Jump to content

Is this a fair deal for the O's AND Cubs?


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

Mods, if you don't feel like this deserves a separate thread, please, feel free to merge with one of the other Roberts-Cubs threads.

Baltimore gets Ronny Cedeno, Sean Gallagher, Jason Marquis, Matt Murton and Donnie Veal

Chicago gets Jay Payton and Brian Roberts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

No, sorry I don't because the rumored offer on the table for Brian is Murton, Gallagher, Cedeno, and Veal 4-1. Marquis has negative value because of his contract, and while Payton doesn't have MUCH value because of his, he still does. For us to take back Marquis, Pie has to be attached. Unless we are swapping Marquis for Gibbons and Mora of course :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mods, if you don't feel like this deserves a separate thread, please, feel free to merge with one of the other Roberts-Cubs threads.

Baltimore gets Ronny Cedeno, Sean Gallagher, Jason Marquis, Matt Murton and Donnie Veal

Chicago gets Jay Payton and Brian Roberts

I think we could get Cedeno, Murton, Veal and Gallagher for BRob. So Payton becomes a swap for Marquis. I don't think I would make that trade straight up, but if that is what it takes to get the big deal done, I would probably do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, sorry I don't because the rumored offer on the table for Brian is Murton, Gallagher, Cedeno, and Veal 4-1. Marquis has negative value because of his contract, and while Payton doesn't have MUCH value because of his, he still does. For us to take back Marquis, Pie has to be attached. Unless we are swapping Marquis for Gibbons and Mora of course :)

I don't see how Payton has more value than Marquis. Payton is an aging, light-hitting, mediocre fielding, whining malcontent of a corner outfielder with $4.5 million on his contract. I don't think Payton should be on any 25 man roster at all, let alone for millions of dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we could get Cedeno, Murton, Veal and Gallagher for BRob. So Payton becomes a swap for Marquis. I don't think I would make that trade straight up, but if that is what it takes to get the big deal done, I would probably do it.

I thought the deal was a 4-1 too, but then someone else (unfortunately, I don't remember who) said we'd only be able to get that package IF we took on Marquis.

It's certainly an interesting topic for debate though. One poster already thinks we're screwing the Cubs, while another thinks we're the ones getting screwed. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how Payton has more value than Marquis. Payton is an aging, light-hitting, mediocre fielding, whining malcontent of a corner outfielder with $4.5 million on his contract. I don't think Payton should be on any 25 man roster at all, let alone for millions of dollars.

I've read that Marquis' attitude isn't the best either. Apparently he had real problems with LaRussa and Duncan in St. Louis. Sorry, I can't cite a source, but I'm pretty sure that it was an OH thread I read that in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mods, if you don't feel like this deserves a separate thread, please, feel free to merge with one of the other Roberts-Cubs threads.

Baltimore gets Ronny Cedeno, Sean Gallagher, Jason Marquis, Matt Murton and Donnie Veal

Chicago gets Jay Payton and Brian Roberts

make that deal and you are losing 2 - 40 man roster spots too...

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/team/roster_40man.jsp?c_id=chc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read that Marquis' attitude isn't the best either. Apparently he had real problems with LaRussa and Duncan in St. Louis. Sorry, I can't cite a source, but I'm pretty sure that it was an OH thread I read that in.

Well MacPhail has basically said that he is going to acquire an innings eater. Therefore, I would think he would see Marquis as a positive piece in a deal, albeit a minor one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mods, if you don't feel like this deserves a separate thread, please, feel free to merge with one of the other Roberts-Cubs threads.

Baltimore gets Ronny Cedeno, Sean Gallagher, Jason Marquis, Matt Murton and Donnie Veal

Chicago gets Jay Payton and Brian Roberts

I, for one, would do this. McPhail made it clear today that they are looking for a veteran innings eater to anchor the rotation. I can't imagine Livan Hernandez signing here, so I think we could do a lot worse than Marquis to fill this role. Again, I am saying this becasue it seems clear that this is in the O's plan, not because I necessarily think they should do this or need to do this.

Contention this year is not really in the plans, so I don't see the harm in having a guy in the roation who can easily pitch somewhere between 190 to 210 innings for us and allow further development for whoever doesn't break camp in the rotation (Olson, Penn, Patton, Albers, whoever...).

Now the thing about this allegedly proposed 4 for 1 is that we don't really know which side offered the deal, or if the other side, whichever side that is, actually likes the deal.

One way or the other I hope we hear some news about what is likely to happen so we can just start to focus on ST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mods, if you don't feel like this deserves a separate thread, please, feel free to merge with one of the other Roberts-Cubs threads.

Baltimore gets Ronny Cedeno, Sean Gallagher, Jason Marquis, Matt Murton and Donnie Veal

Chicago gets Jay Payton and Brian Roberts

That would be an atrocious deal for the Cubs. I'm sorry, but that is not close to equal value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be an atrocious deal for the Cubs. I'm sorry, but that is not close to equal value.

I'm just trying to piece together everything we've heard.

First, one of our insiders reported that the Cubs had a deal of Cedeno, Gallagher, Murton, and Veal on the table for Roberts. Then another poster (I don't remember if it was an insider or not) said that we'd get a package like that on one condition, if we took Marquis off the Cubs hands. As for Payton, I could've sworn Sports Guy said that we'd look to deal him (along with Roberts) to Chicago, but don't quote me on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Cubs fan, I could live with that deal given Payton can play 30-35 games in CF. Does he have the range to be able to do that still with two quick corner outfielders? It would be great to give Pie the day off when facing tough lefties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...