Jump to content

What will Bedard Command if we extend him??? Can we Afford Him?


i_miss_cal

Recommended Posts

I agree but we are going to have to give him extra money then we would have had we not ticked him off the first time we approached him with an extension.

I don't believe that. It's business, nothing personal. Put a good offer on the table, if he takes it great. If he doesn't, great - we'll trade him for a boatload of talent. Win/Win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 284
  • Created
  • Last Reply

After hearing about Zambrano's 5 year, 91 million dollar extension from the Cubs, what will it take to extend Bedard.......especially if he ends up winning the CY.

After apparently being insulted by the O's initially lowballing him, it might take and overpayment to get this guy to stay here.

5/100??........6/115??......

I don't know, it would take alot but I think he would be worth it.

I think some people on this board undervalue his impact. It is extremely difficult to find an absolute Ace in this league and it is nearly impossible to win the big one without an Ace.

I love potential we could get in return, but if Bedard keeps it up, he will be worth absolutely every penny. As Frobby said yesterday, since Trembley became manager we are 11-0 when Bedard pitches and 16-25 when he doesn't. You can't put a price on that record......well you can, and it'll prolly be about 20 million a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After hearing about Zambrano's 5 year, 91 million dollar extension from the Cubs, what will it take to extend Bedard.......especially if he ends up winning the CY.

After apparently being insulted by the O's initially lowballing him, it might take and overpayment to get this guy to stay here.

5/100??........6/115??......

I don't know, it would take alot but I think he would be worth it.

I think some people on this board undervalue his impact. It is extremely difficult to find an absolute Ace in this league and it is nearly impossible to win the big one without an Ace.

I love potential we could get in return, but if Bedard keeps it up, he will be worth absolutely every penny. As Frobby said yesterday, since Trembley became manager we are 11-0 when Bedard pitches and 16-25 when he doesn't. You can't put a price on that record......well you can, and it'll prolly be about 20 million a year.

Sweet Jeebus. Zambrano and Bedard's situations are not related at all. 4/55 or at the most 5/65 should get it done. And I'm being generous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, let me break down the 4/55 deal.

Bedard should be able to get 13-15 mil* in arbitration over the next two years. I'll be generous and say we should buy out his two arb. years for 15 mil. Then we grant him two more years at 18 mil per, bringing it to a total of 4/51. If you think he's worth 20 mil per in his two post FA-years (which is the most I'd be willing to go), then that brings it to 4/55. This is more than fair. Granting him a fifth year (at age 33ish) is very risky IMO but if we can lock him down by granting 10 mil or less for that 5th year I think we should consider it. Therefore, I think we might be able to get away with 4/50 and would be willing to go as high as 5/65.

*Total for two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, let me break down the 4/55 deal.

Bedard should be able to get 13-15 mil in arbitration over the next two years. I'll be generous and say we should buy out his two arb. years for 15 mil. Then we grant him two more years at 18 mil per, bringing it to a total of 4/51. If you think he's worth 20 mil per in his two post FA-years (which is the most I'd be willing to go), then that brings it to 4/55. This is more than fair. Granting him a fifth year (at age 33ish) is very risky IMO but if we can lock him down by granting 10 mil or less for that 5th year I think we should consider it. Therefore, I think we might be able to get away with 4/50 and would be willing to go as high as 5/65.

Total? For two years? Yeah, that's about right. Then straight into the 14, 16, 18... range. Depends on how long the deal is. 3/30, 4/45, 5/65, 6/85. All these are in range. And money well damn spent IMO. ;) Only restriction I'd put on would be 5 years total, 6 years if backed into an inescapable corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've thought about this and feel 5/75 is more than fair, and if we offer that, in my opinion, Bedard will take it. However this needs to be offered this offseason not at the last possible minute as we have seen the Orioles do times before with other targeted players or their own players. I don't want to worry about this guy heading into free agency after '09 get it done this winter. I was shocked to see some sites saying Bedard will be offered about 20 mil per etc. Trust me, i know he has been insanely good but its only his second good yr, and first dominant one, has baseballs economics gotten that nuts? BTW (off topic)for the record i also dont see A-rod making that 30+ mill people have whispered of as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've thought about this and feel 5/75 is more than fair, and if we offer that, in my opinion, Bedard will take it. However this needs to be offered this offseason not at the last possible minute as we have seen the Orioles do times before with other targeted players or their own players.

That's it right there! We need to make Erikkkk KNOW that we want him here. Blow him away! Break the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Total? For two years? Yeah, that's about right. Then straight into the 14, 16, 18... range. Depends on how long the deal is. 3/30, 4/45, 5/65, 6/85. All these are in range. And money well damn spent IMO. ;) Only restriction I'd put on would be 5 years total, 6 years if backed into an inescapable corner.

