Jump to content

The This Team IS Done, We are Dumb and Nothing can Fix it MEGA THREAD


MagicBird

Recommended Posts

"I would love to come into a clubhouse and want to have dinner with everyone on the team. But you can't do that because there are too many guys. You can't attract all the same personalities. There are just too many people for everyone to be great friends. And guys realize that."

"I've been on teams where there was one guy ... who made everyone miserable. But you're not thinking about that when you're on the field. Not at all. It's a nonissue. I don't really see how it affects the team's play. Will you throw 95 instead of 90 because you're happier in the clubhouse? Will you throw strikes?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

“I’ve never been one to make a big deal about chemistry. I think that comes with winning. I’ve played on some teams that had terrible chemistry but won because we had great players. [one club] I wouldn’t call that a close-knit ball club by any means, but we won."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“I remember ... teams that we played against in the late ’70s that would fight daily. So, that chemistry thing is kind of sometimes overblown, and I think it comes with winning. As time goes on, you build it. It’s always good at the beginning of the season and especially good when you’re winning at the beginning of the season, but the real test to it is when things go poorly. At some point, every team is going to go through a poor stretch, and then you see what you have. I have always been on the side of, give me good players, let them go out there and play their game, and that creates good team chemistry.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"When they win games they’ll have a great clubhouse like all the rest of us. If they don’t win, their clubhouse won’t be very good. If they do win, their clubhouse will be one of the best you ever saw."

"I'll tell you what ... chemistry is: Chemistry is a .300 batting average, 30 home runs, and 30 stolen bases."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“The focus and intensity of this camp has really been productive and crisp. There’s a more veteran approach. I love the vibe we have right now. I haven’t seen one guy waste time during the drills thus far. It’s a loose, but no-nonsense approach.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its funny the same people in this thread and others defending Manny are the very same people who bash Ortiz like crazy. Whenever Ortiz argues a call I read all the posts on here "we would never defend that if he was an O" "Buck would never play him if he was an O he just doesn't accept it". Umm getting harder and harder to say with how Manny acts isn't it? Oh wait 75% of people in the game thread thought Manny was in the right to throw the bat like he did. What a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?The focus and intensity of this camp has really been productive and crisp. There?s a more veteran approach. I love the vibe we have right now. I haven?t seen one guy waste time during the drills thus far. It?s a loose, but no-nonsense approach.?[/QUOTE]

Which is what we have grown accustom to, from a Buck managed team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its funny the same people in this thread and others defending Manny are the very same people who bash Ortiz like crazy. Whenever Ortiz argues a call I read all the posts on here "we would never defend that if he was an O" "Buck would never play him if he was an O he just doesn't accept it". Umm getting harder and harder to say with how Manny acts isn't it? Oh wait 75% of people in the game thread thought Manny was in the right to throw the bat like he did. What a joke.

Sorry but to label Manny in the same category with the Big Baby is wrong and it's apparent that you don't follow the game too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning breeds chemistry, not the other way around. They have to win.
I suspect it has more to do with poor performance from COF, Tillman and Norris, than chemistry.

I fall into this category. I don't believe for a second there is some terrible chemistry problem. If Tillman and Norris were pitching even close to their capabilities this year the Orioles would either be in first place right now or close to it. The Orioles have been pretty inconsistent this year and are only two games back. Imagine where they would be if Tillman and Norris weren't 3-11 with a 7.28 ERA in 16 starts this season? Let that sink in a bit. Offense traditionally ebbs and flows throughout a season and May was a terrible month overall for the Orioles offensively, but when your opening day starter allows 89 base runners in 53 innings and can't protect a lead to save his life you can't imagine your "chemistry" is going to be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Yankees (both FO and players) openly were critical of ARod and did everything they could to keep him off the field. They are leading the AL East. So either their clubhouse chemistry sucks and they are still leading the division, OR the chemistry has improved because ARod is playing well and leading them to wins. Either way, the Yankees are evidence that a poor clubhouse morale does not necessarily correlate to play on the field.

Any weight to the fact that he's back to making similar throwing errors to those he made in Double-A -- essentially dropping his arm getting a little sloppy in his footwork? It's only two months into the season, but as an amateur and in the minors he did have a propensity to get a little lazy with his execution. I do think he has to grow-up. I do not think this is anything unexpected for a player of his talent and experience. There is a solid vet presence that should continue to help mold him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but to label Manny in the same category with the Big Baby is wrong and it's apparent that you don't follow the game too much.

Well you'd be wrong if you said that as I've been around the game my whole life. I umpire high school/college ball and watch MLB whenever I can. My wifes family lives in Boston so I've seen Big Pappi play in person a ton. I have weekend season tickets to the O's so I've seen them in person a lot. Big Pappi didn't start out doing what he does now. It builds and Manny is certianly well on that path. Hell, he threw a bat at a player last year and threw it down in disgust 5 days ago. Not sure how anyone can defend that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning breeds chemistry, not the other way around. They have to win.
I suspect it has more to do with poor performance from COF, Tillman and Norris, than chemistry.
Good chemistry comes from a solid work environment and collection of personality/profile types that don't clash.

And winning! You can love every guy on the team, but if you lose 100 games that lockeroom is not going to be fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...