Jump to content

Sun-Times says O's want Cedeno, Gallagher, and 2 more prospects


Bigbie03

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 413
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Is Cedeno really worth it?

SEASON TEAM G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB BB SO SB CS OBP SLG AVG

2005 Chicago Cubs 41 80 13 24 3 0 1 6 30 5 11 1 0 .356 .375 .300

2006 Chicago Cubs 151 534 51 131 18 7 6 41 181 17 109 8 8 .271 .339 .245

2007 Chicago Cubs 38 74 6 15 2 0 4 13 29 3 18 2 1 .231 .392 .203

I just don't see a point in getting a low level backup SS that Cubs seemed to have given up upon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Cedeno really worth it?

SEASON TEAM G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB BB SO SB CS OBP SLG AVG

2005 Chicago Cubs 41 80 13 24 3 0 1 6 30 5 11 1 0 .356 .375 .300

2006 Chicago Cubs 151 534 51 131 18 7 6 41 181 17 109 8 8 .271 .339 .245

2007 Chicago Cubs 38 74 6 15 2 0 4 13 29 3 18 2 1 .231 .392 .203

I just don't see a point in getting a low level backup SS that Cubs seemed to have given up upon.

Look at his minor league numbers.

He's got the ability to hit well enough to be an average or better MLB SS, the question is if he can make the transition to the majors. He's failed in his previous attempt (didn't get much time in '05 or '07). Chicago doesn't have the luxury of being able to find out if he can hack it, we do. He's certainly worht the risk as the 3rd or 4th player coming back in the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three guys agreed to (according to bigbird who I trust on here) is good to hear.

I think I would like these trades if one goes down (in order):

Roberts and Payton for Gallagher(anyone else have to look up his name everytime you post it for spelling? :D ), Cedeno, Veal and Colvin

Roberts and Payton for Gallagher, Cedeno, Veal and PTBNL (Thomas)

Roberts and Payton for Gallagher, Cedeno, Veal and Patterson

I would take either of those deals. I think they would all be fair for both sides. If you guys could ONLY get one, which would you choose? Cedeno or Petterson?

I'd move the Thomas trade (though very unlikely, IMO) up to #1, a Colvin trade would be #2, insert Murton as the fourth piece as the #3 preference and Patterson as #4 preference. I have a bad feeling he's just like his brother (which mean's he'll only be a filler at 2b until we get our real 2b of the future).

Now, if Ceda were available, he'd change everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hendry is going to trade Patterson either in the Roberts deal or to get a outfielder the hits right handed and plays all 3 positions.The White Sox are said to be looking at Patterson and there are offering Brian Anderson.That is per Bruce Levine of Espn 1000 chicago.I believe if Am wants E Pat Hendry would trade him in the Roberts deal.The Cubs are really excited about Thomas as there future 2nd baseman in 2 to 3 years.

Brian Anderson would be an interesting guy to acquire for that flex OF spot. A change of scenery would probably be good for him.

I say the Cubs should do that, and drop this Roberts pursuit altogether. He'd be a great guy to add to the lineup, but not at these prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree if I thought Patterson was at least an average defender at 2B. BUT, I don't think he is.

Hopefully that's what the O's scouts will be trying to determine in the next week or so. If they feel like he is adequate defensively, I think we should definitely be asking for Patterson back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree if I thought Patterson was at least an average defender at 2B. BUT, I don't think he is.
I think he'll be below average defensively, but still good enough to stick there. We certainly are in a position to be able to find out though. This is the perfect season to find out things like that.

About half the league is below average defensively. Its not the worst thing in the world.

I certainly think his bat will play, we'll find somewhere to put him.

I do like the Todd Walker comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, Murton only makes sense if Payton is going to the Cubs.

Why?

Murton is a much better player than Payton. I don't get why we wouldn't be interested in a player like Murton to be in a package of likely 4 players for Roberts. He is about as safe a bet to put up good numbers as Roberts, and is under our control for 4 more years until he is a FA.

