Jump to content

Sun-Times says O's want Cedeno, Gallagher, and 2 more prospects


Bigbie03

Recommended Posts

Well Cindy; for what it's worth (and I realize it is very little). In a response to Dan Connolly's article regarding Tex in the Sun today, someone claiming insider information said McPhail has spoken to Boras and was told there is no way Tex is coming here if we trade BRob.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/baseball/bal-sp.connolly28feb28,0,227944.column

Our FO has us on a very nice course to compete for several years starting in 2010 or 2011. If Tex wants to go to NYY and compete every year, that's fine. It would be crying shame for all involved if we do become very competitive in the 2010/11 time frame and start making the playoffs and Tex sits at home during the post-season because he thought we'd be awful without BRob in Spring Training 2008.

As an aside, I think the supposed insider info is pure bologna.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 413
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well Cindy; for what it's worth (and I realize it is very little). In a response to Dan Connolly's article regarding Tex in the Sun today, someone claiming insider information said McPhail has spoken to Boras and was told there is no way Tex is coming here if we trade BRob.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/baseball/bal-sp.connolly28feb28,0,227944.column

If anybody believes that report, then they might be interested in buying this here "prime real estate"...great price, available now, ready for residential development....

<image src= "http://climatex.org/media/images-image-image/Garbage_landfill.jpg">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Cindy; for what it's worth (and I realize it is very little). In a response to Dan Connolly's article regarding Tex in the Sun today, someone claiming insider information said McPhail has spoken to Boras and was told there is no way Tex is coming here if we trade BRob.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/baseball/bal-sp.connolly28feb28,0,227944.column

We better put our boots on. The b.s. is getting mighty thick. Haha.

I'm saying that about the guy with "insider information," not you Big Al. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and in other relevant news, Gammons reported earlier today that

Gammons notes that the Cubs have discussed Matt Murton with the Rangers and Red Sox, but he alone wouldn't get them Marlon Byrd or Coco Crisp. Murton was drafted 32nd overall by Boston in '03, and then traded to the Cubs a year later in the Nomar Garciaparra deal. Murton would remain pretty well blocked in Boston though.
MLBTR

So, it looks like the Cubs are still trying to move Murton, and not to the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about getting Murton then packaging him with a prospect for a blocked SS. Let Cedeno play 2nd or get a blocked 2nd baseman and let Cedeno stay at SS. Maybe we could include Murton and a Pitcher and get Duran from the Rangers or move him to the Pads or Indians. Im sure after Spring training teams will be in need of a player like Murton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about getting Murton then packaging him with a prospect for a blocked SS. Let Cedeno play 2nd or get a blocked 2nd baseman and let Cedeno stay at SS. Maybe we could include Murton and a Pitcher and get Duran from the Rangers or move him to the Pads or Indians. Im sure after Spring training teams will be in need of a player like Murton.

I mentionied this a few weeks ago. I think a package of Murton/Scott and one of our young pitchers (i.e., Olson, Liz, etc.) would be able to get us a nice SS or 2B prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Cindy; for what it's worth (and I realize it is very little). In a response to Dan Connolly's article regarding Tex in the Sun today, someone claiming insider information said McPhail has spoken to Boras and was told there is no way Tex is coming here if we trade BRob.

I am sure Boras would be all about telling one of the teams that may offer the most money for his client that they are not interested in playing for them.

That makes sense try to weaken the market for your client.

People need to stop taking everyones "insider" information seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about getting Murton then packaging him with a prospect for a blocked SS. Let Cedeno play 2nd or get a blocked 2nd baseman and let Cedeno stay at SS. Maybe we could include Murton and a Pitcher and get Duran from the Rangers or move him to the Pads or Indians. Im sure after Spring training teams will be in need of a player like Murton.

I'm not so sure. Murton is a good hitter, but his inflexibility in the field makes it hard for teams to carry him.

His only position is left field. All outfielders can play left field. As a 4th or 5th outfielder, most teams want someone that can play all 3 spots reasonably well, or at least both corners or first base. Remember, since nearly all teams carry 12 pitchers, there are only 5 bench spots (4 plus the DH in the AL.) Typically the mix is something like 2 OF's, 2 UT inf, and a C. Even in the AL, teams like for their primary DH to have some fielding capability and flexibility, unless they happen to have an Ortiz-type stud.

This was evidenced by Texas deciding to pass on a Murton-for-Byrd offer from the Cubs. Texas figures to have a Catalanotto/Nelson Cruz platoon in LF as of now, and there aren't many teams that would figure to possibly be more interested in a Murton than the Rangers. Yet they said no.

His marketability is pretty much limited to teams for whom he would be the clear-cut starter at LF or DH. Even then, a team may have salary issues that make cutting or trading the player blocking Murton problematic (like Huff or Gibbons with the Orioles.)

EPat faces this type of issue, as well. From what I've read, he is rated too far below ML average at 2B to be viable there, and lacks the arm for CF or RF. His bat, his speed, and the fact that he can fill in at 2B and possibly CF in an emergency, mitigates this concern slightly in his case, but it is still an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he'll outhit Scott this year. The Cubs fans say so.

