Jump to content

Rosenthal on Gausman and Bundy


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Gomes compares Gausman to Verlander after facing Gausman.

"A young guy like that who throws 98 and can throw his off-speed stuff for strikes " forget about it," Gomes said.

Well, Jonny, scouts say that while Gausman?s changeup is nasty, his slider is a work in progress "

"He doesn?t need it to be good," Gomes interrupted. "If you?ve got three plus-plus pitches, now you?re Verlander. You should be OK with a little less than Verlander."

http://nmsn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/baltimore-orioles-have-abundance-of-starting-pitchers-giving-them-built-in-flexibility-031913

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We talked about this last week and I said lets see how Gausman is doing after three or four more appearances. If I'm Buck i'm liking him too much to send to Bowie or Norfolk and would start the season with him. We all know the hitters struggle in April due to the cold weather in most places. The hitters are wearing extra layers and him throwing upper 90's and mixing with pitches in the low 80's will make it extremely difficult for hitters to make contact and his K's should continue to be high. His line yesterday against Bostons regulars was 2 innings, 0 hits, 0 walks, 0 runs and 3 k's. We need to get off to a good start in April. Has anyone noticed the box scores lately for the NYY? They are struggling to score runs and getting very few hits. Anemic lineup currently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying not to get hopes too high....trying not to get hopes too high....

This. I was positive that Matusz, Britton, Tillman, Arrieta, and Bergman would be our rotation for years.

I've accepted that I don't know a damn thing and that I should just let it play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only seen Gausman pitch "live" in his spring start last Thursday and the movement on his fastball and Change are just down right filthy. If his slider develops into a pitch he can throw for strikes and keep it down in the zone, he'll be a TOR for us, no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. I was positive that Matusz, Britton, Tillman, Arrieta, and Bergman would be our rotation for years.

I've accepted that I don't know a damn thing and that I should just let it play out.

Well, you should have never had much faith in Dave Bergman as a starter. He was a left-handed hitting outfielder/first baseman first. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been wanting to make the Verlander comp for a little while, but I've been waiting for someone else to beat me to it. Man, that would be such a shot in the arm for us (captain obvious).

I think it should be clear that Gomes was saying Gausman would be comparable to Verlander if he had a plus-plus curve, which he doesn't. His fastball and change are comparable, and Gomes was saying that's enough by itself to make him effective, but he ain't Verlander without a good third pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you should have never had much faith in Dave Bergman as a starter. He was a left-handed hitting outfielder/first baseman first. :D

I didn't think Brad Bergesen would stick too long, but i did have good hopes for John Maine. Wasn't too happy we traded him to the Mets along with Julio for one healthy season from Kris Benson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it should be clear that Gomes was saying Gausman would be comparable to Verlander if he had a plus-plus curve, which he doesn't. His fastball and change are comparable, and Gomes was saying that's enough by itself to make him effective, but he ain't Verlander without a good third pitch.

Yes. He was saying that only "Verlander" have three Plus-Plus pitches. And it does not take that to be a good starter in the ML. He is saying that Gausman has two Plus Pluses right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Nobody put words in your mouth.  I asked you questions.  That you can't answer them should suggest to you how thought out our positions are. 1) The goal is the World Series.  What makes you think it isn't? 2)  That's the most generic statement possible that is impossible to analyze, 3) So Elfin, Burnes, Bradish, Cano, etc.  don't count because you don't want them to count.  But other than that, he's got a bad track record of trading..... .like what trade?  Are we all supposed to go insane and only evaluate one trade- the Rodgers trade- in the most hyperbolic terms necessary to justify our hyperbole? 4) So we judge him for hypothetical trades that we didn't make and can't even be analyzed?  LOL. Flaherty was a worthless trade?  This is the same Flaherty that started Game 1 of the World Series this year, right? Oh, so you just want to cry about Rodgers ad nauseum?  Cry ahead. So you want to fire the most successful GM we've had since Pat Gillick but you haven't even thought about who'd you replace him with?  And wouldn't even bothered until he was fired?  You understand how stupid that is, right?
    • I think he’s all in. That’s why I have hope that he will resign Burnes and add some veteran offensive a talent to help the team play better in October 
    • This is as plausible a theory as any other that has been trotted out since the end of the regular season and it's one I fully subscribe to. Personally however, I think restraint is advisable when it comes to comparing his historical business leadership to his newfound role as 75 year-old billionaire owner of a a sports franchise.  Especially given his demonstrated propensity for dancing on the home team dugout during the seventh inning stretch.
    • Noted … I’d much rather have Teoscar. They would need to determine if Profar is the 2024 player or prior. 
    • Stop putting words in my mouth!    1) The goal needs to be the World Series 2) We need to spend wisely …but we need to spend 3) Oh Stop ….i gave him credit for Eflin and Burnes. The others were during the rebuild and selling trades. Which I said in my response to you,  4) It’s not one trade …. He’s tried to get help2 deadlines now. Beyond Eflin at two deadlines he’s done little to help the team reach the ultimate goal.    His moves in 2023 were Jack Flaherty who was basically worthless and Fuji who was so inconsistent that he’s not even pitching in the majors. Did I forget anyone? He did little to help an offense that was struggling mightily in 2024. He gave a lot away this deadline. They got Eflin but most everything else was mediocre or worse. The Rogers deal was just horrible. And why was he shopping in the bargain bin pile. Rogers was a 4.5 ERA starter before the trade which really wasn’t an upgrade and he crapped the bed after he got here.    I’m undecided over who I’d go after to replace Elias when the times comes.
    • In the estimation of bitter donkeys whose primary purpose for posting is to complain and criticize: infinite.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...