Jump to content

Per Roch: Bench depth being addressed...


BilboBaggins

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Don't worry it could be worse. We could be going after relief pitching. We've only tried to address that for about 10 years now.

I'm actually comfortable with the bullpen, but I'd rather have Gregg on the DL. A Koji return would be pleasant. If we actually had one starter, I'd be as happy as a Tiny Tim Christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually comfortable with the bullpen, but I'd rather have Gregg on the DL. A Koji return would be pleasant. If we actually had one starter, I'd be as happy as a Tiny Tim Christmas.

Amen. Think they have plenty of arms to fill out a bullpen with JJ closing. I would consider Koji as he was so effective for this team and genuinely loves playing here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Murphy really someone that is going to significanlty improve this lineup? Is having Davis/Reynolds/Murphy in whatever positional rotation that much better then Davis/Reynolds/Scott?

I think Murphy is appealing because you can plug him into so many different positions. Plus he's not going to kill you with his bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Murphy is appealing because you can plug him into so many different positions. Plus he's not going to kill you with his bat.

Yes but what would be the cost of trading for him, and is he worth that cost considering who we already have on the roster? I think I'd rather have Davis, Reynolds, and Scott at this point then trade for Murphy to take Scott's place. I don't think Murphy is that big of an upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but what would be the cost of trading for him, and is he worth that cost considering who we already have on the roster? I think I'd rather have Davis, Reynolds, and Scott at this point then trade for Murphy to take Scott's place. I don't think Murphy is that big of an upgrade.

Murphy was a 3.2 fWAR player last season and was an excellent fielder at all the IF positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but what would be the cost of trading for him, and is he worth that cost considering who we already have on the roster? I think I'd rather have Davis, Reynolds, and Scott at this point then trade for Murphy to take Scott's place. I don't think Murphy is that big of an upgrade.

I don't understand why you feel like Murphy would have to replace Scott?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the list:

Josh Bard (34)

Ramon Castro (36)

Ryan Doumit (31) - Type B

Jake Fox (29)

Ramon Hernandez (36) - Type A

Rob Johnson (28)

Jason Kendall (38)

Gerald Laird (32)

Jose Molina (36) - Type B

Dioner Navarro (28)

Ivan Rodriguez (40)

Brian Schneider (35)

Kelly Shoppach (32)

Chris Snyder (31) - Type B

J.R. Towles (28)

Jason Varitek (40) - Type B

Roch likes Molina.

What about Shoppach or Bard for just one year?

Laird signed with Texas. Doumit is down to two AL teams. The list grows shorter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good stuff. The bullpen does do a good job of getting groundballs and Bradish, GRod and Burnes are not flyball heavy pitchers although obviously GROd and Bradish have only been out there so much since the start of 2023 and Burnes is just 2024.  Still, they have kept those numbers down.
    • I twisted something and included Cohen.  That's my bad.  And I agree with almost all of this.  My post was more on tying the uber wealth of current ownership to simply having the ability to spend to any level.  The Orioles ownership group is one of the most powerful in all of sports.  I think they will make the Orioles more profitable and I think those profits will be reinvested in a way previous ownership did not. I do not anticipate, but would wildly applaud, ownership funding talent/salary increases out of pocket.  Thanks for the well articulated response.
    • Or another drop-off. Which is more likely at 37?
    • I don’t think we have heard that at all. I believe Elias said that Mateo should be a full go for ST. If what you are saying is accurate, I would agree it’s not worth keeping him around. I just don’t think it’s accurate.
    • Mateo is going to llikely miss the first part of the year and then be limited for much of the year d/t his elbow injury.  I think he won't be able to do much more than DH the early part of the year.  Is he worth signing just for 2025.  Imo, if the O's bring him back, it should be for 2 years.  It could be that Mateo is the backup 1B to Mayo, don't laugh.
    • His statcast page is really good though. He could be a candidate for a bounce back and will likely be a relatively cheap signing. I don’t love the fit but I can see the justification for doing it.
    • Mathematically I'm sure they will get better just because they have been so bad against the pass so far this year I can't imagine it getting much worse. I'm not so sure they will take a step forward against the team that has scored the most points in the whole NFL next Sunday though.   😬 Our best defensive game so far was against Josh Allen and the Bills though so I guess anything is possible.  You would think we would be able to come up with some schemes to confuse a rookie QB.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...