Jump to content

St Louis Post-Dispatch : Best Shortstop Fit for the Cardinals is JJ Hardy


jamesenoch

Recommended Posts

All the talk about landing Freese can stop now...

FOX Sports' Ken Rosenthal reports that the Cardinals have acquired Peter Bourjos from the Angels.

Yahoo's Tim Brown tweets that while Bourjos and Freese are the primary players in the deal, a couple other pieces are involved as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Splitting hairs -- he turns in-season. Point is exact same. Baltimore got its surpluss value from Hardy. Absolutely no reason to pay market price for him as he enters his mid-30s.

August 19 is 40 days from the end of the season and not close to age 36 which you quoted. You will have to speak to the World Champion Red Sox about signing players in their 30's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the talk about landing Freese can stop now...

I just saw that. Many of the Cardinals fans will be absolutely delirious with joy over this deal. They would have given Freese and Salas away to get them off the team. Getting a plus center fielder and an outfield prospect with power who's played more CF than the corners just makes it better and better.

This trade implies that Mozeliak is in tune with the fan on the street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just saw that. Many of the Cardinals fans will be absolutely delirious with joy over this deal. They would have given Freese and Salas away to get them off the team. Getting a plus center fielder and an outfield prospect with power who's played more CF than the corners just makes it better and better.

This trade implies that Mozeliak is in tune with the fan on the street.

I think this trade just reveals that Mozeliak knows what he is doing, regardless what the fan on the street thinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.688 career ops and a 84 ops + ? mixed with a .339 obp which is decent i guess. He steals a lot of bases i guess I just don't see the big deal with him.

Top 10 defensive shortstop (some metrics have him higher) and arguably a top 5 baserunner in the game (1st-3rd, 1st-home, 2nd-home, SB) with enough OBP to hit at the top of your order (particularly when paired with the high-level baserunning.

He had a "bad" offensive year last year and was probably worth something like 3 wins. If he hits at all, he's a 4+ win player at the second most difficult position to fill on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 10 defensive shortstop (some metrics have him higher) and arguably a top 5 baserunner in the game (1st-3rd, 1st-home, 2nd-home, SB) with enough OBP to hit at the top of your order (particularly when paired with the high-level baserunning.

He had a "bad" offensive year last year and was probably worth something like 3 wins. If he hits at all, he's a 4+ win player at the second most difficult position to fill on the field.

Ah I didn't even check his WAR and I didn't realize he was so good defensively. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...