Jump to content

Carl Crawford reaches agreement with Boston (7yr 142mm)


sbauer

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well, the Red Sox just completely solidified their offense for the next 5-6 years.

Crawford - Ellsbury are going to be a nightmare on the basepaths. with the OBP of Youk behind them and AGon hitting clean-up...

Well, they're a good team regardless. Here's a question: how much better is Crawford + AGon vs. Beltre + VMart?

Aah, nevermind, this is ridiculous. I hate the Red Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's probably a good thing we didn't get too involved in free agency this offseason. The market has been absolutely insane. Remember when Jason Bay's contract seemed like an albatross?

Probably. We'll say it again next year too. So no worries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get this deal from the Red Sox's perspective. A lot of Crawford's value is in his great defense, and assuming he's going to be playing LF, his value in this regard is vastly negated by the field for half of his games.

As a hitter, he's very good, but not great: his 0.851 OPS this year was his career high, and his OPS for his career is 50 points behind Nick Markakis.

Obviously, if you have a huge budget, and overpaying on this contract doesn't move the needle for you financially, then it's justifiable, as it improves the team. But, in any case, I don't think you're getting good value for the money. And I can't imagine why the Red Sox would value him higher than any other team that doesn't play half its games at Fenway Park and the Green Monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...