought nothing of it. Certainly didn't affect his game.
    • Umpire really tried to screw us on Saturday.     
    • I heard someone call it The Great American Smallpark.
    • I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...