Jump to content

For What it's worth.....


Belkast

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 773
  • Created
  • Last Reply
They want the young pitchers to earn the spots in the major league rotation. It is something we havent had in forever. Players forcing their way on to the roster.

And handing the job to a guy like Steve Trachsel is so much better? What left to guys like Albers and Olson have left to prove at AAA. It's either put up or shut up time. We're not expecting to actually win anything this year........ wouldn't it be a perfect time to let some of the younger guys prove themselves? We have nothing to gain with Steve Trachsel starting 25-30 baseball games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They want the young pitchers to earn the spots in the major league rotation. It is something we havent had in forever. Players forcing their way on to the roster.

It seems like that is what they are trying to do, but I don't think I agree with the second vet. You have to think at least one of our guys (i.e. Penn/Olson) is ready to swink or swim at the pro-level.

Now if for some reason we were going to be trading one of the more "ready" guys, than maybe it would make sense, but otherwise, its going to make watching more painful, knowing you're not at least watching a part of the future, just a fill-in vet that really provides no meaningful benefit.

Oh well, I guess we'll wait and see. Thanks for the info Belkast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the Indians offer something like Miller and Peralta?

If it is true that we will really/truly make a very strong push for Tex and get him, than I would keep Roberts. If we're not going to get Tex/some other real good hitter at a spot we need next year, then I would trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another vet pitcher? If so, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. All of a sudden it seems that MacPhail or someone actually thinks we might win 55 games instead of 54......:rolleyes:

Hah!

But if I had my choice I would love to have a vet or two around the young guys. Flash forward 2 or 3 seasons, or whenever you believe it's reasonable to think of the O's as contenders. At that point, in my opinion, your young pitchers are better off if they spent the 2008 season (and maybe more) around some wise vets that helped them along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And handing the job to a guy like Steve Trachsel is so much better? What left to guys like Albers and Olson have left to prove at AAA. It's either put up or shut up time. We're not expecting to actually win anything this year........ wouldn't it be a perfect time to let some of the younger guys prove themselves? We have nothing to gain with Steve Trachsel starting 25-30 baseball games.

Olson should go back to AAA. He changed his routine when he got to the majors so he needs to go back and get himself back to his old self.

I am not saying Trachsel is any better, but at the same time, throwing vets out there, you can try and get their value up and trade them down the line for more minor league players and or keep the service time down on the minor leaguers you currently have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hah!

But if I had my choice I would love to have a vet or two around the young guys. Flash forward 2 or 3 seasons, or whenever you believe it's reasonable to think of the O's as contenders. At that point, in my opinion, your young pitchers are better off if they spent the 2008 season (and maybe more) around some wise vets that helped them along.

Problem is, you get another vet, there ain't gonna be any young guys for them to be around . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plan is to sign a guy like Lohse for one year, then possibly look to trade him in July...Basically, he serves as a stop gap to allow the young pitchers a few more months of MiL pitching.

If this is still the plan, it is a good one IMO.

What i want to know is does this mean Trax is still handed a spot or does he actually have to earn it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...