Yeah, total. Honestly, we'll probably have to overspend to keep Bedard here but the numbers I posted are objectively sound. I'd be fine with overspending some, he's an elite player, but the key is to keep the amount of years to 4 or 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, total. Honestly, we'll probably have to overspend to keep Bedard here but the numbers I posted are objectively sound. I'd be fine with overspending some, he's an elite player, but the key is to keep the amount of years to 4 or 5.

This is where I fear the problem comes in---from his perspective 6 or 7 years would be the goal. With his reliance on the curve, LOOKOUT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better question, what will he make in his next two years of arbitration. He makes 4.3 this year.

Will he make $8 and the $11 in arbitration the next two years. If so my offer to him would be 3 years and 42million, buying out one year of free agency and ensuring he would make $10 million more than he could in arbitration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better question, what will he make in his next two years of arbitration. He makes 4.3 this year.

Will he make $8 and the $11 in arbitration the next two years. If so my offer to him would be 3 years and 42million, buying out one year of free agency and ensuring he would make $10 million more than he could in arbitration.

He actually makes $3.4M this year, not $4.3M.

If he hits an absolute homerun in arbitration he'll get $6M this year and then about $10M in 2009. I think any contract extension will pay him about $14-15M total over those two years.

4/$48M or 5/$65M is the most it will take, and that's being very generous. People here GROSSLY overestimate how much it will take to extend Bedard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hypothetical contract offer to Bedard.

2008 $8 million

2009 $12 million

Then 2-3 years at $18 million per year.

That's 4/$56 million or 5/$74 million.

The arbitration years tell Bedard how much the team values him. The 2-3 years at $18 million tell Bedard the O's are willing to pay him top dollar. In return if Bedard turns down the offer, he is telling the Orioles he doesn't want to be in Baltimore and the team can reassess it's next move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever he wants can be afforded. This team isn't poor. They just need to decide whether he's worth it. And, they also need to weigh the talent they could get in return via trade. But, if they really want to keep him, they certanily can afford it. We aren't the Royals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Those numbers don’t include Stowers’ performance today, so his WAR will be up when you look tomorrow morning.  He’s earned himself some more playing time, but he’s not going to go from bench warmer to everyday player overnight.     
    • One of the amazing small plays of this game came in the 8th inning when Cowser caught a fly out with a runner on 3B and made a throw home that was about 15 feet up the the 1B line.  Adley raced up the line to grab it, but one of the infielders deflected it in the opposite direction of where Adley was running back towards home plate.  Adley somehow stopped his forward momentum and dove backwards on his back and snagged the ball. By the way, that’s the third time in the last few weeks that Cowser has made a terribly inaccurate throw to home plate.  It’s one thing to make the catcher move a step or two, but these throws have been 15+ feet off target.   
    • Kyle Stowers has 12 ABs and is already worth.1 bWAR. Hays is -1.0, and Mullins and Santander combined are .7 (Cowser, despite his exciting throwing, is 1.1) So there is ample reason to play Stowers….and to sit Hays/Mullins/Santander.
    • After watching Hernandez for years it became obvious that for most close calls he'd just flip a coin in his head and hope for the best. IMO the straw that broke the camel's back was the Mets / Tigers game where Angel ruled a pitch to Spencer Torkelson was a foul tip, which is reviewable. When the Tigers' manager came out to challenge the call Hernandez all of a sudden changed his call to a check swing, which isn't reviewable. Replays showed the pitch wasn't a foul ball and Torkelson never came close to swinging at it. It is reasonable to conclude that Angel Hernandez changed the original bad call to an even worse call just so he wouldn't be overruled by replay officials.    
    • Great, I’m heading to the Balkans in a few days anyway.  Im not saying I enjoy cock fights or dog fights, I am just saying I enjoy the collisions. I don’t want either guy to get hurt any more than, that sucked and am going to feel that in the morning. I thought it was great when they came in hard to second and the double play wasn’t automatic. Now you have the ghost tag of the base and the runner just jogs out of the way. I guess it is hard to explain but it is the difference of the NBA 30 years ago and now. Or NFL or MLB. 
    • Well, my personal spin on what OOO was saying is that Mike shouldn’t be adding guys like this one, and should instead be adding guys who will be a net positive. If there’s a glut, do something about the glut.
    • Tweaking guys is for the off-season and spring training not for when you really need guys who know what they’re doing already. Our pen is weak and this fellow doesn’t make it better, but worse. There’s nothing in his portfolio to indicate anything else. I realize the trade was probably actually for the other guy, but this fellow could easily have been immediately designated, cleared waivers, and then added to Norfolk, and then they could play around with him all they want. I remember when Brian Matusz was traded to the Braves along with a competitive balance pic which Dan did not value, and the Braves immediately designated him. They weren’t going to let him anywhere near a mound. Thats what should have been done with this guy.  Mr Vespi must be in tears, because he’s thinking “they wanted THIS guy more than me???”
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...