He would be a much better investement than Veal, Patterson, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why?

Murton is a much better player than Payton. I don't get why we wouldn't be interested in a player like Murton to be in a package of likely 4 players for Roberts. He is about as safe a bet to put up good numbers as Roberts, and is under our control for 4 more years until he is a FA.

He would be a much better investement than Veal, Patterson, etc.

Because we don't need a player like Murton. We already have a stockpile of LF/1B/DH type players and he just adds to it. He has been declining and at his best is a part-time player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because we don't need a player like Murton. We already have a stockpile of LF/1B/DH type players and he just adds to it. He has been declining and at his best is a part-time player.

Murton has only been declining because he hasn't been getting consistant playing time. It's hard to stay sharp when you are collecting splinters. He'd easily out OPS Millar this season and most likely Huff as well if he was the full time DH IMO...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why?

Murton is a much better player than Payton. I don't get why we wouldn't be interested in a player like Murton to be in a package of likely 4 players for Roberts. He is about as safe a bet to put up good numbers as Roberts, and is under our control for 4 more years until he is a FA.

He would be a much better investement than Veal, Patterson, etc.

We already have Jones, Markakis, Scott, Payton, Redman, Roberson, and Reimold (in the wings) for the outfield. If we trade Payton to the Cubs, I'll be "okay" with getting Murton back. However, if we add Murton to the names listed above, we'll have a cluster**** in the outfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think you read my whole comment.  I said the game realistically wasn’t at risk. As a fan I want the 11-0 shutout. The Boston fans are able to say,” At least we didn’t get shut out.” That’s why we are always happy to get a meaningless ninth inning run to spoil the shutout when we’re getting whammed. There’s even a term for it; “an FU run.” Yes, we won, but as fans, we’d rather have won 11-0 than 11-3, and everyone who has ever been happy about that single run in the ninth to spoil the opposition’s shutout would agree. As GM, Mike doesn’t care about an individual game. I made that clear. He wanted to see what Viera could do. My entire point during this exchange is that he already basically knows what to expect from Viera, and it’s not good. If he wants to try to fix what is wrong, fine. DFA him and send him to AA or AAA and let him work, and if he doesn’t make it through waivers, oh, well. But don’t put him on the 26 and let him try to fix his problems in games that count. Ive already said that Viera shouldn’t have been on the 26, but given that he was, Mike was obviously willing to give Viera a chance at a live audition. 
    • He's so young and such a good hitter that even if he's an old man running right now he's probably going to sit at around this level as a runner/defender for another 3-4 years.  That's a lot longer than most people who sign big FA contracts.  If he signs a 10 year deal he'll be 35 in the last year of the deal, and he's got a good chance of still being a productive player at that time, which isn't really something you can say about most players.  If he follows a typical aging curve, he'll still be worth around 20-25 batting runs over average at age 35, which is enough for him to be a 3-4 win player even as a DH.
    • 800 OPS in slumps is pretty good. Look at Druw Jones or Elijah Green. I believe he’s making some minor adjustments.
    • You are stating that he has a 52nd percentile throwing arm and that his throws are accurate.  Then stating he does not have a good arm?  Those are conflicting statements.  I'm seeing a 91 percentile for arm value, per Baseball Savant.  Moreover, he does not run like an old man.  A statement like that should be reserved for bottom tier percentile runners, not average or slightly below average ones.    I think his defense could continue to improve, yes.  He's only 25.  You are talking as if he's a guy in his early 30s, who is about to hit a cliff.  In Yankee stadium, he should be able to play adequate defense in RF for quite some time. 
    • Agree that Ottavino would be a good target. He’s somewhat similar to Cano in that he’s a lot better against RHB’s, but he’d still be a good add. I would still hope for an even better reliever (either in addition to him or instead of him if they’re only adding one piece) but he would definitely strengthen the BP.
    • That's why I said I don't think it's his top priority. But I do think he thinks about these scenarios. 
    • Yeah. If it were just Mayo for Skubal for 2+ years, you'd have to consider it
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...