Jump to content

Update on Matt Wieters - Looking like June 4th Return


Redskins Rick

Recommended Posts

They were talking about this last night on the radio.

http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/05/12/matt-wieters-expected-to-be-activated-june-4/

Wieters, who had Tommy John surgery last June 17, was placed on the 60-day disabled list on Sunday, and he?s eligible to return on June 4.

?He should join us then if everything goes well, if we don?t have any setbacks. It may be an every other day scenario,? manager Buck Showalter said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Its good he'll be back I guess, but at this point I'm not sure he's a real upgrade over Caleb. At least Caleb should get the joback next year.

I'm not so sure how much I believe Caleb's gains at the plate are sustainable. The .357 BABIP is obviously fluky and will regress. The numbers say his eye is a tad better this season, but nothing to support the jump in walk rate from 6.2% to 12.6%.

Here's hoping I'm incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure how much I believe Caleb's gains at the plate are sustainable. The .357 BABIP is obviously fluky and will regress. The numbers say his eye is a tad better this season, but nothing to support the jump in walk rate from 6.2% to 12.6%.

Here's hoping I'm incorrect.

I hope it is, and he will probably be the 2016 starting catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure how much I believe Caleb's gains at the plate are sustainable. The .357 BABIP is obviously fluky and will regress. The numbers say his eye is a tad better this season, but nothing to support the jump in walk rate from 6.2% to 12.6%.

Here's hoping I'm incorrect.

You're probably right. However, Wieters hasn't exactly been an offensive powerhouse so there isn't much of a drop off with Caleb. Wieters is better defensively so it will be nice getting him back if he's healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously as an O's fan, I hope he comes back and makes the All-Star game because of how awesome a month he had! However, I worry that he's not going to contribute positively this year. Arm strength aside, he did not have a single hit in spring training. That worries me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously as an O's fan, I hope he comes back and makes the All-Star game because of how awesome a month he had! However, I worry that he's not going to contribute positively this year. Arm strength aside, he did not have a single hit in spring training. That worries me.

And Boras wanted him as a DH:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously as an O's fan, I hope he comes back and makes the All-Star game because of how awesome a month he had! However, I worry that he's not going to contribute positively this year. Arm strength aside, he did not have a single hit in spring training. That worries me.

It'll be over a year since he's lasted played in a major league game once he returns. I don't expect him to be in form for a little while, and thats a tough pill to swallow when you have a catcher who's currently playing very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll be over a year since he's lasted played in a major league game once he returns. I don't expect him to be in form for a little while, and thats a tough pill to swallow when you have a catcher who's currently playing very well.

Not really.

You spell CJ 2-3 games a week and maybe he gets a game or two at DH.

Matt gets some time at DH and some time at Catcher.

What it impacts is Paredes. Does his glove play well enough for them to plug him in at 2rd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If and When Wieters is with the Orioles, he will start.

We know that he won't be here after this season (since that bridge has been burned years ago) so baring any injury he will be the starter and Caleb will be the back-up. Buck may decide to give him more days off or some games at DH.

I think Matt is one of Bucks guys. He's gread catcher and well respected in the club house. I really couldn't see Buck benching him or "limited" playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm lost for words about why Rutschman struggled, other than as I've long said he's a catcher and you're not going to get a MOO monster bat playing 110 games behind the plate- but the overall outcome of the team was within what I thought was reasonable, if a bit on the low end. Regarding the depth, Holliday and Mayo are more talented than Urias, but if we had gotten rid of Urias, Mateo, and Mountcastle to hand them spots, this team would have been worse for it, and maybe not even make the playoffs. Urias is good.  Mountcastle is good.  They're not "everyday" players according to your definition, but we have exactly one of those guys.  That doesn't mean every one else is " not good." I wouldn't be surprised to see all three back next year.  I wouldn't be surprised if they moved on from 2-3 of them.  Though I think the former is far wiser than the latter, though it depends on a lot of other things.
    • My post is coming off the wrong way.  The OP I quoted seemed like you were “lost for words” about why the team struggled the way they did. All I’m saying is I think you are like that because you didn’t see the scenarios where this much of a drop off from last year was going to happen. And btw, the depth (to me at least) wasn’t a good thing.  Depth is good when the players are good. If not, they are just guys blocking better talent.
    • But we have no idea who told her or of the info is good. She has given no reason to believe her. Im sure someone told her something but im not sure she smart enough to be able to tell the difference between good info and bad info.
    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...