Jump to content

Offseason Trade Pondering


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

Seems to me like you just like being combative with me no matter what I post. 

I'm only suggesting that it might be appropriate to trade each of them for prospects that might be low risk high reward. Give me 5-6 international pitchers under the age of 18 who might turn into something. 

I'm not targeting you.  I don't even pay attention to whom I'm responding to probably 75% of the time.

The idea that one team could somehow make use of all three of them seems farfetched.  Which was kinda the point you were making???

The other part was directed at SG and his crusade to trade Mountcastle as much as you, or the OH in general.  Folks here LOVE trying to trade players they personally don't want on the team for value.  It's hardly ever a guy that would rather keep and having to make the tough decision.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not targeting you.  I don't even pay attention to whom I'm responding to probably 75% of the time.

The idea that one team could somehow make use of all three of them seems farfetched.  Which was kinda the point you were making???

The other part was directed at SG and his crusade to trade Mountcastle as much as you, or the OH in general.  Folks here LOVE trying to trade players they personally don't want on the team for value.  It's hardly ever a guy that would rather keep and having to make the tough decision.

 

I'm not on any crusade to do anything. I just care about what might improve the team.  If that means trading someone for the overall health of the organization, I'm all for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jagwar said:

What reliever do you think they could bring back?

Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever.

I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not targeting you.  I don't even pay attention to whom I'm responding to probably 75% of the time.

The idea that one team could somehow make use of all three of them seems farfetched.  Which was kinda the point you were making???

The other part was directed at SG and his crusade to trade Mountcastle as much as you, or the OH in general.  Folks here LOVE trying to trade players they personally don't want on the team for value.  It's hardly ever a guy that would rather keep and having to make the tough decision.

 

You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly.

These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jagwar said:

Maybe trade Mountcastle... or Mullins... or Urias... or all of them... for a bunch of lottery ticket pitching prospects? Or am I setting my sights too low?  

I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jagwar said:

What reliever do you think they could bring back?

I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA. 

What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have?

At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, EddeeEddee said:

I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.

I agree …but Bradfield had a .791 OPS at AA. So he may not be far away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA. 

What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have?

At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 

I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...