Jump to content

Rosenthal on Gausman and Bundy


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I personally had Scorsese pegged for that.

Scorsese would do that a good amount, but he would mix in a stifling curveball, and a forkball, or something weird. Regardless, he will still find a way to strike you out.

Michael Bay on the other hand, if he connects with your head, and you're left on the ground unconscious to logic because the booms and pows were too loud, he's happy. If you consistently dodge the fastballs coming at your head, and stare back ambivalently with hate and sheer wonderment for his persistence, well, he doesn't care. He's got a ridiculous guaranteed contract from Hollywood and he still pitches every 5th day (and 4th of July).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Gomes knows is he can't hit Gausman stuff. But then again he can't hit a lot of righthander's stuff. Now if Longoria or Cabrera said that about Gausman it would mean more to me. I think considering the source is wise.

So a major league hitter with 3060 major league plate appearances who has played for 8 years in the major leagues is not a good source to compare stuff between Bundy and Gausman because he hits left-handers better than right-handers? Gomes is certainly better against left-handed pitching, but he does have 381 hits and 86 major league home runs off of right-handers in his career so it's not like he's terrible against them. Gomes just compared their stuff that day. He's as good a source as you can get for the comparison of stuff for that day because he faced both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a major league hitter with 3060 major league plate appearances who has played for 8 years in the major leagues is not a good source to compare stuff between Bundy and Gausman because he hits left-handers better than right-handers? Gomes is certainly better against left-handed pitching, but he does have 381 hits and 86 major league home runs off of right-handers in his career so it's not like he's terrible against them. Gomes just compared their stuff that day. He's as good a source as you can get for the comparison of stuff for that day because he faced both.

Agree, but with emphasis on "for that day". Gomes isn't in especially good position to judge who projects to be better long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree, but with emphasis on "for that day". Gomes isn't in especially good position to judge who projects to be better long term.

Agreed, which is not what Gomes was saying from what I gathered. As of now, no one knows who will become a better pitcher, and I honestly think they are both going to be very good, but I would not discount a long-time major leagues player's evaluation of stuff because he hasn't hit right-handers particularly well over his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...