Jump to content

Fielder names his price


sangar

Recommended Posts

I actually figured that, as a Boras client and arguably the best positional option on the market, he'd ask for something even sillier. In the end, it doesn't really matter what these guys ask for. All that matters is how high the last team standing is willing to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's one way of looking at this: The O's haven't had a first baseman worth anything over the past fifteen years, I'd be willing to gamble that we don't find one worth anything over the next eight even near Fielder's potential production at age 35. Might as well pay Fielder and get 4 or 5 great years of production and another 3 to 4 of average to above-average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's one way of looking at this: The O's haven't had a first baseman worth anything over the past fifteen years, I'd be willing to gamble that we don't find one worth anything over the next eight even near Fielder's potential production at age 35. Might as well pay Fielder and get 4 or 5 great years of production and another 3 to 4 of average to above-average.

It's more like, "might as well take up roughly 30% of the payroll for the next 8 years in order to get an extra ~3-4 wins for 4 or 5 years and ~1-2 wins for 3 or 4 years over somebody we could pay peanuts for."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's more like, "might as well take up roughly 30% of the payroll for the next 8 years in order to get an extra ~3-4 wins for 4 or 5 years and ~1-2 wins for 3 or 4 years over somebody we could pay peanuts for."

Or... "the O's have sucked for a long time with reasonable payrolls, so now I'd prefer they have their ridiculous choices now include payroll, too."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's more like, "might as well take up roughly 30% of the payroll for the next 8 years in order to get an extra ~3-4 wins for 4 or 5 years and ~1-2 wins for 3 or 4 years over somebody we could pay peanuts for."

Or we can blow 30% of the payroll each year on garbage such as Huff, Vlad, D-Lee, Kelly Gregg, and Mike Gonzalez. We've done this for the past 12 years no reason why we won't do that for the next eight. I hear Melvin Mora and Miguel Tejada want to come back, we could pay them each $7 million a year. Don't get me wrong I completely see your point. If we were truly a team that built through the farm system and we maximized our payroll and budget in scouting, drafting and development then I would agree. But if we are going to continue this half-effort attempt to rebuild, at least Fielder brings, excitement, star power, and sells jerseys. And hey after five years or so he'll fall within that Vlad, D-Lee, Aubrey Huff caregory anyways and we will not need to do anything :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...