Jump to content

Gausman Signing Bonus - Parameters


Recommended Posts

Kevin Gausman was drafted by the Orioles as the fourth overall pick in the first round. Baseball America reports that 10 of the top 15 first rounders have signed. Gausman is among the five who have not signed - which also includes the third and sixth overall picks.

The MLB recommended slot for the fourth overall pick is $4.2M. Two of the three players drafted ahead of Gausman have signed. The first overall pick, Carlos Correa - a HS SS, signed for $4.8M - well below slot of $7.2M. The second overall pick, Byron Buxton - a HS OF, signed for $6.0M - just below slot of $6.2M. The fifth overall pick, Kyle Zimmer - college RHP, signed for $3.0M - below slot of $3.5M. Finally, the several overall pick, Max Fried - a HS LHP, signed for slot of $3.0M. There are several ways to interpret the data. Overall, the average signing versus slot is an average savings of approx $750k, but if the first and seventh picks are thrown out, then the average savings of the second and fifth picks is $350k - IMO, a potential data point relevant in the Gausman negotiations.

Looking back at last year, the first two picks were college pitchers, Cole and Hultzen, and both received signing bonuses in excess of $6M. IMO, the most comparable pitchers and draft picks to Gausman from last year were Trevor Bauer another college RHP who was drafted fourth overall with a signing bonus of $3.4M as part of a guaranteed $4.45M four year MLB contract. Last year's fourth rounder was, of course, Dylan Bundy. The Os signed Bundy to a $4.0M signing bonus as part of a five year MLB contract with a guarantee in the $6.2M ballpark.

I am going to use the Bundy signing bonus of $4.0M as a ceiling.

The average slot savings of $350k discussed above would result in a $3.85M signing bonus.

I am going to use a floor here of the Bauer contract - RHP college pitcher - of $3.4M. IMO, this contract/data point is the most applicable comp among all of the data.

So, my range would be $3.4M to $4.0M. I will split this range in half and predict a $3.7M bonus.

I am not sure that pre-draft analysis would have pegged the difference between Gausman and Zimmer at $700K, but this amount does free up the $ necessary to land Velasquez. It would not be surprising to see the Os look to spend Bauer-like $ and keep it closer to $3.4M to $3.5M. IMO, it would be more surprising for Gausman to get the $4.0M that Bundy received last year.

One final complicating factor is the second round contract for Kline. I am not sure if he will be a difficult signing - as in looking for more than slot - or if the Os need to create savings against slot for this spot as well. We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
One final complicating factor is the second round contract for Kline. I am not sure if he will be a difficult signing - as in looking for more than slot - or if the Os need to create savings against slot for this spot as well. We'll see.

It would surprise me if Kline would mess up a chance to pitch so close to home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or he could come back and be #1 and make more

He went #4 in a weak draft when injury concerns dropped Golito and contract demands dropped Appel. He might not have been top 10 in the 2011 draft. What are the odds he does higher next draft?

Would be a huge gamble for him to go back for his senior season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He went #4 in a weak draft when injury concerns dropped Golito and contract demands dropped Appel. He might not have been top 10 in the 2011 draft. What are the odds he does higher next draft?

Would be a huge gamble for him to go back for his senior season.

He was a sophomore. He has two years to get better which I am sure he will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a sophomore. He has two years to get better which I am sure he will.

I have to agree with CoC (Can of Corn), the risk that he slips from being drafted #4 overall to a lower draft slot for various reasons (injury, deeper draft, better pitchers) is a lot greater than the chances of being drafted above 4th overall.

Now, if he didn't like the Orioles or the system was as it was just last year than maybe he would walk from our offer, but I do not see it. I think that Gausman would be crazy to walk away from being the 1st overall pitcher selected and think that he could get more money by being another year older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a sophomore. He has two years to get better which I am sure he will.

I don't see him not signing and going back to school. I think he will sign for close to slot money, and hopefully will get better....much better....in an Orioles uniform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....or fall even lower or get injured and not get a cent.

So, come out now and get #4 money, or come back later where you give your services away for free for another year in exchange for a longshot of moving up to #1 or #2 to get a mil or two more, but will probably be about the same area, but could risk losing it all.

Doesn't seem like a hard choice to me. It's just a game of chicken on both sides. Both paties stand to lose a lot by standing their ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like we have $4,579,700 left to spend on our no. 1 and no. 5 picks. Should be able to get it done.

Is your figure before or after the 5% overage allowed before loss of picks?

I am still hopeful they can carve out enough extra cash for an overslot or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Nobody put words in your mouth.  I asked you questions.  That you can't answer them should suggest to you how thought out our positions are. 1) The goal is the World Series.  What makes you think it isn't? 2)  That's the most generic statement possible that is impossible to analyze, 3) So Elfin, Burnes, Bradish, Cano, etc.  don't count because you don't want them to count.  But other than that, he's got a bad track record of trading..... .like what trade?  Are we all supposed to go insane and only evaluate one trade- the Rodgers trade- in the most hyperbolic terms necessary to justify our hyperbole? 4) So we judge him for hypothetical trades that we didn't make and can't even be analyzed?  LOL. Flaherty was a worthless trade?  This is the same Flaherty that started Game 1 of the World Series this year, right? Oh, so you just want to cry about Rodgers ad nauseum?  Cry ahead. So you want to fire the most successful GM we've had since Pat Gillick but you haven't even thought about who'd you replace him with?  And wouldn't even bothered until he was fired?  You understand how stupid that is, right?
    • I think he’s all in. That’s why I have hope that he will resign Burnes and add some veteran offensive a talent to help the team play better in October 
    • This is as plausible a theory as any other that has been trotted out since the end of the regular season and it's one I fully subscribe to. Personally however, I think restraint is advisable when it comes to comparing his historical business leadership to his newfound role as 75 year-old billionaire owner of a a sports franchise.  Especially given his demonstrated propensity for dancing on the home team dugout during the seventh inning stretch.
    • Noted … I’d much rather have Teoscar. They would need to determine if Profar is the 2024 player or prior. 
    • Stop putting words in my mouth!    1) The goal needs to be the World Series 2) We need to spend wisely …but we need to spend 3) Oh Stop ….i gave him credit for Eflin and Burnes. The others were during the rebuild and selling trades. Which I said in my response to you,  4) It’s not one trade …. He’s tried to get help2 deadlines now. Beyond Eflin at two deadlines he’s done little to help the team reach the ultimate goal.    His moves in 2023 were Jack Flaherty who was basically worthless and Fuji who was so inconsistent that he’s not even pitching in the majors. Did I forget anyone? He did little to help an offense that was struggling mightily in 2024. He gave a lot away this deadline. They got Eflin but most everything else was mediocre or worse. The Rogers deal was just horrible. And why was he shopping in the bargain bin pile. Rogers was a 4.5 ERA starter before the trade which really wasn’t an upgrade and he crapped the bed after he got here.    I’m undecided over who I’d go after to replace Elias when the times comes.
    • In the estimation of bitter donkeys whose primary purpose for posting is to complain and criticize: infinite.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...