Jump to content

Disagreeing With The Smartest Man In The Room


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

I don't think Billy values prospects like you and I do. If there is a free Jonny Gomes to be had.

I think you're spot on here. I don't think he values them as much as we might think he does. The other day they had the A's assistant GM was on MLB Radio and was basically stating how a lot of their players, especially their position players, are former undervalued ML players from other organizations and not developed or even acquired prospects. He said the used data mining to identify these players and the stat people gave them to the scouts to fully evaluate them. He mentioned Moss, Lowrie, Donaldson and Jaso etc. but there are a lot more of you go through their roster the past few years. Even Coco Crisp was a pretty undervalued free agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think you're spot on here. I don't think he values them as much as we might think he does. The other day they had the A's assistant GM was on MLB Radio and was basically stating how a lot of their players, especially their position players, are former undervalued ML players from other organizations and not developed or even acquired prospects. He said the used data mining to identify these players and the stat people gave them to the scouts to fully evaluate them. He mentioned Moss, Lowrie, Donaldson and Jaso etc. but there are a lot more of you go through their roster the past few years. Even Coco Crisp was a pretty undervalued free agent.

Yes, the fact is Moneyball was about finding value where others couldn't. Whether or not he's got it right this year he has staked out a path.

And people may be forgetting that Cespedes was not going to be re-signed by the A's long term and his current contract precluded them from making him a QO after 2015. His future value was more limited than you might imagine. So, if he really believes this is his shot then he's making a bold move.

After watching struggle to score any runs vs Guthrie last night, though, he had better hope that Reddick or someone of the guys that were undervalued by other teams are able to step for the production he's losing with Cespedes. I looked at them and thought, "These guys have all been playing over their heads," not "Oh, these guys are undervalued."

However, if I look at what he's done and the way he's done it I do it the same way. The pitching he's assembled is perfect to make a run in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After watching struggle to score any runs vs Guthrie last night, though, he had better hope that Reddick or someone of the guys that were undervalued by other teams are able to step for the production he's losing with Cespedes. I looked at them and thought, "These guys have all been playing over their heads," not "Oh, these guys are undervalued."

Billy knew they were definitely pitching over their heads. He's gonna freak at the first round exit again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the fact is Moneyball was about finding value where others couldn't. Whether or not he's got it right this year he has staked out a path.

And people may be forgetting that Cespedes was not going to be re-signed by the A's long term and his current contract precluded them from making him a QO after 2015. His future value was more limited than you might imagine. So, if he really believes this is his shot then he's making a bold move.

After watching struggle to score any runs vs Guthrie last night, though, he had better hope that Reddick or someone of the guys that were undervalued by other teams are able to step for the production he's losing with Cespedes. I looked at them and thought, "These guys have all been playing over their heads," not "Oh, these guys are undervalued."

However, if I look at what he's done and the way he's done it I do it the same way. The pitching he's assembled is perfect to make a run in the playoffs.

Yeah, I think people mistakenly have gotten the impression that Beane is in the business of churning established players for prospects. That's not really the case. Obviously he has done some of that, probably more with pitchers. He has obviously been much more financially constrained in the past than this year also.

I totally get the multiple TOR leverage strategy, but I'm stlll pretty mixed if this Lester trade was smart or not (especially when I'm seeing Fuld and Gomes in the OF instead of Cespedes and Crisp), but I guess Vogt has been good for them recently.

We'll see how it goes for them I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You said "watch". I think they pay attention to their in house version of defensive metrics. Just look at the shifting.

I've heard Dan mention UZR more than a few times now. I doubt AM even knew what it was. Like you said, I'm sure every team has more enhanced/propriety data other than what UZR/DRS provides to the public, but other than level of detail and the ability to act on the data with specific strategies, I doubt it's much different in most cases than what we see on the aggregate scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard Dan mention UZR more than a few times now. I doubt AM even knew what it wast was. Like you said, I'm sure every team has more enhanced data than what UZR/DRS publishes, but other than level of detail and the ability to act on the data with specific strategies, I doubt it's much different in most cases than what we see on the aggregate scale.

Dan bought the Orioles the full Bloomberg System.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't surprise me a bit. We were doing Buck's "hug the line strategy" for shifts before DD came along. It's really amazing how far Duquette has brought this organization into the light imo.

Dan was playing Moneyball before Billy made it vogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't surprise me a bit. We were doing Buck's "hug the line strategy" for shifts before DD came along. It's really amazing how far Duquette has brought this organization into the light imo.

And Brady. Brady is a big change agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't surprise me a bit. We were doing Buck's "hug the line strategy" for shifts before DD came along. It's really amazing how far Duquette has brought this organization into the light imo.

https://www.bsports.com/about#.U91pqvldWSo

Working with our franchise partners, we have developed player-centric applications to assess performances and aid the preparation of upcoming games. Video solutions are tailored to each player with the ability to download video clips locally to the device. The platform will be extended to professional players across sports.

playersolution.jpg

...Predictive analytics a reality with algorithmic engines combined with sporting expertise. We have achieved measurable success and now create APIs to power applications for global clients
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I always thought that if you weren't around 10:1 you weren't trying hard enough.
    • Adley was a nearly finished product when picked, if not for tradition and service time stuff he could have been in the majors shortly after he left college. Gunnar needed 1000+ minor league plate appearances as a high school pick. Ask this same question about the 1990-2017 Orioles with their development system. They certainly could have found a way to screw up Gunnar, would have been harder with Adley.
    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...