Jump to content

O's are raking it in


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Wasn't he baited by Sangar:scratchchinhmm:
Yes. That's a good point. But I think it's a safe assumption that MSK would have been here sooner or later with ...... his take on the matter of increased sales of Orioles merchandise. Also, Sangar is (understandably) annoyed with MSK's schtick of turning almost every thread that he posts in into his usual attack on the front office, which was the reason for his facetious post, so I'll allow myself to be biased in his favor cut him some slack for his hijack of the thread.

I don't necessarily disagree with MSK. In fact, I've been know to give him rep for making a good point. Nevertheless, how many times does a broken record have to skip before one gets tired of the song?

EDIT: Also, I plead guilty for intentionally baiting MSK. I offer my apologies to both MSK and the OP for derailing an otherwise fruitful thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't necessarily disagree with MSK. In fact, I've been know to give him rep for making a good point. Nevertheless, how many times does a broken record have to skip before one gets tired of the song?

I hate my self for picking on MSK, but even a broken clock is right twice a day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the O's don't receive that much of the merchandising revenue (it is correct that it is shared by all 30 teams except when sold at the stadium), the article also discusses how quickly the ticket "five packs" went and hints that season ticket sales will make a big jump, though Greg Bader is being dumure on that subject. I do think the O's could have been more aggressive so far this offseason. I'm waiting to see what else they do, but I'm bothered by losing Reynolds (who they actually could have signed for less than they paid him last year) and not replacing him with someone who is clearly better. I said all along that I wanted both him and MsLouth back unless their replacements were clearly better than they were. McLouth came back cheap and Reynolds was relatively cheap, too, but they let him go anyway. Righ now I'm unhappy about it but will wait and see what the roster looks like in mid-February before I react too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is DD the one deciding what to spend:scratchchinhmm:

I've always believed DD has had more flexibility this offseason than he's letting on. As wildcard pointed out in a different thread, if we re-sign Saunders and trade for Morse - both realistic possibilities - the 2013 budget approaches $100 million which is a significant bump from last year. DD is acting like these moves are already signed off on and not a special scenario requiring him to visit PA hat in hand looking for a raise.

The signings of DLee and Vlad under AM indicates to me that PA is open to persuasion in certain cases. I wouldn't be surprised if Duquette is holding that card in reserve for a time he felt was more advantageous. Personally, I think this year warrants a little more risk, but I remain fully willing to give DD the benefit of the doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the O's don't receive that much of the merchandising revenue (it is correct that it is shared by all 30 teams except when sold at the stadium), the article also discusses how quickly the ticket "five packs" went and hints that season ticket sales will make a big jump, though Greg Bader is being dumure on that subject. I do think the O's could have been more aggressive so far this offseason. I'm waiting to see what else they do, but I'm bothered by losing Reynolds (who they actually could have signed for less than they paid him last year) and not replacing him with someone who is clearly better. I said all along that I wanted both him and MsLouth back unless their replacements were clearly better than they were. McLouth came back cheap and Reynolds was relatively cheap, too, but they let him go anyway. Righ now I'm unhappy about it but will wait and see what the roster looks like in mid-February before I react too much.

Poetic justice for you FRobby. Cleveland suffers a ST injury to one of their starting pitchers and trades Mark Reynolds to the Orioles for Steve Johnson who they are secretly high on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning sells? Really???? Sports Business 101.

The bandwagoners came out in full force this winter...NICE! Now if the team is average or below by like June or so where will they be?!

I've not taken Sports business, but I've had plenty of business classes. And yes, quality sells.

Aside from that you make a good point about the potential for loss if a big contract was signed and regression occurred. If the Orioles signed Hamilton for 25 per, then went back into 70 win mode.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Nobody put words in your mouth.  I asked you questions.  That you can't answer them should suggest to you how thought out our positions are. 1) The goal is the World Series.  What makes you think it isn't? 2)  That's the most generic statement possible that is impossible to analyze, 3) So Elfin, Burnes, Bradish, Cano, etc.  don't count because you don't want them to count.  But other than that, he's got a bad track record of trading..... .like what trade?  Are we all supposed to go insane and only evaluate one trade- the Rodgers trade- in the most hyperbolic terms necessary to justify our hyperbole? 4) So we judge him for hypothetical trades that we didn't make and can't even be analyzed?  LOL. Flaherty was a worthless trade?  This is the same Flaherty that started Game 1 of the World Series this year, right? Oh, so you just want to cry about Rodgers ad nauseum?  Cry ahead. So you want to fire the most successful GM we've had since Pat Gillick but you haven't even thought about who'd you replace him with?  And wouldn't even bothered until he was fired?  You understand how stupid that is, right?
    • I think he’s all in. That’s why I have hope that he will resign Burnes and add some veteran offensive a talent to help the team play better in October 
    • This is as plausible a theory as any other that has been trotted out since the end of the regular season and it's one I fully subscribe to. Personally however, I think restraint is advisable when it comes to comparing his historical business leadership to his newfound role as 75 year-old billionaire owner of a a sports franchise.  Especially given his demonstrated propensity for dancing on the home team dugout during the seventh inning stretch.
    • Noted … I’d much rather have Teoscar. They would need to determine if Profar is the 2024 player or prior. 
    • Stop putting words in my mouth!    1) The goal needs to be the World Series 2) We need to spend wisely …but we need to spend 3) Oh Stop ….i gave him credit for Eflin and Burnes. The others were during the rebuild and selling trades. Which I said in my response to you,  4) It’s not one trade …. He’s tried to get help2 deadlines now. Beyond Eflin at two deadlines he’s done little to help the team reach the ultimate goal.    His moves in 2023 were Jack Flaherty who was basically worthless and Fuji who was so inconsistent that he’s not even pitching in the majors. Did I forget anyone? He did little to help an offense that was struggling mightily in 2024. He gave a lot away this deadline. They got Eflin but most everything else was mediocre or worse. The Rogers deal was just horrible. And why was he shopping in the bargain bin pile. Rogers was a 4.5 ERA starter before the trade which really wasn’t an upgrade and he crapped the bed after he got here.    I’m undecided over who I’d go after to replace Elias when the times comes.
    • In the estimation of bitter donkeys whose primary purpose for posting is to complain and criticize: infinite.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...