Sounds like you're incredulous. Curious, how many Orioles do you expect will outhit Murton this year?

The list is short... 3 or 4 is probably being generous. It could easily be just 1 or 2. Last year it was 3, IIRC.

So the Cubs can't give away a guy that would instantly improve the middle of the O's lineup. Not sure you ought to be crowing too loudly about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because we don't need a player like Murton. We already have a stockpile of LF/1B/DH type players and he just adds to it. He has been declining and at his best is a part-time player.

So it doesn't matter if Murton is better, cheaper, and younger than all, but one of them (Scott)? And can you really call a player who has played just 2 professional seasons declining? At his best, he is mostly an everyday player who mashes LHP and puts up respectable numbers against all but the toughest RHP, which is when he would find himself on the bench.

We already have Jones, Markakis, Scott, Payton, Redman, Roberson, and Reimold (in the wings) for the outfield. If we trade Payton to the Cubs, I'll be "okay" with getting Murton back. However, if we add Murton to the names listed above, we'll have a cluster**** in the outfield.

Jones in CF, Markakis in RF, Scott at DH/LF...Payton? Redman? Roberson?? None of those guys should prevent us from acquiring Murton...we could cut each of them without missing a beat.

Reimold is a guy to watch, but he still hasn't proven anything above AA yet. If he forces the FO's hand at some point, I don't think it will be tough to move a guy from the glut of players that occupy the same position.

If we have a chance to acquire a guy like Murton who is better than most of the players that play the same spot, we shouldn't let concerns about playing time prevent us from acquiring him.

And who is the alternative? Is it Patterson? I personally don't have much confidence in the bat of Patterson not to mention his questionable defense. Veal? Talented pitcher, but struggled mightily with his control and we know the risk of attrition in young pitchers. Ceda? Talented, but a very long ways away and again there is a risk with pitchers. Colvin? One of the most overrated prospects in baseball.

Murton is about as much of a sure thing as Roberts, is still relatively young and would be under our control for a long time. I don't see why anybody would be opposed to him being included in this deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like you're incredulous. Curious, how many Orioles do you expect will outhit Murton this year?

The list is short... 3 or 4 is probably being generous. It could easily be just 1 or 2. Last year it was 3, IIRC.

So the Cubs can't give away a guy that would instantly improve the middle of the O's lineup. Not sure you ought to be crowing too loudly about that.

I'm not sure what all the hating on Murton is all about either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • When he first came up, his slider was very mediocre and only really used as a get me over change of pace. Now it seems like a weapon. I wonder if he went to school with Professor Bradish for that.
    • Yeah, kinda why I asked the question. That seems real lofty for a comparison.
    • After a really disappointing April that saw his ERA balloon to 7.78, Alex Pham has found his bearings in May, allowing 3 ER in 14.1 IP, allowing 8 hits and 4 walks while striking out 17.   Yesterday Pham allowed a run on 2 hits and a walk in 4.2 innings, striking out 7.   53 of 72 pitches were strikes.  The sole run charged to Pham scored when reliever Kyle Virbitsky allowed a 2-out double to the first batter he faced after relieving Pham in the fifth.    Due to the poor start, Pham’s ERA still rests at an unimpressive 5.29, but he’s definitely been headed in the right direction.  Also, he’s struck out 40 batters in 34 innings.     
    • I can’t emphasize enough how stupid that rain delay was.  No rain at all for 45 minutes, then two hours of light mist, the kind that teams play through all the time.  I was standing near the kids play area during most of the delay and believe me, that rain didn’t deter any kids from using the playground equipment for two hours. Then, 15 minutes before the game is going to start, the grounds crew is watering the infield.  What? The game itself was not worth the wait, needless to say.   But what annoys me most is the complete lack of communication during these delays.  How about letting the fans who are there know what the thinking is about how long the delay will be?  How about an update every 30 minutes or so.   Nope, nothing.   Just a generic message on the scoreboard saying that the start of the game will be delayed to to the “threat” of inclement weather.   My phone was showing .05” of rain expected in the next six hours.  Some threat! On the bright side, the team did announce that ticket holders would be given vouchers that could be used for a Monday - Thursday game.  That was the least they could do.       
    • 19,286 for that rain-delayed mess of a game.  I’d say about 2/3 of those stuck through the 3 hour delay and were in their seats at game time.  
    • And paid Scherzer, and Zimmerman, and Corbin, and Werth.   They didn’t all work out, but nobody could say the Nats didn’t spend to put a winning team on the field during their run.  The run basically ended because Stras II and Corbin blew up in their face.   But there’s always 2019.   
    • I can’t believe that 8 hours after Grayson stepped off the mound, I’m the first person to update his thread.   After a 19-day IL stint and without a rehab stint, Grayson threw 6 innings of one-hit shutout ball last night.  The one hit was an infield squibber hit 59.5 mph off the bat.  His command was a tad shaky at times, as he walked three and hit a batter, but he still breezed through 6 innings on 82 pitches, 50 for strikes.  If it hadn’t been his first outing in three weeks, he certainly could have pitched the 7th inning.  Unfortunately, the bullpen blew it for him. Fastball topped out at 98.4 and he was still hitting 97 in his final inning.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...