Jump to content

Morning topic #1: who are our top options for 2nd round pick?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Should Norris be our #2 pick if he is there IYO?

Yes. There is no excuse not to overspend with the number of picks TAM/TOR/BOS received. Honestly, if it takes $4.5million to sign Josh Bell Baltimore should consider it in the 3rd or 4th round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. There is no excuse not to overspend with the number of picks TAM/TOR/BOS received. Honestly, if it takes $4.5million to sign Josh Bell Baltimore should consider it in the 3rd or 4th round.

I agree.

Is there any chance Bell says screw college for what you are hearing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, he will skip college but highly unlikely to come down at all on his demands (which I heard were "around top 5 money").

Is it worth it?

BA had him #15. Is he worth a 4ish million dollar investment IYO?

It sounds to me that he is, especially in our situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, he will skip college but highly unlikely to come down at all on his demands (which I heard were "around top 5 money").

This is when I really wish we had a Cuban-like owner. Of course, I'd prefer a different owner 365 days out of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it worth it?

BA had him #15. Is he worth a 4ish million dollar investment IYO?

It sounds to me that he is, especially in our situation.

Could you imagine if we picked and signed Bundy, Norris and Bell? That's looking at $13 million-ish dollars before the 4th round. Too good to be true, unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is when I really wish we had a Cuban-like owner. Of course, I'd prefer a different owner 365 days out of the year.

Yea...You could end up with Dylan, Norris and Bell here...Get 3 of the top 15ish players in this draft and spend 13-15 million.

You will have just added 3 guys that probably vault into your organizational top 5 prospect list and you get true, quality depth on top of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea...You could end up with Dylan, Norris and Bell here...Get 3 of the top 15ish players in this draft and spend 13-15 million.

You will have just added 3 guys that probably vault into your organizational top 5 prospect list and you get true, quality depth on top of that.

But we would rather spend 8 mill on Vlad and think that is a great signing to this day. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea...You could end up with Dylan, Norris and Bell here...Get 3 of the top 15ish players in this draft and spend 13-15 million.

You will have just added 3 guys that probably vault into your organizational top 5 prospect list and you get true, quality depth on top of that.

Given AM's stated preference to build through the draft versus internationally, this is exactly what should be done. If you believe there is more risk with international players, then you have to take the money you would spend internationally and spend it in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given AM's stated preference to build through the draft versus internationally, this is exactly what should be done. If you believe there is more risk with international players, then you have to take the money you would spend internationally and spend it in the draft.

Right...Again, he says one thing and then does another.

The Orioles like to point to how much they have spent in the draft...Well, again, that is because you have been paying out high prices to a top 5 picks. They have had some overslot guys here and there but they aren't doing as much spending as they lead on.

They should spend a boatload of money on this draft, especially when you consider that the rules could change and players may feel they need to take the money before a hard slotting system likely happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these prospects look good now, but in reality there are only a few stars in each draft class. Getting premium talent is nice, but there's still a huge amount of uncertainty so you're not going to spend 5 million dollars on somebody who is only "worth" 2 million.

Bell might be worth his price tag, but probably isn't signing, and would be a wasted pick (which is why nobody has picked him yet), Norris isn't even remotely a sure thing, and not worth what it's going to cost to buy him out of his commitment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right...Again, he says one thing and then does another.

The Orioles like to point to how much they have spent in the draft...Well, again, that is because you have been paying out high prices to a top 5 picks. They have had some overslot guys here and there but they aren't doing as much spending as they lead on.

They should spend a boatload of money on this draft, especially when you consider that the rules could change and players may feel they need to take the money before a hard slotting system likely happens.

I think we had a thread that combined draft and international spending over the last several years, and the Orioles were still well above average. The problem is, at least two teams in our own division were comfortably ahead of us, as I recall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it worth it?

BA had him #15. Is he worth a 4ish million dollar investment IYO?

It sounds to me that he is, especially in our situation.

Yeah, I'm not uneasy giving big money out in the draft -- especially with uncertainty as to what the draft looks like next year. I'd pay the money. I think the Tigers might at 2:15 today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Most quality major league starter's hold their velocity throughout their starts. They may cruise for a bit, but have it when they want it. Typically command goes long before velocity.
    • Do we not want to throw a left hander and take advantage of the spacious left field?
    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...