Jump to content

It's Official, We are Contenders and Probably Favorites


brianod

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
One thing that needs to be noted in this thread (I very well could have missed it if it already was):

No team in the Majors has played fewer home games than the Orioles. That bodes well, methinks.

And they haven't played the Astros. I alluded to that on page 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do the various strength of schedule ratings that people have dug up for this thread just take into account who you have played? Or do they talk home/road into account. After all, there IS a home field advantage, home teams win, what, 54% of the time and lost 46% of the time or something like that? So regardless of the specific opponents we have had, our schedule has been tougher because so much of it has been on the road. Especially when compared with Boston, who has spent a good chunk of the early season in Fenway.

Yes sir. Home teams win 53.85% so far this year

http://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/mlb/trends/league/season.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say we are one of 3 favorites to win the division. And I don't believe the Yankees are for real. Their lineup can't hold up for a season and I don'; expect great things from Jeter and Tex when ever they come back. BOS maybe, if Lester and Bucholz keep it up. They just lost two RP though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say we are one of 3 favorites to win the division. And I don't believe the Yankees are for real. Their lineup can't hold up for a season and I don'; expect great things from Jeter and Tex when ever they come back. BOS maybe, if Lester and Bucholz keep it up. They just lost two RP though.

Strange that Bucholz had his worst game after Morris accused him of throwing a spitter. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frobby, you of all people should know that we caught both the Yankees and Red Sox(especially the Red Sox) AND Toronto in especially tough

injury and personnel situations last year. I AM NOT SAYING WE WERE LUCKY OR NOT GOOD. I AM saying that the Sox are infinitely better and the

Yankees will be getting their regular squad together for the second half and I feel the Rays will get Price going again and play better. I just think our

starters will have to be a lot better than last year and we have to avoid injuries like the others. Of course I think we can contend, especially if our

pitching reserves step up and we figure out a solution at 2b(Roberts returns and plays well?). But this season 9th in ERA will not be good enough to

get into the playoffs.

Bottom line is we are 7th in the AL with a 3.88 ERA

Boston 5th 3.64

NY 6th 3.87

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frobby, you of all people should know that we caught both the Yankees and Red Sox(especially the Red Sox) AND Toronto in especially tough

injury and personnel situations last year. I AM NOT SAYING WE WERE LUCKY OR NOT GOOD. I AM saying that the Sox are infinitely better and the

Yankees will be getting their regular squad together for the second half and I feel the Rays will get Price going again and play better. I just think our

starters will have to be a lot better than last year and we have to avoid injuries like the others. Of course I think we can contend, especially if our

pitching reserves step up and we figure out a solution at 2b(Roberts returns and plays well?). But this season 9th in ERA will not be good enough to

get into the playoffs.

Actually, I agree with you on this. I wrote many posts in the offseason stating that for the O's to return to the playoffs their starting pitching would need to be better. So far, it hasn't been, but we've been carried by an offense that is averaging 4.97 runs per game, which is better than I expected. I think the offense eventually will cool down, whcih means the pitching (by which I mean, the starting pitching) will need to pick up the slack. But that doesn't mean that we have to have one of the top rotations in the league -- average/slightly better starting pitching should be good enough, with our excellent bullpen, to give us above average pitching overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frobby, you of all people should know that we caught both the Yankees and Red Sox(especially the Red Sox) AND Toronto in especially tough

injury and personnel situations last year. I AM NOT SAYING WE WERE LUCKY OR NOT GOOD. I AM saying that the Sox are infinitely better and the

Yankees will be getting their regular squad together for the second half and I feel the Rays will get Price going again and play better. I just think our

starters will have to be a lot better than last year and we have to avoid injuries like the others. Of course I think we can contend, especially if our

pitching reserves step up and we figure out a solution at 2b(Roberts returns and plays well?). But this season 9th in ERA will not be good enough to

get into the playoffs.

Actually, I agree with you on this. I wrote many posts in the offseason stating that for the O's to return to the playoffs their starting pitching would need to be better. So far, it hasn't been, but we've been carried by an offense that is averaging 4.97 runs per game, which is better than I expected. I think the offense eventually will cool down, whcih means the pitching (by which I mean, the starting pitching) will need to pick up the slack. But that doesn't mean that we have to have one of the top rotations in the league -- average/slightly better starting pitching should be good enough, with our excellent bullpen, to give us above average pitching overall.

Roy, your point is valid as Frobby notes. The Orioles will need to improve their overall pitching ERA from 9th last year to make the playoffs this year. However, everything else in your post does the ole slight of hand and describes the Yankees and Redsox from the top down (in otherwords, best case scenario) and then sticks the Orioles in for comparison with a bottom up approach.

Look I do not care about luck, the simple fact is over the last 12-18 months the Orioles have played some pretty darn good baseball and have gotten better along the way and at the same time managed to get younger. They may not have reached the mountain top but they are moving in the right direction and while they will have to prove it over the course of the rest of this season and next...I will just have to say it....

The Orioles are a better team top to bottom than either the Redsox or the Yankees.

Ok, that scared me a little, but I feel pretty damn good. Come on Roy, you want to say it....you need to say it. :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say we are one of 3 favorites to win the division. And I don't believe the Yankees are for real. Their lineup can't hold up for a season and I don'; expect great things from Jeter and Tex when ever they come back. BOS maybe, if Lester and Bucholz keep it up. They just lost two RP though.

Well if you say it, I guess it must be so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roy, your point is valid as Frobby notes. The Orioles will need to improve their overall pitching ERA from 9th last year to make the playoffs.

Actually, they were 9th in starter ERA, 6th in overall ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roy, your point is valid as Frobby notes. The Orioles will need to improve their overall pitching ERA from 9th last year to make the playoffs this year. However, everything else in your post does the ole slight of hand and describes the Yankees and Redsox from the top down (in otherwords, best case scenario) and then sticks the Orioles in for comparison with a bottom up approach.

Look I do not care about luck, the simple fact is over the last 12-18 months the Orioles have played some pretty darn good baseball and have gotten better along the way and at the same time managed to get younger. They may not have reached the mountain top but they are moving in the right direction and while they will have to prove it over the course of the rest of this season and next...I will just have to say it....

The Orioles are a better team top to bottom than either the Redsox or the Yankees.

Ok, that scared me a little, but I feel pretty damn good. Come on Roy, you want to say it....you need to say it. :eek:

Great post. I agree. We are better. Not only that, we may just have more money to spend then the Yankees for another player or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team has a special something. Lot of that has to do with the character of the guys they have brought in. The word that comes to mind when I think of the O's is tenacious. We are 20-13 getting little to no offensive output from our DH and 2B positions. Our starting pitching has been adequate but not spectacular. I think there is significant room for this team to improve as the season progresses either through guys getting back (Betemit), trades or just guys in the starting staff getting into their groove and improving. Feeling very very optimistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We look good. Still a lot of baseball to be played but right now, we're showing that last year's team was no fluke.

No doubt. I think this team has some really nice pieces to work with but more importantly they have leadership that promotes and has instilled in them the belief that they are winners, they should win, and as a result you see a team that make you work to beat them. Imagine what they can do if the starters start to get in a grove with consistency and they find someone who can provide some output at DH....very very dangerous team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...